scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Reliability of Clinician Erythema Assessment grading scale

TLDR
The CEA had high interrater reliability and good intrarater reliability with an overall intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and was a reliable scale for measuring the facial erythema of rosacea when used by trained raters.
Abstract
Background Facial erythema is a clinical hallmark of rosacea and often causes social and psychological distress Although facial erythema assessments are a common endpoint in rosacea clinical trials, their reliability has not been evaluated Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate the inter- and intrarater reliability of the Clinician's Erythema Assessment (CEA), a 5-point grading scale of facial erythema severity Methods Twelve board-certified dermatologists, previously trained on use of the scale, rated erythema of 28 rosacea subjects twice on the same day Interrater and intrarater agreement was assessed with the intraclass correlation and κ statistic Results The CEA had high interrater reliability and good intrarater reliability with an overall intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for session 1 and session 2 of 0601 and 0576, respectively; the overall weighted κ statistic for session 1 and session 2 was 0692 Limitations Raters were experienced dermatologists and there may be a risk of recall bias Conclusion When used by trained raters, CEA is a reliable scale for measuring the facial erythema of rosacea

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Standard classification and pathophysiology of rosacea: The 2017 update by the National Rosacea Society Expert Committee

TL;DR: In 2002, the National Rosacea Society assembled an expert committee to develop the first standard classification of rosacea, which was intended to provide clearer parameters to conduct investigations, guide diagnosis, and improve treatment.
Journal ArticleDOI

Interventions for rosacea.

TL;DR: Two topical treatments, metronidazole and azelaic acid, were shown to be more effective than placebo in papulopustular rosacea (moderate quality evidence for metRONidazoles and high for azelaoic acid) and pooled data from physician assessments in three trials demonstrated that metronIDazole was more effective compared to placebo.
Journal ArticleDOI

COVID-19 related masks increase severity of both acne (maskne) and rosacea (mask rosacea): Multi-center, real-life, telemedical, and observational prospective study.

TL;DR: In this article, the authors evaluated mask-related rosacea and acne (maskne) in untreated patients during lockdown at least 6 h/day. And they found that after 6 weeks of mask and quarantine, patients with acne displayed an increased Global Acne Grading Scale (GAGS) score in maskrelated areas (P < 0001).
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data

TL;DR: A general statistical methodology for the analysis of multivariate categorical data arising from observer reliability studies is presented and tests for interobserver bias are presented in terms of first-order marginal homogeneity and measures of interob server agreement are developed as generalized kappa-type statistics.
Journal ArticleDOI

Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability.

TL;DR: In this article, the authors present guidelines for choosing among six different forms of the intraclass correlation for reliability studies in which n target are rated by k judges, and the confidence intervals for each of the forms are reviewed.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments.

P. Armitage, +1 more
- 01 Dec 1987 - 
Book

The design and analysis of clinical experiments

TL;DR: The Parallel Groups Design as mentioned in this paper is a special case of the Parallel Groups Study, and it is used to control for prognostic variables in linear regression analysis of linear regressions of linear models.
Journal ArticleDOI

The eczema area and severity index (EASI): assessment of reliability in atopic dermatitis

TL;DR: In this paper, the reliability of the EASI scoring system was evaluated by assessing inter-and intra-observer consistency, and the results indicated that the evaluators assessed the patients consistently across both study days.
Related Papers (5)