Propensity Score Methods for Confounding Control in Nonexperimental Research
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
Nonexperimental studies are increasingly used to investigate the safety and effectiveness of medical products as they are used in routine care, and confounding, systematic differences in prognosis between patients exposed to an intervention of interest and the selected comparator group is a primary challenge.Abstract:
Nonexperimental studies are increasingly used to investigate the safety and effectiveness of medical products as they are used in routine care. One of the primary challenges of such studies is confounding, systematic differences in prognosis between patients exposed to an intervention of interest and the selected comparator group. In the presence of uncontrolled confounding, any observed difference in outcome risk between the groups cannot be attributed solely to a causal effect of the exposure on the outcome.
Confounding in studies of medical products can arise from a variety of different sociomedical processes.1 The most common form of confounding arises from good medical practice, physicians prescribing medications and performing procedures on patients who are most likely to benefit from them. This leads to a bias known as confounding by indication, which can cause medical interventions to appear to cause events that they prevent.2,3 Conversely, patients who are perceived by a physician to be near the end of life may be less likely to receive preventive medications, leading to confounding by frailty or comorbidity.4–6 Additional sources of confounding bias can result from patients’ health-related behaviors. For example, patients who initiate a preventive medication may be more likely than other patients to engage in other healthy, prevention-oriented behaviors leading to bias known as the healthy user/adherer effect.7–9
Many statistical approaches can be used to remove the confounding effects of such factors if they are captured in the data. The most common statistical approaches for confounding control are based on multivariable regression models of the outcome. To yield unbiased estimates of treatment effects, these approaches require that the researcher correctly models the effect of the treatment and covariates on the outcome. However, correct specification of an outcome model can be challenging, particularly in studies …read more
Citations
More filters
Healthcare Utilization and Costs Associated With Direct-acting Antivirals for Patients With Substance Use Disorders and Chronic Hepatitis C
TL;DR: DAAs are associated with a significant decrease in the rate of SUD-related ED visits and liver-related costs without increasing the rates of all-cause costs among patients with SUD and HCV, suggesting that the benefits of DAAs extended beyond liver- related outcomes, especially in this disadvantaged population.
Journal ArticleDOI
Inverse probability weighting to estimate exposure effects on the burden of recurrent outcomes in the presence of competing events.
Charles Gaber,Jessie K. Edwards,Jennifer L. Lund,Anne F. Peery,David B Richardson,Alan C Kinlaw +5 more
TL;DR: In this article , the authors contextualize recurrent event parameters of interest using counterfactual theory in a causal inference framework and describe an approach for estimating a target parameter referred to as the mean cumulative count.
Journal ArticleDOI
Anesthesia Care Handovers and Risk of Adverse Outcomes.
TL;DR: A retrospective, population-based cohort study tested the hypothesis that anesthesia handoffs may be associated with adverse postoperative outcomes, and observed that handovers were associated with differences in 30-day outcomes.
Journal ArticleDOI
Association between the duration of diabetes and gram-negative bacterial infection in diabetic foot infections: a case-control study
TL;DR: In this paper , a case-control study was designed to explore the association between the duration of diabetes and gram-negative bacterial infection in diabetic foot infections (DFIs) in patients hospitalized in the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University between 2013 and 2019 with positive microbial culture results.
Journal ArticleDOI
Are the current colonoscopy recommendations for interval surveillance in patients with polyps enough? Machine learning-augmented propensity score cohort analysis of 1840 patients.
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors determined the prevalence of polyps upon surveillance colonoscopy in patients who have a history of adenomas on initial average-risk-screening, but then have a normal initial surveillance (second) colonoscopies between 2003 and 2017.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects
TL;DR: The authors discusses the central role of propensity scores and balancing scores in the analysis of observational studies and shows that adjustment for the scalar propensity score is sufficient to remove bias due to all observed covariates.
Journal ArticleDOI
Marginal Structural Models and Causal Inference in Epidemiology
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors introduce marginal structural models, a new class of causal models that allow for improved adjustment of confounding in observational studies with exposures or treatments that vary over time, when there exist time-dependent confounders that are also affected by previous treatment.
Journal ArticleDOI
Causal diagrams for epidemiologic research.
TL;DR: Causal diagrams can provide a starting point for identifying variables that must be measured and controlled to obtain unconfounded effect estimates and provide a method for critical evaluation of traditional epidemiologic criteria for confounding.
Journal ArticleDOI
Estimating Causal Effects from Large Data Sets Using Propensity Scores
TL;DR: Propensity score methods generalize subclassification in the presence of many confounding covariates, such as age, region of the country, and sex, in a study of smoking and mortality.
Journal ArticleDOI
A structural approach to selection bias.
TL;DR: This work argues that the causal structure underlying the bias in each example is essentially the same: conditioning on a common effect of 2 variables, one of which is either exposure or a cause of exposure and the other is either the outcome or acause of the outcome.