scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessDOI

Proximity effect of spring cereals and legumes in strip intercropping. part ii. response of pea to the proximity of wheat, triticale, barley, and yellow lupine

TLDR
In this paper, the results of field experiments on mixed sowings carried out in the years 2008-2010 at Mochelek near Bydgoszcz (53°13’ N; 17°51’ E) were used.
Abstract
Background. Strip intercropping brings together the advantages of pure sowing and intercropping, but its production value depends on the reciprocal effect of the various species at the contact point of neighbouring rows of different plant species. The aim of the experiments was to find out the response of spring barley to the neighbouring occurrence of spring wheat, spring triticale, pea and yellow lupine and to estimate the production effects of strip intercropping of barley in the proximity of those species.  Material and methods. In this study, the results of field experiments on mixed sowings carried out in the years 2008–2010 at Mochelek near Bydgoszcz (53°13’ N; 17°51’ E) were used. Experimental factor was the position of plant row on the plot: four rows into the plot away from the respective neighbouring species. First row (contact row) was situated 12.5 cm away from the first row of the respective neighbouring species. Experimental unit was subsequent plant rows, each 4 meters long. Results. Proximity of spring wheat and spring triticale was unfavourable to the growth and yield of spring barley, especially in the row directly adjacent to the field with the above species. No significant effect was found of the vicinity of pea to spring barley plants. Estimated decrease in barley yield in strip intercropping, with 3-m-wide strips and bilateral proximity of wheat, triticale and pea, would amount to 2.76%, 4.25% and 3.21%, respectively. However, the direct neighbourhood of yellow lupine caused a slight increase in the plant mass, including straw, the number of grains per spike and grain yield, but only in the first row. Estimated increase in the yield of spring barley grown in strip intercropping with yellow lupine, with 3-m- -wide strips, was small and would amount to only 0.58%. Conclusion. Selection of plant species adjacent to spring barley in strip intercropping has a significant effect on results of its cultivation.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Proximity effect of spring cereals and legumes in strip intercropping. part iv. response of triticale to the proximity of wheat, barley, pea and yellow lupine

TL;DR: In this paper, the results of field experiments conducted as part of research on mixed sowings carried out in 2008-2010 in Mochelek near Bydgoszcz (53o13' N; 17o51' E).
Journal ArticleDOI

Response of Yellow Lupine to the Proximity of Other Plants and Unplanted Path in Strip Intercropping

TL;DR: It was determined that yellow lupine was most intolerant of barley and least affected by the proximity of peas, and strip intercropping presented a viable alternative for the production effect.

Competition between oat and yellow lupine in mixtures of these species part ii. intensity of competition depending on species ratio in mixture

TL;DR: In this paper, the results of two-factorial field experiment conducted in 2002, 2004 and 2005 at the Research Station Mocheek near Bydgoszcz (53 o 13' N; 17 o 51' E) were applied to estimate mutual interactions between oat and yellow lupine.
Journal Article

Intercropping as an example of sustainable organic agricultural systems

TL;DR: It was established that the vegetable crops (pepper, onion, salad beetroot, and celery) and the essential oil crop (basil) had a positive reaction to the applied fertilization with the biofertilizer Hemozym Bio No. 5, as the results showed higher values of the yields for all crops as compared to the non-fERTilized control variants of the same.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Interspecific competition, n use and interference with weeds in pea-barley intercropping

TL;DR: Pea-barley intercropping seems to be a promising practise of protein production in cropping system with high weed pressures and low levels of available N.
Journal ArticleDOI

Processes determining intercrop productivity and yields of component crops

TL;DR: This review examines how intercrop productivity is determined, by analysing several key physiological processes which affect yields of component crops, and identifies more appropriate agronomic manipulations and cultivars for intercrops.
Journal ArticleDOI

Interspecific Competition for Soil N and its Interaction with N2 Fixation, Leaf Expansion and Crop Growth in Pea–Barley Intercrops

TL;DR: The key role of competition for soil N which occurs early in the crop cycle and greatly influences the subsequent growth and final performance of both species is demonstrated.
Journal ArticleDOI

Growth of soybean seedlings in relay strip intercropping systems in relation to light quantity and red:far-red ratio

TL;DR: In this article, the differences in the light environment of the soybean canopy in terms of the red:far-red (R/FR) ratio and the photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) as well as the different rates of soybean seedling growth under maize-soybean relay strip intercropping and soybean sole planting were investigated.
Journal ArticleDOI

Changes in light environment, morphology, growth and yield of soybean in maize-soybean intercropping systems

TL;DR: The results showed that at soybean flowering stage, the R:FR ratio at the top of soybean canopy was reduced 17–21% more than the photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) under intercropping compared to monoculture, with 15–19% more reduction under 1M1S than 2M2S, and the reduction in grain yield was mainly caused by the reduced number of grains produced by the intercropped soybean plants, while the grain size remained unchanged.
Related Papers (5)