scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessBook

Limits of Citizenship: Migrants and Postnational Membership in Europe

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
Soysal et al. as mentioned in this paper compare the different ways European nations incorporate immigrants, how these policies evolved, and how they are influenced by international human rights discourse, and suggest a possible accommodation to these shifts: specifically, a model of post-national membership that derives its legitimacy from universal personhood, rather than national belonging.
Abstract
In many Western countries, rights that once belonged solely to citizens are being extended to immigrants, a trend that challenges the nature and basis of citizenship at a time when nation-states are fortifying their boundaries through restirictive border controls and expressions of nationalist ideologies. In this book, Yasemin Soysal compares the different ways European nations incorporate immigrants, how these policies evolved, and how they are influenced by international human rights discourse. Soysal focuses on postwar international migration, paying particular attention to "guestworkers." Taking an in-depth look at France, Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom, she identifies three major patterns that reflect the varying emphasis particular states place on individual versus corporate groups as the basis for incorporation. She finds that the global expansion and intensification of human rights discourse puts nation-states under increasing outside pressure to extend membership rights to aliens, resulting in an increasingly blurred line between citizen and noncitizen. Finally, she suggests a possible accommodation to these shifts: specifically, a model of post-national membership that derives its legitimacy from universal personhood, rather than national belonging. This fresh approach to the study of citizenship, rights, and immigration will be invaluable to anyone involved in issues of human rights, international migration, and transnational cultural interactions, as well as to those who study the contemporary transformation of the nation-state, nationalism, and globalization.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Discourse, politics and policy : The Dutch parliamentary debate about voting rights for foreign residents

TL;DR: In this paper, the results of research concerning parliamentary debate about voting rights for foreign residents in the Netherlands (1970-1996) using a discourse analytical framework were presented, and the results were used to evaluate the impact of voting rights on Dutch society.
Journal ArticleDOI

Rights and wrongs across European borders: migrants, minorities and citizenship

TL;DR: This article explore the changing dynamics of debates about citizenship, migration, inclusion and exclusion in four European countries (Britain, France, Germany and Italy) and analyse some of the key dimensions of recent debates and their impact on policy agendas.
Journal ArticleDOI

Reshaping China’s Urban Citizenship: Street Vendors, Chengguan and Struggles over the Right to the City:

TL;DR: The authors examines spatial politics involved with the remaking of urban citizenship across Chinese cities and shows how unregistered migrants' lack of status has increasingly become an important basis of exclusion and a burden, as they are denied access to new legitimate avenues of claims-making such as NGOs, courts and arbitration.
Journal ArticleDOI

“There's a Spirit That Transcends the Border”: Faith, Ritual, and Postnational Protest at the U.S.-Mexico Border

TL;DR: The Posada Sin Fronteras, an annual politi- cal and religious-informed event that calls attention to the rising death toll at the US-Mexico border caused by changes in US border enforcement policies, has been studied in this article.
Journal ArticleDOI

Globalisation, multiculturalism and individualism: The Swedish debate on dual citizenship

TL;DR: In this article, the authors analyzed the arguments used in the debate preceding the Swedish Citizenship Law of 2001 and concluded that the opponents of dual citizenship usually defended a nation-state order, in which individuals should belong to one single nation state and this belonging should be manifested in national citizenship.