Simulation results show that the combination of the proposed energy consumption scheduling design and the price predictor filter leads to significant reduction not only in users' payments but also in the resulting peak-to-average ratio in load demand for various load scenarios.
Abstract:
Real-time electricity pricing models can potentially lead to economic and environmental advantages compared to the current common flat rates. In particular, they can provide end users with the opportunity to reduce their electricity expenditures by responding to pricing that varies with different times of the day. However, recent studies have revealed that the lack of knowledge among users about how to respond to time-varying prices as well as the lack of effective building automation systems are two major barriers for fully utilizing the potential benefits of real-time pricing tariffs. We tackle these problems by proposing an optimal and automatic residential energy consumption scheduling framework which attempts to achieve a desired trade-off between minimizing the electricity payment and minimizing the waiting time for the operation of each appliance in household in presence of a real-time pricing tariff combined with inclining block rates. Our design requires minimum effort from the users and is based on simple linear programming computations. Moreover, we argue that any residential load control strategy in real-time electricity pricing environments requires price prediction capabilities. This is particularly true if the utility companies provide price information only one or two hours ahead of time. By applying a simple and efficient weighted average price prediction filter to the actual hourly-based price values used by the Illinois Power Company from January 2007 to December 2009, we obtain the optimal choices of the coefficients for each day of the week to be used by the price predictor filter. Simulation results show that the combination of the proposed energy consumption scheduling design and the price predictor filter leads to significant reduction not only in users' payments but also in the resulting peak-to-average ratio in load demand for various load scenarios. Therefore, the deployment of the proposed optimal energy consumption scheduling schemes is beneficial for both end users and utility companies.
TL;DR: An electricity load scheduling algorithm is proposed that controls the operation time and energy consumption of each appliance adapting to Time of Use (TOU) pricing and its operation andEnergy consumption characteristics to minimize the total electricity bill.
TL;DR: In this article, a chance-constrained model is proposed to find the optimal schedule and use robust optimization to characterize its solution and the associated uncertain parameters, and the effect of heterogeneous populations on the optimal solution while simultaneously determining the most appropriate classification for accurate predictions.
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors summarized recent R&D on electric springs and their potential functions for future smart grid, which can be associated with electric appliances, forming a new generation of smart loads which can adapt according to the availability of power from renewable energy sources.
TL;DR: This paper examines the previously suggested load scheduling programs and proposes a new practical one aimed at optimizing customers' bill cost and satisfaction by taking into consideration the generation capacity limitation and dynamic electricity price in different time slots of a day.
TL;DR: In this paper, an accurate energy consumption model of household appliances based on Set of Sequential Uninterruptible Energy Phases (SSUEP) is applied to day-ahead energy management framework of a residential microgrid in order to effectively activate time-based demand response programs.
TL;DR: In this article, the focus is on recognizing convex optimization problems and then finding the most appropriate technique for solving them, and a comprehensive introduction to the subject is given. But the focus of this book is not on the optimization problem itself, but on the problem of finding the appropriate technique to solve it.
TL;DR: In this article, the authors argue that the transition to a smart grid has to be evolutionary to keep the lights on; on the other hand, the issues surrounding the smart grid are signifi cant enough to demand major changes in power systems operating philosophy.
TL;DR: Simulation results confirm that the proposed distributed algorithm significantly reduces the peak-to-average-ratio (PAR) in load demand and the total cost in the system.
TL;DR: In this article, the authors proposed a two-period peak load problem under simplifying assumptions and showed that purely cost-based prices can be used to achieve optimal results, and some policy implications are discussed.
Q1. What contributions have the authors mentioned in the paper "Optimal residential load control with price prediction in real-time electricity pricing environments" ?
This is particularly true if the utility companies provide price information only one or two hours ahead of time.
Q2. What is the common scenario for a load reduction request?
Load reduction requests are usually sent out by the utilities when electricity demand is high enough to put the grid reliability at risk, or rising demand requires the imminent activation of expensive/unreliable generation sets.
Q3. What is the main reason why PHEVs are becoming popular?
As PHEVs become popular, there is an increasing interest in using the storage capacity of their batteries to return someenergy back to the grid when needed [37].
Q4. What are the benefits of real-time pricing?
Although real-time pricing has several potential advantages, its benefits are currently limited due to lack of efficient building automation systems as well as users’ difficulty in manually responding to time-varying prices.
Q5. How can the authors improve price prediction accuracy?
Price prediction accuracy can further improve by using longer and more computationally complicated price prediction filters, if needed.
Q6. How long does it take to charge a PHEV?
As another example, the user may select αa = 10 PM and βa = 7 AM (the next day) for his PHEV after plugging it in at night such that the battery charging finishes by early morning time when he needs to use the vehicle to go to work.
Q7. How can the user balance payment and wait time for each appliance?
Recall from Section II-C that the user can balance payment and waiting time for the operation of each household appliance by adjusting parameter δa for each appliance a.
Q8. Why is the price function ph(lh) not tractable?
Note that optimization problem (15) is not tractable in its current form due to the non-differentiability of the price function ph(lh) in (6).
Q9. What is the reformulated version of optimization problem for the case with multiple utility companies?
the reformulated version of optimization problem (25) for the case with multiple utility companies would still be a linear program.