scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal Article

Pelvic organ prolapse in older women: Prevalence and risk factors

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
Some degree of prolapse is nearly ubiquitous in older women, which should be considered in the development of clinically relevant definitions of Prolapse.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We sought to estimate the prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse in ol der women using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification examination and to iden tify factors associated with prolapse. METHODS: Women with a uterus enrolled at one site of the Women's Health Initiative Hormone Replacement Therapy randomize d clinical trial were eligible for this ancillary cross-sectional study. Subjec ts underwent a Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification examination during a maximal Valsalva maneuver and in addition completed a questionnaire. Logistic regressio n was used to identify independent risk factors for each of 2 definitions of pro lapse: 1) Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification stage II or greater and 2) the le ading edge of prolapse measured at the hymen or below. RESULTS: In 270 participa nts, age (mean ±.SD) was 68.3 ±.5.6 years, body mass index was 30.4 ±6.2 kg/m 2, and vaginal parity (median [range]) was 3 (0-12). The proportions of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification stages (95%confidence intervals [CIs]) were stage 0, 2.3%(95%CI 0.8-4.8%); stage I, 33.0%(95%CI 27.4-39.0%); stage II, 62 .9%(95%CI 56.8-68.7%); and stage III, 1.9%(95%CI 0.6-4.3%). In 25.2%(95 %CI 20.1-30.8%), the leading edge of prolapse was at the hymen or below. Horm one therapy was not associated with prolapse (P = .9). On multivariable analysis , less education (odds ratio [OR]-2.16, 95%CI 1.10-4.24) and higher vaginal p arity (OR 1.61, 95%CI 1.03-2.50) were associated with prolapse when defined as stage II or greater. For prolapse defined by the leading edge at or below the h ymen, older age had a decreased risk (OR 0.50, 95%CI 0.27-0.92) and less educa tion, and larger babies had an increased risk (OR 2.38, 95%CI 1.31-4.32 and OR 1.97, 95%CI 1.07-3.64, respectively). CONCLUSION: Some degree of prolapse is nearly ubiquitous in older women, which should be considered in the development of clinically relevant definitions of prolapse. Risk factors for prolapse differ ed depending on the definition of prolapse used.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse symptoms and signs and their relation with bladder and bowel disorders in a general female population

TL;DR: In this paper, the prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) in the general female population was investigated. But, no association between POP and PFD was identified.
Journal ArticleDOI

Epidemiology of Pelvic Floor Dysfunction

TL;DR: The epidemiology of female pelvic floor disorders, including urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, anal incontinent, and interstitial cystitis/painful bladder syndrome is reviewed.
Journal ArticleDOI

Sexual function after vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence.

TL;DR: Sexual function was unchanged following vaginal reconstructive surgery despite anatomic and functional improvements; lack of benefit may be attributable to postoperative dyspareunia.
Journal ArticleDOI

Incidence of pelvic floor repair after hysterectomy: A population-based cohort study

TL;DR: Compared with women without prolapse, women who had a hysterectomy for prolapse were at increased risk for subsequent PFR, and future PFR was more frequently required inWomen who had prolapse.
Journal ArticleDOI

A comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal sacral colpopexy: objective outcome and perioperative differences

TL;DR: Patients undergoing laparoscopic and abdominal sacral colpopexy have comparable anatomical outcomes and operative times and laparoscopy affords a shorter hospital stay.
Related Papers (5)