scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Phytoplankton, nutrients, and turbidity in the Chesapeake, Delaware, and Hudson estuaries

TLDR
In this paper, the authors measured the distributions of turbidity, nutrients, and phytoplankton across the salinity gradients of three estuaries: Chesapeake Bay, Delaware Bay, and the Hudson river estuary.
Abstract
Estuaries receive continuous inputs of nutrients from their freshwater sources, but the fate of the inputs is poorly known. In order to document nutrient removal from the water column by phytoplankton, we measured the distributions of turbidity, nutrients, and phytoplankton across the salinity gradients of three estuaries: Chesapeake Bay, Delaware Bay, and the Hudson river estuary. Mixing diagrams were used to distinguish between conservative and non-conservative behavior; i.e. between loss from the water column and export to the estuarine plume on the shelf. In Chesapeake and Delaware Bays, we frequently observed a turbidity maximum in the oligohaline region, a chlorophyll maximum in clearer waters seaward of the turbidity maximum, and a nutrient-depleted zone at the highest salinities. In the Hudson River estuary, mixing diagrams were dominated by lateral waste inputs from New York City, and nutrient removal could not be estimated. In Chesapeake Bay, there was consistent removal of total N, nitrate, phosphate, and silicate from the water column, whereas in Delaware Bay, total N, ammonium, total P, and phosphate were removed. Total N and P removal in the Chesapeake and Delaware are estimated as ca. 50%, except for TP in the Chesapeake, which appeared to be conservative. Phytoplankton accumulation was associated with inorganic nutrient removal, suggesting that phytoplankton uptake was a major process responsible for nutrient removal. In the high salinity zone near and in the shelf plume, an index of nutrient limitation suggested no limitation in the Hudson, slight or no limitation in the Delaware, and widespread limitation in the Chesapeake, especially for P. These observations and information from the literature are summarized as a conceptual model of the chemical and biological structure of estuaries.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Harmful Algal Blooms and Eutrophication: Nutrient Sources, Composition, and Consequences

TL;DR: The relationship between harmful algal blooms and eutrophication of coastal waters from human activities has been investigated in this paper, focusing on sources of nutrients, known effects of nutrient loading and reduction, new understanding of pathways of nutrient acquisition among HAB species, and relationships between nutrients and toxic algae.
Journal ArticleDOI

Inputs, transformations, and transport of nitrogen and phosphorus in Chesapeake Bay and selected tributaries

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors assemble and analyze quantitative annual input-export budgets for total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) for Chesapeake Bay and three of its tributary estuaries (Potomac, Patuxent, and Choptank rivers).

Flux and Sources of Nutrients in the Mississippi-Atchafalaya River Basin

TL;DR: In this article, the authors address the following two questions: 1) What are the loads (flux) of nutrients transported from the Mississippi-Atchafalaya River Basin to the Gulf of Mexico, and where do they come from within the basin? 2) What is the relative importance of specific human activities, such as agriculture, point-source discharges, and atmospheric deposition in contributing to these loads?
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

New spectrophotometric equations for determining chlorophylls a, b, c1 and c2 in higher plants, algae and natural phytoplankton

TL;DR: New equations are presented for spectrophotometric determination of chlorophylls, based on revised extinction coefficients of chloropylls a, b, c1 and c2, which may be used for determining chlorophyLLs a and b in higher plants and green algae.