scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Media Makes Momentum

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
This paper found that firms particularly covered by the media exhibit, ceteris paribus, significantly stronger momentum than stocks with high uncertainty, and are stronger in states with high investor individualism.
Abstract
Relying on 2.2 million articles from forty-five national and local U.S. newspapers between 1989 and 2010, we find that firms particularly covered by the media exhibit, ceteris paribus, significantly stronger momentum. The effect depends on article tone, reverses in the long run, is more pronounced for stocks with high uncertainty, and is stronger in states with high investor individualism. Our findings suggest that media coverage can exacerbate investor biases, leading return predictability to be strongest for firms in the spotlight of public attention. These results collectively lend credibility to an overreaction-based explanation for the momentum effect.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

News vs. Sentiment: Predicting Stock Returns from News Stories

TL;DR: The authors used a dataset of more than 900,000 news stories to test whether news can predict stock returns and found that daily news predicts stock returns for only one to two days, confirming previous research.
Journal ArticleDOI

Media Coverage of Firms: Background, Integration, and Directions for Future Research:

TL;DR: In this article, the authors focus on the media coverage of firms and the resulting literature is spread across multiple disciplines and, therefore, varies with regard to regard to the firms' performance.
Journal ArticleDOI

Media-expressed negative tone and firm-level stock returns

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors build a corpus of over 5½ million news articles on 20 large US firms over the 10-year period from January 2001 to December 2010, and use it to study the time-varying nature of the relation between media-expressed firm-specific tone and firm-level returns.
Journal ArticleDOI

The impact of firm prestige on executive compensation

TL;DR: The authors show that chief executive officers of prestigious firms earn less than those of less prestigious firms. But they also suggest that CEOs are willing to trade off status and career benefits from working for a publicly admired company against additional monetary compensation.
Journal ArticleDOI

Maxing Out Globally: Individualism, Investor Attention, and the Cross Section of Expected Stock Returns

Yong-Ho Cheon, +1 more
- 25 Sep 2017 - 
TL;DR: It is found that investors overpay for stocks with high MAX and that MAX-premium, the spread from long-short strategy based on low- and high-MAX stocks, is both statistically and economically significant worldwide.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds

TL;DR: In this article, the authors identify five common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds, including three stock-market factors: an overall market factor and factors related to firm size and book-to-market equity.
ReportDOI

A simple, positive semi-definite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix

Whitney K. Newey, +1 more
- 01 May 1987 - 
TL;DR: In this article, a simple method of calculating a heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix that is positive semi-definite by construction is described.
Journal ArticleDOI

Risk, Return, and Equilibrium: Empirical Tests

TL;DR: In this article, the relationship between average return and risk for New York Stock Exchange common stocks was tested using a two-parameter portfolio model and models of market equilibrium derived from the two parameter portfolio model.
Journal ArticleDOI

On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance

Mark M. Carhart
- 01 Mar 1997 - 
TL;DR: Using a sample free of survivor bias, this paper showed that common factors in stock returns and investment expenses almost completely explain persistence in equity mutual fund's mean and risk-adjusted returns.
Journal ArticleDOI

Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Stock Market Efficiency

TL;DR: In this article, the authors show that strategies that buy stocks that have performed well in the past and sell stocks that had performed poorly in past years generate significant positive returns over 3- to 12-month holding periods.
Related Papers (5)