The role of trust management in distributed systems security

TLDR: The concept of trust management is introduced, its basic principles are explained, and some existing trust-management engines are described, including PoHcyMaker and KeyNote, which allow for increased flexibility and expressibility, as well as standardization of modern, scalable security mechanisms.

Abstract: Existing authorization mechanisms fail to provide powerful and robust tools for handling security at the scale necessary for today's Internet. These mechanisms are coming under increasing strain from the development and deployment of systems that increase the programmability of the Internet. Moreover, this "increased flexibility through programmability" trend seems to be accelerating with the advent of proposals such as Active Networking and Mobile Agents. The trust-management approach to distributed-system security was developed as an answer to the inadequacy of traditional authorization mechanisms. Trust-management engines avoid the need to resolve "identities" in an authorization decision. Instead, they express privileges and restrictions in a programming language. This allows for increased flexibility and expressibility, as well as standardization of modern, scalable security mechanisms. Further advantages of the trust-management approach include proofs that requested transactions comply with local policies and system architectures that encourage developers and administrators to consider an application's security policy carefully and specify it explicitly. In this paper, we examine existing authorization mechanisms and their inadequacies. We introduce the concept of trust management, explain its basic principles, and describe some existing trust-management engines, including PoHcyMaker and KeyNote. We also report on our experience using trust-management engines in several distributed-system applications.