scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

The interaction of material and ideational factors in the East China Sea dispute: impact on future dispute management

James Manicom
- 08 Dec 2008 - 
- Vol. 20, Iss: 3, pp 375-391
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this article, the authors argue that previous analyses privilege one aspect of the dispute over the other, arguing that the primary motivations relate to the material wealth of the seabed combined with increased energy needs in China and Japan.
Abstract
This article seeks to explain the current phase of the East China Sea dispute between China and Japan. It argues that previous analyses privilege one aspect of the dispute over the other. Some stress the nationalist dimension of the dispute while others argue the primary motivations relate to the material wealth of the seabed combined with increased energy needs in China and Japan. By analysing the interaction between the nationalist (ideational) and resource (material) dimensions, it becomes clear why it has become increasingly difficult for policy elites in either state to seek compromise. This is because nationalist constituencies in China and Japan have extended their nationalist/ideational sentiment from the Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands to the entire East China Sea. Simultaneously, Beijing and Tokyo's interest in the material exploitation and security of the East China Sea has risen. This convergence between nationalist and elite interest became clear in April 2005 and significantly raised bilateral tensio...

read more

Citations
More filters
Posted Content

Maritime Territorial Disputes in East Asia: A Comparative Analysis of the South China Sea and the East China Sea

TL;DR: In this article, the bargaining model of war and hegemonic stability theory were used to track the record of conflicts and shifts in the relative power balances of the claimants, leading to the conclusion that certainty and stability have improved in the South China Sea, with the converse happening in the East China Sea.
Journal ArticleDOI

Ocean governance, maritime security and the consequences of modernity in Northeast Asia

Christian Wirth
- 18 Apr 2012 - 
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors look at how the maritime sphere of Northeast Asia is represented in common political and academic discourses of international relations and find that maritime affairs are firmly cast in the language of national security, and that empirical evidence against perceived threats and related security imperatives is often neglected if not completely ignored.
Journal ArticleDOI

Maritime Territorial Disputes in East Asia: A Comparative Analysis of the South China Sea and the East China Sea

TL;DR: In this article, the bargaining model of war and hegemonic stability theory were used to track the record of conflicts and shifts in the relative power balances of the claimants, leading to the conclusion that certainty and stability have improved in the South China Sea, with the converse happening in the East China Sea.
Journal ArticleDOI

Identity Politics and the Russia-Canada Continental Shelf Dispute: An Impediment to Cooperation?

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors argue that leaders in both Canada and Russia seem willing to emphasise the ideational saliency of disputed space to domestic audiences while downplaying their cooperative track record.
Journal ArticleDOI

Identity, contact, and the reduction of mutual distrust: a survey of Chinese and Japanese youth

TL;DR: The authors examined the evidence related to the three approaches (face-to-face contact, cross-cultural exposure, and social identity) to reduce mutual distrust and antipathy in the two countries.
References
More filters
Book

China's Ocean Frontier: International Law, Military Force and National Development

Greg Austin
TL;DR: In this paper, Li et al. presented the People's Republic of China's strategic vision of its Ocean Frontier and the costs and benefits in military defence of China Ocean Frontier. But they did not specify the number of troops involved.
Journal ArticleDOI

CHINA'S HISTORY ACTIVISTS AND THE WAR OF RESISTANCE AGAINST JAPAN: History in the Making

James Reilly
- 01 Mar 2004 - 
TL;DR: In China over the past two decades, a group of history activists have maximized their professional independence, social credibility, academic resources, and international connections to usurp many traditional roles of the state in building new institutions and engaging in activism aimed at documenting and disseminating information on Japan9s wartime atrocities as discussed by the authors.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Sino-Japanese Treaty of 1978: The Senkaku Incident Prelude

Daniel Tretiak
- 01 Dec 1978 - 
TL;DR: In this paper, a Treaty of Peace and Friendship was signed in Peking, and two and a half months after the Senkaku incident simmered down, Sino-Japanese negotiations commenced again; and on August 12, a treaty of peace and friendship was signed.
Journal ArticleDOI

The sources and limits of Sino-Japanese tensions

TL;DR: This article argued that the history issue, deep societal antipathy and substantial strategic divergences keep the political relationship from progressing the way the bilateral economic relationship has grown, and that Japan is not likely to re-emerge as a great power or discontinue its alliance with the United States, despite the steady expansion of the Japan Self-Defense Forces.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Management of Nationalism during the Jiang Era (1994–2002) and Its Implications On Government and Regime Legitimacy

TL;DR: The authors provided a detailed explanation of how the promotion of different nationalist discourses in China entails distinct repercussions on both government and regime legitimacy, looking for the rationale of governmental appeal to both affirmative and assertive nationalism within the context of general legitimacy crisis suffered by communism in the last years.