scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessBook

Limits of Citizenship: Migrants and Postnational Membership in Europe

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
Soysal et al. as mentioned in this paper compare the different ways European nations incorporate immigrants, how these policies evolved, and how they are influenced by international human rights discourse, and suggest a possible accommodation to these shifts: specifically, a model of post-national membership that derives its legitimacy from universal personhood, rather than national belonging.
Abstract
In many Western countries, rights that once belonged solely to citizens are being extended to immigrants, a trend that challenges the nature and basis of citizenship at a time when nation-states are fortifying their boundaries through restirictive border controls and expressions of nationalist ideologies. In this book, Yasemin Soysal compares the different ways European nations incorporate immigrants, how these policies evolved, and how they are influenced by international human rights discourse. Soysal focuses on postwar international migration, paying particular attention to "guestworkers." Taking an in-depth look at France, Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom, she identifies three major patterns that reflect the varying emphasis particular states place on individual versus corporate groups as the basis for incorporation. She finds that the global expansion and intensification of human rights discourse puts nation-states under increasing outside pressure to extend membership rights to aliens, resulting in an increasingly blurred line between citizen and noncitizen. Finally, she suggests a possible accommodation to these shifts: specifically, a model of post-national membership that derives its legitimacy from universal personhood, rather than national belonging. This fresh approach to the study of citizenship, rights, and immigration will be invaluable to anyone involved in issues of human rights, international migration, and transnational cultural interactions, as well as to those who study the contemporary transformation of the nation-state, nationalism, and globalization.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Democracy, Indigenous Movements, and Postliberal Challenge in Latin America

Deborah J. Yashar
- 01 Oct 1999 - 
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors take issue with the conceptual and analytical underpinnings of this literature by highlighting how new political institutions, rather than securing democratic politics, have in fact had a more checkered effect.
Journal ArticleDOI

Immigration and the boundaries of citizenship : The institutions of immigrants' political transnationalism

TL;DR: The authors analyzes the emergence and the institutional structure of contemporary immigrants' transnational politics, and poses three questions: 1) How is transnational political structure structured? 2) How...
Book

Nationalist Exclusion and Ethnic Conflict: Shadows of Modernity

TL;DR: Theoretical explorations: 1. Compromise and closure: a theory of social dynamics 2. State Building and Ethnic Conflict: 3. Who owns the state? Ethnic conflicts after the end of empires 4. Nationalism and ethnic mobilisation in Mexico 5. The Politics of Exclusion in Nationalised States: 6. Racism and xenophobia 7. Nationalising multi-ethnic Switzerland as discussed by the authors.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Configuration of Symbolic Boundaries against Immigrants in Europe

TL;DR: The authors compared the relative salience or configuration of symbolic boundaries in 21 European countries. But the results indicate that the symbolic boundaries deployed by the general public do not correspond to the official "philosophies of integration" emphasized in the literature, and the data suggest previous comparisons have focused too heavily on Western Europe, overlooking important variation in other regions of Europe where immigration began more recen
Journal ArticleDOI

Crossing Borders: International Migration and National Security

TL;DR: In this article, the authors argue that migration management presents a far greater security challenge to weak and failing states than to advanced postindustrial states, and that states that are able to formulate and implement migration policies that harness the power of international migration will be more secure, rather than less secure, in the new globalized security environment.