scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

The rise of competitive authoritarianism

Steven Levitsky, +1 more
- 01 Apr 2002 - 
- Vol. 13, Iss: 2, pp 51-65
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The post-Cold War world has been marked by the proliferation of hybrid political regimes as discussed by the authors, and scholars often treated these regimes as incomplete or transitional forms of democracy, yet in many cases these expectations (or hopes) proved overly optimistic.
Abstract
The post–Cold War world has been marked by the proliferation of hybrid political regimes. In different ways, and to varying degrees, polities across much of Africa (Ghana, Kenya, Mozambique, Zambia, Zimbabwe), postcommunist Eurasia (Albania, Croatia, Russia, Serbia, Ukraine), Asia (Malaysia, Taiwan), and Latin America (Haiti, Mexico, Paraguay, Peru) combined democratic rules with authoritarian governance during the 1990s. Scholars often treated these regimes as incomplete or transitional forms of democracy. Yet in many cases these expectations (or hopes) proved overly optimistic. Particularly in Africa and the former Soviet Union, many regimes have either remained hybrid or moved in an authoritarian direction. It may therefore be time to stop thinking of these cases in terms of transitions to democracy and to begin thinking about the specific types of regimes they actually are. In recent years, many scholars have pointed to the importance of hybrid regimes. Indeed, recent academic writings have produced a variety of labels for mixed cases, including not only “hybrid regime” but also “semidemocracy,” “virtual democracy,” “electoral democracy,” “pseudodemocracy,” “illiberal democracy,” “semi-authoritarianism,” “soft authoritarianism,” “electoral authoritarianism,” and Freedom House’s “Partly Free.” 1 Yet much of this literature suffers from two important weaknesses. First, many studies are characterized by a democratizing bias. Analyses frequently treat mixed regimes as partial or “diminished” forms of democracy, 2 or as undergoing prolonged transiSteven Levitsky is assistant professor of government and social studies at Harvard University. His Transforming Labor-Based Parties in Latin America is forthcoming from Cambridge University Press. Lucan A. Way is assistant professor of political science at Temple University and an academy scholar at the Academy for International and Area Studies at Harvard University. He is currently writing a book on the obstacles to authoritarian consolidation in the former Soviet Union.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Informal institutions and comparative politics: a research agenda

TL;DR: Levitsky et al. as mentioned in this paper developed a framework for studying informal institutions and integrating them into comparative institutional analysis, based on a typology of four patterns of formal-informal institutional interaction: complementary, accommodating, competing, and substitutive.
Journal ArticleDOI

Democracy and dictatorship revisited

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors address the strengths and weaknesses of the main available measures of political regime and extend the dichotomous regime classification first introduced in Alvarez et al. (Stud. Comp. Int. Dev. 31(2):3-36, 1996).
Book

Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and its Demise in Mexico

TL;DR: The politics of vote-buying and the game of electoral transitions are discussed in this article, where the authors focus on the structural determinants of mass support and the electoral fraud.
Book

Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited

TL;DR: In this article, Pippa Norris examines the symptoms by comparing system support in more than fifty societies worldwide, challenging the pervasive claim that most established democracies have experienced a steadily rising tide of political disaffection during the third-wave era.
Journal ArticleDOI

Authoritarian Institutions and the Survival of Autocrats

TL;DR: The authors argue that when authoritarian rulers need to solicit the cooperation of outsiders or deter the threat, they will fall quickly after taking power, which is why some autocrats survive for decades, and others fall soon after taking office.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The end of the transition paradigm

TL;DR: In the last quarter of the twentieth century, trends in seven different regions converged to change the political landscape of the world: 1) the fall of right-wing authoritarian regimes in Southern Europe in the mid 1970s; 2) the replacement of military dictatorships by elected civilian governments across Latin America from the late 1970s through the late 1980s; 3) the decline of authoritarian rule in parts of East and South Asia starting in mid-1980s; 4) the collapse of communist regimes in Eastern Europe at the end of the 1980s, 5) the breakup of the Soviet
Book

Developing Democracy: Toward Consolidation

Larry Diamond
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors argue that the third wave of global democratization has come to an end, leaving a growing gap between the electoral form and the liberal substance of democracy.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Rise of Illiberal Democracy

Fareed Zakaria
- 01 Nov 1997 - 
TL;DR: Holbrooke as mentioned in this paper argued that if the election was declared free and fair, and those elected are "racists, fascists, separatists, who are publicly opposed to [peace and r?int?gration], that is the dilemma." Indeed it is, not just in the former Yugoslavia, but increasingly around the world.
Book

Democratic Experiments in Africa: Regime Transitions in Comparative Perspective

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors developed a political-institutional theoretical framework in which the distinctive political traditions of Africa's neopatrimonial states are shown to have powerfully shaped the regime transitions, and demonstrated that economic and international forces often provided the context in which political liberalization occurred, but cannot by themselves explain the observed outcomes.
Posted Content

Democracy with Adjectives: Conceptual Innovation in Comparative Research

TL;DR: The authors explored the strengths and weaknesses of alternative strategies of conceptual innovation that have emerged: descending and climbing Sartori's ladder of generality, generating diminished" subtypes of democracy, precising the definition of democracy by adding defining attributes, and shifting the overarching concept with which democracy is associated.