scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

The great time series classification bake off: a review and experimental evaluation of recent algorithmic advances

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
This work implemented 18 recently proposed algorithms in a common Java framework and compared them against two standard benchmark classifiers (and each other) by performing 100 resampling experiments on each of the 85 datasets, indicating that only nine of these algorithms are significantly more accurate than both benchmarks.
Abstract
In the last 5 years there have been a large number of new time series classification algorithms proposed in the literature. These algorithms have been evaluated on subsets of the 47 data sets in the University of California, Riverside time series classification archive. The archive has recently been expanded to 85 data sets, over half of which have been donated by researchers at the University of East Anglia. Aspects of previous evaluations have made comparisons between algorithms difficult. For example, several different programming languages have been used, experiments involved a single train/test split and some used normalised data whilst others did not. The relaunch of the archive provides a timely opportunity to thoroughly evaluate algorithms on a larger number of datasets. We have implemented 18 recently proposed algorithms in a common Java framework and compared them against two standard benchmark classifiers (and each other) by performing 100 resampling experiments on each of the 85 datasets. We use these results to test several hypotheses relating to whether the algorithms are significantly more accurate than the benchmarks and each other. Our results indicate that only nine of these algorithms are significantly more accurate than both benchmarks and that one classifier, the collective of transformation ensembles, is significantly more accurate than all of the others. All of our experiments and results are reproducible: we release all of our code, results and experimental details and we hope these experiments form the basis for more robust testing of new algorithms in the future.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Evaluation of time series artificial intelligence models for real-time/near-real-time methane prediction in coal mines

TL;DR: In this paper , the authors evaluate artificial intelligence systems for predicting near-real-time explosion hazards in underground coal mine ventilation where methane explosion hazards can develop, and they demonstrate that near real-time decision-making for explosive hazard warning systems is accurate and robust, and artificial intelligence modeling of explosion hazards enhances mine safety.
Posted ContentDOI

Building Large-Scale Registries from Unstructured Clinical Notes using a Low-Resource Natural Language Processing Pipeline

TL;DR: This paper proposed SE-K, an efficient and interpretable classification approach for extracting information from clinical notes, and show that it outperforms current state-of-the-art models in text classification.
Journal ArticleDOI

Time Series Shapelet-Based Movement Intention Detection Toward Asynchronous BCI for Stroke Rehabilitation

TL;DR: The proposed algorithm does not only provide competitive performance to state-of-the-art algorithms in terms of TPR, but also maintain low FPs/min and DL, which is low enough to induce effective brain plasticity for neurorehabilitation.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

FormerTime: Hierarchical Multi-Scale Representations for Multivariate Time Series Classification

TL;DR: In this paper , an efficient temporal reduction attention layer and a well-informed contextual positional encoding generating strategy are designed for multivariate time series classification (MTSC) task by employing a hierarchical network architecture to perform multi-scale feature maps.
Posted Content

Detecting Electric Devices in 3D Images of Bags.

TL;DR: An algorithm, Unpack, Predict, eXtract, Repack (UXPR), which involves unpacking through segmenting the data at a range of scales using an algorithm known as the Sieve, predicting whether a segment is electrical or not based on the histogram of voxel intensities, then repacking the bag by ensembling the segments and predictions to identify the devices in bags.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The WEKA data mining software: an update

TL;DR: This paper provides an introduction to the WEKA workbench, reviews the history of the project, and, in light of the recent 3.6 stable release, briefly discusses what has been added since the last stable version (Weka 3.4) released in 2003.
Journal Article

Statistical Comparisons of Classifiers over Multiple Data Sets

TL;DR: A set of simple, yet safe and robust non-parametric tests for statistical comparisons of classifiers is recommended: the Wilcoxon signed ranks test for comparison of two classifiers and the Friedman test with the corresponding post-hoc tests for comparisons of more classifiers over multiple data sets.
Book ChapterDOI

Domain-adversarial training of neural networks

TL;DR: In this article, a new representation learning approach for domain adaptation is proposed, in which data at training and test time come from similar but different distributions, and features that cannot discriminate between the training (source) and test (target) domains are used to promote the emergence of features that are discriminative for the main learning task on the source domain.
Journal ArticleDOI

Experiencing SAX: a novel symbolic representation of time series

TL;DR: The utility of the new symbolic representation of time series formed is demonstrated, which allows dimensionality/numerosity reduction, and it also allows distance measures to be defined on the symbolic approach that lower bound corresponding distance measuresdefined on the original series.
Journal ArticleDOI

Querying and mining of time series data: experimental comparison of representations and distance measures

TL;DR: An extensive set of time series experiments are conducted re-implementing 8 different representation methods and 9 similarity measures and their variants and testing their effectiveness on 38 time series data sets from a wide variety of application domains to provide a unified validation of some of the existing achievements.
Related Papers (5)