scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

The great time series classification bake off: a review and experimental evaluation of recent algorithmic advances

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
This work implemented 18 recently proposed algorithms in a common Java framework and compared them against two standard benchmark classifiers (and each other) by performing 100 resampling experiments on each of the 85 datasets, indicating that only nine of these algorithms are significantly more accurate than both benchmarks.
Abstract
In the last 5 years there have been a large number of new time series classification algorithms proposed in the literature. These algorithms have been evaluated on subsets of the 47 data sets in the University of California, Riverside time series classification archive. The archive has recently been expanded to 85 data sets, over half of which have been donated by researchers at the University of East Anglia. Aspects of previous evaluations have made comparisons between algorithms difficult. For example, several different programming languages have been used, experiments involved a single train/test split and some used normalised data whilst others did not. The relaunch of the archive provides a timely opportunity to thoroughly evaluate algorithms on a larger number of datasets. We have implemented 18 recently proposed algorithms in a common Java framework and compared them against two standard benchmark classifiers (and each other) by performing 100 resampling experiments on each of the 85 datasets. We use these results to test several hypotheses relating to whether the algorithms are significantly more accurate than the benchmarks and each other. Our results indicate that only nine of these algorithms are significantly more accurate than both benchmarks and that one classifier, the collective of transformation ensembles, is significantly more accurate than all of the others. All of our experiments and results are reproducible: we release all of our code, results and experimental details and we hope these experiments form the basis for more robust testing of new algorithms in the future.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Detection of lost circulation in drilling wells employing sensor data using machine learning technique

TL;DR: The accuracy of the developed algorithm for wells is 79%, and it can be useful in the detection of the lost circulation in the drilling wells, and the logistic regression model showed the best results.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Fast Adaptive Similarity Search through Variance-Aware Quantization

TL;DR: A Variance-Aware Quantization (VAQ) method to encode data by intelligently adapting dictionary sizes to subspaces to alleviate significant drawbacks of hardware-accelerated quantization methods.
Posted Content

A tale of two toolkits, report the first: benchmarking time series classification algorithms for correctness and efficiency.

TL;DR: There is significant difference in accuracy on only one of the six algorithms in sktime, but a much wider range of difference in efficiency is found, which highlights ways both toolkits could be improved.
Journal ArticleDOI

A Case Driven Study of the Use of Time Series Classification for Flexibility in Industry 4.0

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors show that satisfactory results can be obtained only at the expense of the human expertise (i.e., in the industrial process and in the ML process).
Journal ArticleDOI

Reducing CACC Platoon Disturbances Caused by State Jitters by Combining Two Stages Driving State Recognition With Multiple Platoons’ Strategies and Risk Prediction

TL;DR: In this article , the authors proposed a framework which combines recognition of driving states with platoon operations and risk-prediction in order to reduce disturbance and unnecessary platoon operations resulting from driving-state jitters.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The WEKA data mining software: an update

TL;DR: This paper provides an introduction to the WEKA workbench, reviews the history of the project, and, in light of the recent 3.6 stable release, briefly discusses what has been added since the last stable version (Weka 3.4) released in 2003.
Journal Article

Statistical Comparisons of Classifiers over Multiple Data Sets

TL;DR: A set of simple, yet safe and robust non-parametric tests for statistical comparisons of classifiers is recommended: the Wilcoxon signed ranks test for comparison of two classifiers and the Friedman test with the corresponding post-hoc tests for comparisons of more classifiers over multiple data sets.
Book ChapterDOI

Domain-adversarial training of neural networks

TL;DR: In this article, a new representation learning approach for domain adaptation is proposed, in which data at training and test time come from similar but different distributions, and features that cannot discriminate between the training (source) and test (target) domains are used to promote the emergence of features that are discriminative for the main learning task on the source domain.
Journal ArticleDOI

Experiencing SAX: a novel symbolic representation of time series

TL;DR: The utility of the new symbolic representation of time series formed is demonstrated, which allows dimensionality/numerosity reduction, and it also allows distance measures to be defined on the symbolic approach that lower bound corresponding distance measuresdefined on the original series.
Journal ArticleDOI

Querying and mining of time series data: experimental comparison of representations and distance measures

TL;DR: An extensive set of time series experiments are conducted re-implementing 8 different representation methods and 9 similarity measures and their variants and testing their effectiveness on 38 time series data sets from a wide variety of application domains to provide a unified validation of some of the existing achievements.
Related Papers (5)