scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

“Liking” and “Take Away” Preferences for Mexican Consumers: Cross‐Cultural Comparison with Thais for Psychological Style

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this article, the authors investigated a possible stable cross-cultural difference with the use of paired preference tests between two potential markets and found that Mexican consumers performed preference tests using, as closely as possible, the experimental method used in the Thai experiments.
Abstract
There are reports in the literature that for paired preference tests with a “No Preference” option, Mexican consumers have a lower frequency of “No Preference” responses than Thais. For a more exact comparison of these differences in psychophysical style, Mexican consumers performed preference tests using, as closely as possible, the experimental method used in the Thai experiments. Comparison between this study and the Thai studies confirmed the differences in “No Preference” frequencies, suggesting a systematic cross-cultural effect of psychophysical style. Mexican consumers also performed “take away” preferences for the first time and their results corresponded more with the regular paired preference tests than was the case with Thais. Practical Applications Paired preference tests are a subset of measures available for consumer acceptance. Considering the importance of efforts to predict consumer acceptance, it is essential to understand the variables and biases associated with such tests. Because cross-cultural measurement is becoming more critical in a globalized world, any systematic cross-cultural differences should not be ignored. The present study investigated a possible stable cross-cultural difference with the use of paired preference tests between two potential markets. For companies that sell their products in a variety of countries, such differences will need to be taken into account when interpreting paired preference data and accordingly are worthy of investigation.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal Article

Thinking fast and slow.

TL;DR: Prospect Theory led cognitive psychology in a new direction that began to uncover other human biases in thinking that are probably not learned but are part of the authors' brain’s wiring.
Journal ArticleDOI

Concurrent elicitation of hedonic and CATA/RATA responses with Chinese and Korean consumers: Hedonic bias is unlikely to occur

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors investigated the risk of hedonic product responses being biased by co-elicitation of CATA/RATA questions for sensory product characterisation.
Journal ArticleDOI

Effect of culture on sensory and consumer research: Asian perspectives

TL;DR: In this article, the authors classify several goals of cross-cultural sensory and consumer research and address the theoretical/methodological issues in each goal, and propose future research directions from Asian perspectives while highlighting the context-dependency of cultural mindsets and its implication on affective measurements for product testing.
Journal ArticleDOI

The evolution of paired preference tests from forced choice to the use of ‘No Preference’ options, from preference frequencies to d′ values, from placebo pairs to signal detection

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors describe how the forced choice test can be refined by supplementing frequency measures with d′ measures from signal detection theory, which elicited more accurate measures of preference strength.
References
More filters
Book

Thinking, Fast and Slow

TL;DR: Buku terlaris New York Times and The Economist tahun 2012 as mentioned in this paper, and dipilih oleh The NewYork Times Book Review sebagai salah satu dari sepuluh buku terbaik tahune 2011, Berpikir, Cepat and Lambat ditakdirkan menjadi klasik.
Journal Article

Thinking fast and slow.

TL;DR: Prospect Theory led cognitive psychology in a new direction that began to uncover other human biases in thinking that are probably not learned but are part of the authors' brain’s wiring.
Journal ArticleDOI

Response Style and Cross-Cultural Comparisons of Rating Scales Among East Asian and North American Students

TL;DR: The authors examined cross-cultural differences in response style regarding the use of rating scales and found that Japanese and Chinese students were more likely than the two North American groups to use the midpoint on the scales.
Journal ArticleDOI

Comparison in Use of the 9-Point Hedonic Scale between Americans, Chinese, Koreans, and Thai

TL;DR: In this article, the authors compare the usage of the 9-point hedonic scale between American, Korean, Chinese and Thai consumers and examine if there are significant differences in preference between consumers of the same culture residing in the US and their country of origin.
Related Papers (5)