Propensity Score Methods for Confounding Control in Nonexperimental Research
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
Nonexperimental studies are increasingly used to investigate the safety and effectiveness of medical products as they are used in routine care, and confounding, systematic differences in prognosis between patients exposed to an intervention of interest and the selected comparator group is a primary challenge.Abstract:
Nonexperimental studies are increasingly used to investigate the safety and effectiveness of medical products as they are used in routine care. One of the primary challenges of such studies is confounding, systematic differences in prognosis between patients exposed to an intervention of interest and the selected comparator group. In the presence of uncontrolled confounding, any observed difference in outcome risk between the groups cannot be attributed solely to a causal effect of the exposure on the outcome.
Confounding in studies of medical products can arise from a variety of different sociomedical processes.1 The most common form of confounding arises from good medical practice, physicians prescribing medications and performing procedures on patients who are most likely to benefit from them. This leads to a bias known as confounding by indication, which can cause medical interventions to appear to cause events that they prevent.2,3 Conversely, patients who are perceived by a physician to be near the end of life may be less likely to receive preventive medications, leading to confounding by frailty or comorbidity.4–6 Additional sources of confounding bias can result from patients’ health-related behaviors. For example, patients who initiate a preventive medication may be more likely than other patients to engage in other healthy, prevention-oriented behaviors leading to bias known as the healthy user/adherer effect.7–9
Many statistical approaches can be used to remove the confounding effects of such factors if they are captured in the data. The most common statistical approaches for confounding control are based on multivariable regression models of the outcome. To yield unbiased estimates of treatment effects, these approaches require that the researcher correctly models the effect of the treatment and covariates on the outcome. However, correct specification of an outcome model can be challenging, particularly in studies …read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Oral Bisphosphonate Use and All-Cause Mortality in Patients With Moderate-Severe (Grade 3B-5D) Chronic Kidney Disease: A Population-Based Cohort Study.
Dunia Alarkawi,M Sanni Ali,Dana Bliuc,Natalia Pallares,Cristian Tebé,Leena Elhussein,Fergus Caskey,Nigel K Arden,Yoav Ben-Shlomo,Bo Abrahamsen,Bo Abrahamsen,Adolfo Diez-Perez,Julio Pascual,María José Pérez-Sáez,Andrew Judge,Andrew Judge,Andrew Judge,Cyrus Cooper,Cyrus Cooper,Muhammad Javaid,Muhammad Javaid,Daniel Prieto-Alhambra,Daniel Prieto-Alhambra +22 more
TL;DR: In this observational, patient‐based cohort study, oBPs were not associated with increased mortality among patients with moderate–severe CKD, however, further studies are needed on other effects of oB Ps in CKD patients.
Journal ArticleDOI
Evaluation of Association Between Oral and Topical Terbinafine Use in Pregnancy and Risk of Major Malformations and Spontaneous Abortion.
Niklas Worm Andersson,Niklas Worm Andersson,Simon Francis Thomsen,Jon Trærup Andersen,Jon Trærup Andersen +4 more
TL;DR: Among pregnancies exposed to oral or topical terbinafine, no increased risk of major malformations or spontaneous abortion was identified and the association between oral and topical ter binafine exposure in pregnancy and the risk ofMajor malformation and spontaneous abortion is examined.
Journal ArticleDOI
Association Between Paradoxical HDL Cholesterol Decrease and Risk of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients Initiated on Statin Treatment in a Primary Care Setting
Pål Hasvold,Pål Hasvold,Marcus Thuresson,Johan Sundström,Niklas Hammar,Sverre E. Kjeldsen,Sverre E. Kjeldsen,Gunnar Johansson,Ingar Holme,Johan Bodegard +9 more
TL;DR: Paradoxical statin-induced reduction in HDL-C was relatively common and was associated with increased risk of MACE, and Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate relative risks.
Journal ArticleDOI
Thienopyridine use after coronary stenting in low income patients enrolled in medicare part D receiving maintenance dialysis.
Tara I. Chang,Maria E. Montez-Rath,Jenny I. Shen,Matthew D. Solomon,Glenn M. Chertow,Wolfgang C. Winkelmayer,Wolfgang C. Winkelmayer +6 more
TL;DR: Data suggest that longer‐term thienopyridine use may be of benefit to patients on dialysis who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting, regardless of stent type.
Journal ArticleDOI
Physical activity and associated medical cost savings among at-risk older adults participating a community-based health & wellness program.
Samuel D. Towne,Yajuan Li,Shinduk Lee,Matthew Lee Smith,Matthew Lee Smith,Gang Han,Cindy Quinn,Yuxian Du,Mark E. Benden,Marcia G. Ory +9 more
TL;DR: This intervention was able to reach and retain older adults and showed significant MVPA gains and estimated medical cost savings among more at-risk individuals (baseline <150 MVPA) and can be used in practice as a strategy to improve MVPA among the growing population of older community-dwelling adults.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects
TL;DR: The authors discusses the central role of propensity scores and balancing scores in the analysis of observational studies and shows that adjustment for the scalar propensity score is sufficient to remove bias due to all observed covariates.
Journal ArticleDOI
Marginal Structural Models and Causal Inference in Epidemiology
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors introduce marginal structural models, a new class of causal models that allow for improved adjustment of confounding in observational studies with exposures or treatments that vary over time, when there exist time-dependent confounders that are also affected by previous treatment.
Journal ArticleDOI
Causal diagrams for epidemiologic research.
TL;DR: Causal diagrams can provide a starting point for identifying variables that must be measured and controlled to obtain unconfounded effect estimates and provide a method for critical evaluation of traditional epidemiologic criteria for confounding.
Journal ArticleDOI
Estimating Causal Effects from Large Data Sets Using Propensity Scores
TL;DR: Propensity score methods generalize subclassification in the presence of many confounding covariates, such as age, region of the country, and sex, in a study of smoking and mortality.
Journal ArticleDOI
A structural approach to selection bias.
TL;DR: This work argues that the causal structure underlying the bias in each example is essentially the same: conditioning on a common effect of 2 variables, one of which is either exposure or a cause of exposure and the other is either the outcome or acause of the outcome.