Mechanical properties balance in novel Z-pinned sandwich panels: Out-of-plane properties
read more
Citations
Design and Analysis of Composite Structures: With Applications to Aerospace Structures
Epoxy‐Based Fibre Reinforced Nanocomposites
Carbon-fiber and aluminum-honeycomb sandwich composites with and without Kevlar-fiber interfacial toughening
Quasistatic deformation and failure modes of composite square honeycombs
Low-velocity impact behaviour of a shear thickening fluid (STF) and STF-filled sandwich composite panels
References
Mechanical testing of advanced fibre composites
Accurate characterization of machine compliance for simple compression testing
The effect of pin reinforcement upon the through-thickness compressive strength of foam-cored sandwich panels
Manufacture and Performance of Z-Pinned Composites
Related Papers (5)
The effect of pin reinforcement upon the through-thickness compressive strength of foam-cored sandwich panels
Frequently Asked Questions (18)
Q2. What is the main mode of failure for the pinned cores?
For the pinned cores the dominant mode of failure is that of the core-skin interface, while for the Nomex specimens the failure is determined by the shear buckling of the honeycomb cell walls.
Q3. What is the important factor in the mechanical properties of the X/K-CorTM?
It would be expected that the mechanical properties of the X/K-Cor™ products are mainly influenced by the Z-pin densities used, the pin insertion angle and the pin lay-out in the core.
Q4. What is the other coexistent failure mechanism for the X-Cor and K-Cor?
The other coexistent failure mechanism is pin pull out from the skin for the X-Cor and pin de-bond from the skin for the K-Cor specimen.
Q5. What are the requirements for the X-CorTM sandwich panels?
The required sandwich panel skins, which can be pre-cured composite or metallic plates, are then usually adhesively bonded onto the core.
Q6. What was the main conclusion of the study?
The basic conclusion was that the mechanical properties studied were strongly influenced by the angle at which the pins had been inserted into the foam core, with an angle of 10° exhibiting better in out-of-plane indentation resistance than equivalent samples with insertion angle of 20°.
Q7. What was the test method used to test sandwich cores?
The test was carried out according to ASTM C297 standard, the load being transmitted to the sandwich through thick loading blocks bonded to the sandwich skins.
Q8. What was the cure for the preform?
The film adhesive used to co-cure the prepreg skins onto K-Cor preform was Redux 322 and a 180° C cure with a 120° C dwell was used.
Q9. What is the test method used to determine shear properties of sandwich constructions?
The test method used, ASTM C 273, allows the determination of shear properties of sandwich constructions or cores, associated with shear distortion of planes parallel to the facings.
Q10. How many tensile shear tests are required to minimize secondary stresses?
The requirement on the length in order to minimize secondary stresses is to be at least 12 times the thickness and having the line of action of the direct tensile force passing through the diagonally opposite corners of the sandwich, as shown in Fig.4.
Q11. What is the optimum cross-section area of the specimen?
The determination of the effective cross-section area of the specimen Aeff, which is used in the calculations of the out-of-plane stresses and moduli, is based on the actual number of load-bearing pins in each sample.
Q12. What are the principal skin-core bond mechanisms?
In the case of the K-Cor structures, there are two principal skin-core bond mechanisms: - foam to skin bond and separate multiple bonds between the flattened pin surface and the skin (Fig.7c).
Q13. How many LVDTs were used to measure the displacements between the steel plates in both?
The relative displacements between the steel plates in both the longitudinal and the transversal directions were measured by two LVDTs positioned as close as possible to the centre lines of the specimen in order to limit the influence of the plate bending on the results [9].
Q14. What was the performance of the sandwich facings?
In the tests in which the sandwich specimen facings were required to be bonded to other metal parts the adhesive used was Redux 420A Araldite and the best performance was obtained for 150 minute cure at 70°C under slight pressure.
Q15. What was the first published work by Vaidya and colleagues?
The earliest published work by Vaidya and colleagues was prompted by considerations of whether these new materials could completely replace traditional honeycomb sandwich materials in aerospace applications and consequently itconcentrated on their resistance to impact loading and compression after impact [3 - 6].
Q16. What is the tensile stress of the sandwich?
The out-of-plane tensile stress σ is calculated by dividing the load P by the effective area of the specimen Aeff for the pinned cores (see Results and Discussion section) or by the original cross-sectional area for the Nomex.
Q17. How many mm thickness should the specimen have?
According to the test protocol the specimen should have a thickness equal to the thickness of the sandwich and a width not less than 50mm.
Q18. What is the role of the foam in the X-Cor sandwich panels?
If the absolute weight is the overriding issue, for the configuration of the X-Cor sandwich panels tested, the Rohacell foam may be removed without a significant performance penalty, except for situations where compressive loads are likely to occur.