scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

The great time series classification bake off: a review and experimental evaluation of recent algorithmic advances

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
This work implemented 18 recently proposed algorithms in a common Java framework and compared them against two standard benchmark classifiers (and each other) by performing 100 resampling experiments on each of the 85 datasets, indicating that only nine of these algorithms are significantly more accurate than both benchmarks.
Abstract
In the last 5 years there have been a large number of new time series classification algorithms proposed in the literature. These algorithms have been evaluated on subsets of the 47 data sets in the University of California, Riverside time series classification archive. The archive has recently been expanded to 85 data sets, over half of which have been donated by researchers at the University of East Anglia. Aspects of previous evaluations have made comparisons between algorithms difficult. For example, several different programming languages have been used, experiments involved a single train/test split and some used normalised data whilst others did not. The relaunch of the archive provides a timely opportunity to thoroughly evaluate algorithms on a larger number of datasets. We have implemented 18 recently proposed algorithms in a common Java framework and compared them against two standard benchmark classifiers (and each other) by performing 100 resampling experiments on each of the 85 datasets. We use these results to test several hypotheses relating to whether the algorithms are significantly more accurate than the benchmarks and each other. Our results indicate that only nine of these algorithms are significantly more accurate than both benchmarks and that one classifier, the collective of transformation ensembles, is significantly more accurate than all of the others. All of our experiments and results are reproducible: we release all of our code, results and experimental details and we hope these experiments form the basis for more robust testing of new algorithms in the future.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Fast data series indexing for in-memory data

TL;DR: MESSI is the first to answer exact similarity search queries on 100GB datasets in 50 ms (30–75 ms across diverse datasets), which enables real-time, interactive data exploration on very large data series collections.
Journal ArticleDOI

Deep Convolutional Clustering-Based Time Series Anomaly Detection.

TL;DR: In this paper, a 1D-convolutional neural network-based deep autoencoder architecture is proposed for anomaly detection in industrial processes. But, the authors only rely on unlabeled data and employ a top-K clustering objective for separating the latent space, selecting the most discriminative features from the latent spaces.
Journal ArticleDOI

Permutation Entropy: Enhancing Discriminating Power by Using Relative Frequencies Vector of Ordinal Patterns Instead of Their Shannon Entropy

TL;DR: This study devised a method of generating synthetic sequences of ordinal patterns using hidden Markov models that was possible to control the histogram distribution and quantify its influence on classification results, and can provide a very valuable guidance for the improvement of the discriminating capability not only of PE, but of many similar histogram-based measures.
Journal ArticleDOI

Self-learning of multivariate time series using perceptually important points

TL;DR: A novel stopping criterion is proposed, which is called Peak evaluation using perceptually important points, to address the problem of knowing when to stop the learning in time-series data.
Posted Content

Biosignal Generation and Latent Variable Analysis with Recurrent Generative Adversarial Networks

TL;DR: In this article, the authors proposed a method for generating time-series data based on GANs and explored their ability to generate biosignals with certain classes and characteristics, where latent variables are analyzed using canonical correlation analysis (CCA) to represent the relationship between input and generated data as canonical loadings.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The WEKA data mining software: an update

TL;DR: This paper provides an introduction to the WEKA workbench, reviews the history of the project, and, in light of the recent 3.6 stable release, briefly discusses what has been added since the last stable version (Weka 3.4) released in 2003.
Journal Article

Statistical Comparisons of Classifiers over Multiple Data Sets

TL;DR: A set of simple, yet safe and robust non-parametric tests for statistical comparisons of classifiers is recommended: the Wilcoxon signed ranks test for comparison of two classifiers and the Friedman test with the corresponding post-hoc tests for comparisons of more classifiers over multiple data sets.
Book ChapterDOI

Domain-adversarial training of neural networks

TL;DR: In this article, a new representation learning approach for domain adaptation is proposed, in which data at training and test time come from similar but different distributions, and features that cannot discriminate between the training (source) and test (target) domains are used to promote the emergence of features that are discriminative for the main learning task on the source domain.
Journal ArticleDOI

Experiencing SAX: a novel symbolic representation of time series

TL;DR: The utility of the new symbolic representation of time series formed is demonstrated, which allows dimensionality/numerosity reduction, and it also allows distance measures to be defined on the symbolic approach that lower bound corresponding distance measuresdefined on the original series.
Journal ArticleDOI

Querying and mining of time series data: experimental comparison of representations and distance measures

TL;DR: An extensive set of time series experiments are conducted re-implementing 8 different representation methods and 9 similarity measures and their variants and testing their effectiveness on 38 time series data sets from a wide variety of application domains to provide a unified validation of some of the existing achievements.
Related Papers (5)