scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Orienting the finger opposition space during prehension movements.

TLDR
Evidence is interpreted that when natural prehension occurs, pronation can be included in the motor plan without affecting the movement kinematics, when constraints are imposed on the movement execution as a consequence of a perturbation.
Abstract
Two experiments are reported that examined the act of prehension when subjects were asked to grasp with their thumb and index finger pads an elongated object resting horizontally on a surface and placed at different orientations with respect to the subject. In Experiment 1, the pad opposition preferences were determined for the six angles of orientation examined. For angles of 90 degrees (object parallel to frontal plane) or less, no rotation of the wrist (pronation) was used; for angles 110 degrees or greater, pronation was systematically employed to reorient the finger opposition space. Only one angle, 100 degrees , produced any evidence of ambiguity in how to grasp the object: Approximately 60% of these grasps involved pronation and 40% did not. Using the foregoing grasp preference data, in Experiment 2 we examined the kinematics of the wrist and elbow trajectories during prehension movements directed at an object in different orientations. Movement time, time to peak acceleration, velocity, and deceleration were measured. No kinematic differences were observed when the object orientation either required (110 degrees ) or did not require (80 degrees ) a pronation. By contrast, if the orientation was changed at the onset of the movement, such that an unpredicted pronation had to be introduced to achieve the grasp, kinematics were affected: Movement time was increased, and the time devoted to deceleration was lengthened. These data are interpreted as evidence that when natural prehension occurs, pronation can be included in the motor plan without affecting the movement kinematics. When constraints are imposed on the movement execution as a consequence of a perturbation, however, the introduction of a pronation component requires kinematic rearrangement.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The representing brain: Neural correlates of motor intention and imagery

TL;DR: A mechanism is proposed that is able to encode the desired goal of the action and is applicable to different levels of representational organization, as well as investigating the role of posterior parietal and premotor cortical areas in schema instantiation.
Journal ArticleDOI

Separate visual representations in the planning and control of action

TL;DR: Evidence for a dichotomy between the planning of an action and its on-line control in humans is reviewed and suggests that planning and control each serve a specialized purpose utilizing distinct visual representations.
Journal ArticleDOI

A new view on grasping

TL;DR: This model predicts how experimental variable such as object size, movement speed, fragility, and required accuracy will influence the timing and size of the maximum aperture of the hand and showed that the predicted influences correspond to human behavior.
Journal ArticleDOI

Role of the medial parieto-occipital cortex in the control of reaching and grasping movements

TL;DR: The picture emerging from data is that the medial parieto-occipital cortex is well equipped to control both proximal and distal movements in the online visuomotor guidance of prehension, and selective V6A lesions in monkey produce misreaching and misgrasping with the arm contralateral to the lesion in visually guided movements, suggesting that human and monkey superior parietal lobules are homologous structures.
Book ChapterDOI

Sensory Control of Dexterous Manipulation in Humans

TL;DR: This chapter elaborates the sensory control of dexterous manipulation in humans and finds that while the task evolves, somatosensory as well as other sources of information may then modify the ongoing behavior.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The prehensile movements of the human hand.

TL;DR: It is shown that movements of the hand consist of two basic patterns of movements which are termed precision grip and power grip, which appear to cover the whole range of prehensile activity of the human hand.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Timing of Natural Prehension Movements

TL;DR: Prehension movements were studied by film in 7 adult subjects and found that transportation of the hand to the target-object location had features very similar to any aiming arm movement, that is, it involved a fast-vel velocity initial phase and a low-velocity final phase.
Journal ArticleDOI

Optic ataxia: a specific disruption in visuomotor mechanisms. I. Different aspects of the deficit in reaching for objects.

TL;DR: The findings suggest that the 2 types of visuomotor mechanisms responsible for the proximal and distal components of visually-directed arm movements are controlled by the parietal cortex and that there should exist a hemisphere asymmetry in the functional organization of these mechanisms.
Journal ArticleDOI

Parietal cortex neurons of the monkey related to the visual guidance of hand movement

TL;DR: The results suggest that the hand-movement-related neurons of the parietal cortex are concerned with the visual guidance of the hand movement, especially in matching the pattern of movement with the spatial characteristics of the object to be manipulated.
Related Papers (5)