scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

The great time series classification bake off: a review and experimental evaluation of recent algorithmic advances

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
This work implemented 18 recently proposed algorithms in a common Java framework and compared them against two standard benchmark classifiers (and each other) by performing 100 resampling experiments on each of the 85 datasets, indicating that only nine of these algorithms are significantly more accurate than both benchmarks.
Abstract
In the last 5 years there have been a large number of new time series classification algorithms proposed in the literature. These algorithms have been evaluated on subsets of the 47 data sets in the University of California, Riverside time series classification archive. The archive has recently been expanded to 85 data sets, over half of which have been donated by researchers at the University of East Anglia. Aspects of previous evaluations have made comparisons between algorithms difficult. For example, several different programming languages have been used, experiments involved a single train/test split and some used normalised data whilst others did not. The relaunch of the archive provides a timely opportunity to thoroughly evaluate algorithms on a larger number of datasets. We have implemented 18 recently proposed algorithms in a common Java framework and compared them against two standard benchmark classifiers (and each other) by performing 100 resampling experiments on each of the 85 datasets. We use these results to test several hypotheses relating to whether the algorithms are significantly more accurate than the benchmarks and each other. Our results indicate that only nine of these algorithms are significantly more accurate than both benchmarks and that one classifier, the collective of transformation ensembles, is significantly more accurate than all of the others. All of our experiments and results are reproducible: we release all of our code, results and experimental details and we hope these experiments form the basis for more robust testing of new algorithms in the future.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Explainable AI for Time Series Classification: A Review, Taxonomy and Research Directions

- 01 Jan 2022 - 
TL;DR: In this article , the authors present an extensive literature review on explainable AI for time series classification, categorize the research field through a taxonomy subdividing the methods into time points-based, subsequences-based and instance-based.
Journal ArticleDOI

A novel neural network based on dynamic time warping and Kalman filter for real-time monitoring of supersonic inlet flow patterns

TL;DR: Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed DTW-SLFN-KF network has better comprehensive performance for monitoring the flow patterns of supersonic inlet in terms of monitoring accuracy and real-time performance when compared with other competitive methods.
Journal ArticleDOI

TrSAX-An improved time series symbolic representation for classification.

TL;DR: An improved symbolic representation is proposed by integrating SAX with the least squares method to describe the time series' mean value and trend information by comparing the classifiers using the original SAX, two improved SAX representations and another two classifiers that are highly representative and competitive for short time series classification.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Shepard Interpolation Neural Networks with K-Means: A Shallow Learning Method for Time Series Classification

TL;DR: This work proposes Shepard Interpolation Neural Networks (SINN), a shallow learning architecture approach for deep learning tasks based on a statistical interpolation technique rather than a biological brain, which outperforms the other state-of-the-art algorithms on the popular UCR time series classification benchmark data set and outperforms LSTMs on data sets which have significantly smaller training data than testing.
Journal ArticleDOI

Periodic Time Series Data Analysis by Deep Learning Methodology

TL;DR: A convolutional neural network (CNN) based period classification algorithm, named PCA, to detect the dataset periods and it is observed that the PCA is capable of achieving 100% accuracy in the case of low noise PTSD.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The WEKA data mining software: an update

TL;DR: This paper provides an introduction to the WEKA workbench, reviews the history of the project, and, in light of the recent 3.6 stable release, briefly discusses what has been added since the last stable version (Weka 3.4) released in 2003.
Journal Article

Statistical Comparisons of Classifiers over Multiple Data Sets

TL;DR: A set of simple, yet safe and robust non-parametric tests for statistical comparisons of classifiers is recommended: the Wilcoxon signed ranks test for comparison of two classifiers and the Friedman test with the corresponding post-hoc tests for comparisons of more classifiers over multiple data sets.
Book ChapterDOI

Domain-adversarial training of neural networks

TL;DR: In this article, a new representation learning approach for domain adaptation is proposed, in which data at training and test time come from similar but different distributions, and features that cannot discriminate between the training (source) and test (target) domains are used to promote the emergence of features that are discriminative for the main learning task on the source domain.
Journal ArticleDOI

Experiencing SAX: a novel symbolic representation of time series

TL;DR: The utility of the new symbolic representation of time series formed is demonstrated, which allows dimensionality/numerosity reduction, and it also allows distance measures to be defined on the symbolic approach that lower bound corresponding distance measuresdefined on the original series.
Journal ArticleDOI

Querying and mining of time series data: experimental comparison of representations and distance measures

TL;DR: An extensive set of time series experiments are conducted re-implementing 8 different representation methods and 9 similarity measures and their variants and testing their effectiveness on 38 time series data sets from a wide variety of application domains to provide a unified validation of some of the existing achievements.
Related Papers (5)