scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

The diabetic foot: consequences of delayed treatment and referral.

Joseph L. Mills, +2 more
- 01 Aug 1991 - 
- Vol. 84, Iss: 8, pp 970-974
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The pathophysiology of foot problems in diabetic patients is poorly understood by many physicians, and delays in appropriate treatment with subsequent limb loss are failure to appreciate the presence and severity of underlying infection and attribution of gangrene of the toe and forefoot to microvascular disease.
Abstract
The pathophysiology of foot problems in diabetic patients is poorly understood by many physicians. Two major factors that frequently lead to a delay in appropriate treatment with subsequent limb loss are failure to appreciate the presence and severity of underlying infection and attribution of gangrene of the toe and forefoot to microvascular disease. To evaluate the consequences of delayed recognition and treatment, we reviewed the records of 55 diabetic patients with localized gangrene or infection of the forefoot in 62 limbs, treated consecutively on a single vascular surgical service over a 2-year period using a standard protocol. All appropriately treated neuropathic ulcers and forefoot infections healed in patients with palpable pedal pulses. If foot pulses were absent and arteriography confirmed large-vessel occlusive disease, foot lesions and infections likewise healed if concomitant revascularization was done. In our series, 33 bypasses were required because of severe atherosclerotic occlusive disease. Only one patient had "unreconstructable" arterial disease. Limb salvage was 86% at a mean follow-up of 12.4 months. In 16 of the patients (29%), there was a prolonged delay between initial treatment and referral for definitive care. The specific causes of delay were underestimation of the severity of foot infection in 10 patients, and lack of recognition of ischemia due to large-vessel occlusive disease in six. These delays led to more proximal levels of amputation in six patients, including three below-knee amputations in patients with limbs that were initially salvageable.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Diabetic Foot Disorders: A Clinical Practice Guideline (2006 Revision)

TL;DR: A clinical practice guideline for diabetic foot disorders is presented based on currently available evidence, committee consensus, and current clinical practice and provides evidence-based guidance for general patterns of practice.
Journal Article

Diabetic foot disorders: A clinical practice guideline

TL;DR: A Clinical Practice Guideline for diabetic foot disorders based on currently available evidence is presented to provide evidencebased guidance for general patterns of practice and the goal of a major reduction in diabetic limb amputations is certainly possible.
Journal ArticleDOI

What is the most effective way to reduce incidence of amputation in the diabetic foot

TL;DR: A multidisciplinary approach including preventive strategy, patient and staff education, and multifactorial treatment of foot ulcers has been reported to reduce the amputation rate by more than 50%.
Journal ArticleDOI

Salvage, with arthrodesis, in intractable diabetic neuropathic arthropathy of the foot and ankle.

TL;DR: Twenty-nine patients who had diabetic neuropathic arthropathy of the foot and ankle were managed with open reduction and arthrodesis of various joints, and salvage was successful in twenty-seven (93 per cent) of the twenty-29 patients.
Journal ArticleDOI

Health-economic consequences of diabetic foot lesions.

TL;DR: Prevention of foot ulcers and amputations by various methods, including patient education, proper footwear, and foot care, in patients at risk is cost effective or even cost saving.
Related Papers (5)