scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal Article

The effect of collagen removal and the use of a low-viscosity resin liner on marginal adaptation of resin composite restorations with margins in dentin.

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
This study evaluated the influence of collagen removal and the use of a low-viscosity liner on the marginal quality of composite restorations for the total-etch system, Prime & Bond 2.1 and the self-etching primer system, Clearfil SE Bond, in high C-factor cavities with margins in dentin.
Abstract
This study evaluated the influence of collagen removal and the use of a low-viscosity liner on the marginal quality of composite restorations for the total-etch system, Prime & Bond 2.1 (PB) and the self-etching primer system, Clearfil SE Bond (CSEB), in high C-factor cavities with margins in dentin. High C-factor cavities were made on dentin exposed from ground labial surfaces of 100 bovine lower incisors, randomly assigned to 10 treatment groups and restored with composite Z 250, placed in bulk. In Group 1 (PB), control group, PB was applied according to the manufacturer's directions; in Group 2 (PB/PLF), an intermediate layer of low-viscosity composite Protect Liner F (PLF) was applied on the bonding resin surface; in Group 3 (PB/SH) following acid-etching, the surfaces were treated with 10% sodium hypochlorite (SH) for one minute and in Group 4 (PB/SH/PLF), the same procedure was conducted as for Group 3, plus an intermediate layer of PLF was applied as for Group 2. In Group 5 (CSEB), the control group, CSEB was applied according to the manufacturer's directions; in Group 6 (CSEB/PLF), an intermediate layer of PLF was applied; in Group 7 (SH/CSEB), the cavity surface was pre-treated with SH; in Group 8 (SH/CSEB/PLF), SH pre-treatment was conducted as for Group 7, then an intermediate layer of PLF was applied; in Group 9 (CSEB/SH), after CSEB-primer application, the surface was treated with SH, followed by CSEB-adhesive application and in Group 10 (CSEB/SH/PLF), the same was conducted as for Group 9, then an intermediate layer of PLF was applied. The specimens were stored at 37 degrees C for 24 hours, polished, molded and replicas were obtained in epoxy resin. The replicas were gold-sputter coated and observed by SEM (300x) for marginal quality classification. The Kruskal-Wallis non-parametrical multi-comparison Test (p<0.05) was used to obtain statistical analysis of the data. Results demonstrated that both adhesive systems in the control groups presented low marginal quality and a high variability. The use of an intermediate layer of PLF significantly improved the marginal quality with the CSEB system but had no effect with the PB system. Collagen depletion with SH enhanced marginal quality for the PB system and did not influence the CSEB system results.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Dental adhesion: mechanism, techniques and durability.

TL;DR: The fundamental process of adhesion to enamel and dentin with different adhesive techniques, factors affecting the long-term bonding performance of modern adhesives and the current perspectives for improving bond durability are discussed.
Journal ArticleDOI

Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite.

TL;DR: The results of this study indicated that a previous sealing of dentin using the adhesive system, followed by a second application just before the cementation, is an effective alternative technique, since it maintains the marginal adaptation of indirect composite resin restorations, and improves the bond strength at the interface on buccal walls, which are the most critical regions for the long-term durability of these procedures.
Journal ArticleDOI

Comparative radiopacity of four low- viscosity composites

TL;DR: Evaluating the radiopacity of four commercially available low-viscosity composites found them to be acceptable according to the ISO Standard 4049, but Natural Flow and Protect Liner F did not supply the requirements for Radiopacity, thus, these materials could be confounded with secondary caries in some clinical applications.
Journal ArticleDOI

Three-year clinical evaluation of two nano-hybrid giomer restorative composites

TL;DR: Beautifil Flow Plus F00 (zero flow) restorative material achieved clinically better significant acceptable results than Beautiful II after three years of service in conservative class I cavities.
Journal ArticleDOI

Effect of various surface treatments on the microleakage and ultrastructure of resin-tooth interface.

TL;DR: This study evaluated the effect of collagen removal and sodium ascorbate treatment of acid-etched dentin on the microleakage and ultrastructure of resin-tooth interface under moist and dry conditions using an acetone-based 1 bottle adhesive system.
Related Papers (5)