scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: A primer with examples

TLDR
The standard nonparametric randomization and permutation testing ideas are developed at an accessible level, using practical examples from functional neuroimaging, and the extensions for multiple comparisons described.
Abstract
Requiring only minimal assumptions for validity, nonparametric permutation testing provides a flexible and intuitive methodology for the statistical analysis of data from functional neuroimaging experiments, at some computational expense. Introduced into the functional neuroimaging literature by Holmes et al. ([1996]: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 16:7-22), the permutation approach readily accounts for the multiple comparisons problem implicit in the standard voxel-by-voxel hypothesis testing framework. When the appropriate assumptions hold, the nonparametric permutation approach gives results similar to those obtained from a comparable Statistical Parametric Mapping approach using a general linear model with multiple comparisons corrections derived from random field theory. For analyses with low degrees of freedom, such as single subject PET/SPECT experiments or multi-subject PET/SPECT or fMRI designs assessed for population effects, the nonparametric approach employing a locally pooled (smoothed) variance estimate can outperform the comparable Statistical Parametric Mapping approach. Thus, these nonparametric techniques can be used to verify the validity of less computationally expensive parametric approaches. Although the theory and relative advantages of permutation approaches have been discussed by various authors, there has been no accessible explication of the method, and no freely distributed software implementing it. Consequently, there have been few practical applications of the technique. This article, and the accompanying MATLAB software, attempts to address these issues. The standard nonparametric randomization and permutation testing ideas are developed at an accessible level, using practical examples from functional neuroimaging, and the extensions for multiple comparisons described. Three worked examples from PET and fMRI are presented, with discussion, and comparisons with standard parametric approaches made where appropriate. Practical considerations are given throughout, and relevant statistical concepts are expounded in appendices.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data

TL;DR: This paper forms a null hypothesis and shows that the nonparametric test controls the false alarm rate under this null hypothesis, enabling neuroscientists to construct their own statistical test, maximizing the sensitivity to the expected effect.
Journal ArticleDOI

Tract-based spatial statistics: voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data.

TL;DR: TBSS aims to improve the sensitivity, objectivity and interpretability of analysis of multi-subject diffusion imaging studies by solving the question of how to align FA images from multiple subjects in a way that allows for valid conclusions to be drawn from the subsequent voxelwise analysis.
Journal Article

Standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA): technical details.

TL;DR: The technical details of the method are presented, allowing researchers to test, check, reproduce and validate the new method, and a solution reported here yields images of standardized current density with zero localization error.
Journal ArticleDOI

Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates

TL;DR: It is found that the most common software packages for fMRI analysis (SPM, FSL, AFNI) can result in false-positive rates of up to 70%.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present a general approach that accommodates most forms of experimental layout and ensuing analysis (designed experiments with fixed effects for factors, covariates and interaction of factors).
Book

Rank correlation methods

TL;DR: The measurement of rank correlation was introduced in this paper, and rank correlation tied ranks tests of significance were applied to the problem of m ranking, and variate values were used to measure rank correlation.
Book

The Design of Experiments

R. A. Fisher
Book ChapterDOI

Rank Correlation Methods

TL;DR: RankRank correlation coefficients as mentioned in this paper are statistical indices that measure the degree of association between two variables having ordered categories, and are defined such that a coefficient of zero means "no association" between the variables and a value of +1.0 or -1.
Journal ArticleDOI

Improved assessment of significant activation in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) : use of a cluster-size threshold

TL;DR: In this article, an alternative approach, which relies on the assumption that areas of true neural activity will tend to stimulate signal changes over contiguous pixels, is presented, which can improve statistical power by as much as fivefold over techniques that rely solely on adjusting per pixel false positive probabilities.
Related Papers (5)