scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessPosted Content

The Effect of Sensor Fusion on Data-Driven Learning of Koopman Operators.

TLDR
In this paper, the authors propose output constrained Koopman operators (OC-KOs) as a new framework to fuse two measurement sets, where output measurements are nonlinear, non-invertible functions of the system state.
Abstract
Dictionary methods for system identification typically rely on one set of measurements to learn governing dynamics of a system. In this paper, we investigate how fusion of output measurements with state measurements affects the dictionary selection process in Koopman operator learning problems. While prior methods use dynamical conjugacy to show a direct link between Koopman eigenfunctions in two distinct data spaces (measurement channels), we explore the specific case where output measurements are nonlinear, non-invertible functions of the system state. This setup reflects the measurement constraints of many classes of physical systems, e.g., biological measurement data, where one type of measurement does not directly transform to another. We propose output constrained Koopman operators (OC-KOs) as a new framework to fuse two measurement sets. We show that OC-KOs are effective for sensor fusion by proving that when learning a Koopman operator, output measurement functions serve to constrain the space of potential Koopman observables and their eigenfunctions. Further, low-dimensional output measurements can be embedded to inform selection of Koopman dictionary functions for high-dimensional models. We propose two algorithms to identify OC-KO representations directly from data: a direct optimization method that uses state and output data simultaneously and a sequential optimization method. We prove a theorem to show that the solution spaces of the two optimization problems are equivalent. We illustrate these findings with a theoretical example and two numerical simulations.

read more

Citations
More filters
Posted Content

An introduction to extended dynamic mode decomposition: Estimation of the Koopman operator and outputs.

TL;DR: In this article, the Koopman operator is shown as a projection onto some finite-dimensional function space without assumptions of its invariance to the action of the koopman operators or spanning the outputs which is the basis for the extended dynamic mode decomposition (EDMD) algorithm.
Posted Content

Extending dynamic mode decomposition to data from multiple outputs.

TL;DR: In this paper, an extended dynamic mode decomposition (EDM decomposition) algorithm is proposed to approximate the desired observables and their iterates in time using minimizers of regularized least-squares problems which have analytic solutions with heuristic provisions for expected estimates.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function

TL;DR: It is demonstrated that finite linear combinations of compositions of a fixed, univariate function and a set of affine functionals can uniformly approximate any continuous function ofn real variables with support in the unit hypercube.
Journal ArticleDOI

RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics

TL;DR: The RNA-Seq approach to transcriptome profiling that uses deep-sequencing technologies provides a far more precise measurement of levels of transcripts and their isoforms than other methods.
Journal Article

Adaptive Subgradient Methods for Online Learning and Stochastic Optimization

TL;DR: This work describes and analyze an apparatus for adaptively modifying the proximal function, which significantly simplifies setting a learning rate and results in regret guarantees that are provably as good as the best proximal functions that can be chosen in hindsight.
Journal ArticleDOI

Dynamic mode decomposition of numerical and experimental data

TL;DR: In this article, a method is introduced that is able to extract dynamic information from flow fields that are either generated by a (direct) numerical simulation or visualized/measured in a physical experiment.
Book

Microsystem Design

TL;DR: In this article, a minor numerical error in going from Eq. 16.39 to eq.16.40 is found, which has an obvious effect on the calculations that follow, increasing the minimum detectable temperature change to about 2 mK.
Related Papers (5)