scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessBook

Limits of Citizenship: Migrants and Postnational Membership in Europe

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
Soysal et al. as mentioned in this paper compare the different ways European nations incorporate immigrants, how these policies evolved, and how they are influenced by international human rights discourse, and suggest a possible accommodation to these shifts: specifically, a model of post-national membership that derives its legitimacy from universal personhood, rather than national belonging.
Abstract
In many Western countries, rights that once belonged solely to citizens are being extended to immigrants, a trend that challenges the nature and basis of citizenship at a time when nation-states are fortifying their boundaries through restirictive border controls and expressions of nationalist ideologies. In this book, Yasemin Soysal compares the different ways European nations incorporate immigrants, how these policies evolved, and how they are influenced by international human rights discourse. Soysal focuses on postwar international migration, paying particular attention to "guestworkers." Taking an in-depth look at France, Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom, she identifies three major patterns that reflect the varying emphasis particular states place on individual versus corporate groups as the basis for incorporation. She finds that the global expansion and intensification of human rights discourse puts nation-states under increasing outside pressure to extend membership rights to aliens, resulting in an increasingly blurred line between citizen and noncitizen. Finally, she suggests a possible accommodation to these shifts: specifically, a model of post-national membership that derives its legitimacy from universal personhood, rather than national belonging. This fresh approach to the study of citizenship, rights, and immigration will be invaluable to anyone involved in issues of human rights, international migration, and transnational cultural interactions, as well as to those who study the contemporary transformation of the nation-state, nationalism, and globalization.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Citizenship and inclusion: rethinking the analytical category of noncitizenship

TL;DR: The notion of non-citizenship has been investigated in a variety of accounts of inclusive citizenship as mentioned in this paper, and it has been argued that these accounts all end up reducing noncitizenship to a journey to citizenship, which is difficult to theorise as a distinct theoretical category outside of citizenship.
Journal ArticleDOI

From Alien to Elector: Citizenship and Belonging in the Global City

TL;DR: The authors argue that by re-imbedding global cities within the institutional context of the nation-state, scholars can productively explore whether and how these cities may transform state sovereignty.
Posted Content

Policy Change and the Politics of Expertise: Economic Ideas and Immigration Control Reforms in Switzerland

TL;DR: In this article, a framework for the analysis of the impact of economic expertise is provided, and then used in an historical analysis comparing the 1960s and the 1990s, concluding that economic experts played an important role in framing the reforms conducted during this latter period.
Journal ArticleDOI

Politics, Industrialization and Citizenship: Unemployment Policy in England, France and the United States, 1890-1950*

TL;DR: For example, the authors argues that T.H. Marshall's state-based emphasis on social welfare as "social right" has reminded those interested in reform that appeals to membership in a national community, the essence of citizenship have served to rally groups to successful struggles for reform.
Journal ArticleDOI

Nationalism in a Liberal Register: Beyond the 'Paradox of Universalism' in Immigrant Integration Politics

TL;DR: The authors argues that the paradox of universalism does not exist, and that therefore nationalism should not be dismissed as a central factor behind recent policy developments, and argues that prevalent liberal conceptions of national identity are paradoxical and inconsequential for the formulation of public policies.