scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Variation of beam characteristics between three different wedges from a dual-energy accelerator.

TLDR
The purpose of this study was to compare the dosimetric characteristics of a physical and enhanced dynamic wedge from a dual-energy (6 and 18 MV) linear accelerator such as surfaces doses with different source to surface distances (SSD), half value layer (HVL) in water and peripheral doses for both available energies.
Abstract
The use of megavoltage X-ray sources of radiation, with their skin-sparing qualities in radiation therapy, has been proved useful in relieving patient discomfort and allowing higher tumor doses to be given with fewer restrictions due to radiation effects in the skin. The purpose of this study was to compare the dosimetric characteristics of a physical and enhanced dynamic wedge from a dual-energy (6 and 18 MV) linear accelerator such as surfaces doses with different source to surface distances (SSD), half value layer (HVL) in water and peripheral doses for both available energies. At short SSD such as 85 cm, higher surface doses are produced by the lower wedges by the short wedge-to-skin distance. For physical wedged field, at heel edge side HVL value was high (17 cm) compared with the measured that of EDW (15.1 cm). It was noticed that, the HVL variation across the beam was significantly higher for 6 MV X-rays than for 18 MV X-rays. The lower wedge has the maximum variation of peripheral dose compared to other wedges. The three wedge systems discussed in this work possess vastly different dosimetric characteristics. These differences will have a direct impact on the choice of the wedge system to be used for a particular treatment. Complete knowledge of the dosimetric characterisitics, including the surface and peripheral doses, is crucial in proper choice of particular wedge systems in clinical use.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal Article

Monte Carlo study on beam hardening effect of physical wedges

TL;DR: It is recommended that beam hardening and soŌ ening of physical wedges should be considered in treatment planning systems in order to increase the accuracy in dose delivery.
Journal ArticleDOI

Poster - Thur Eve - 60: Physical and dynamic wedges in radiotherapy for rectal cancer: A dosimetric comparison.

TL;DR: It is concluded that the EDW at 45° results in an improvement to the plan evaluation parameters presented and thus increases dose efficacy for radiotherapy of rectal cancer.
Journal ArticleDOI

Dosimetric verification of the Elekta motorized wedge

TL;DR: The linear interpolation method was proved to calculate wedge angle for any output factor and depth and the effect of the field size on the wedge angle and wedge factor was investigated for motorized wedge.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Computer controlled Dynamic wedge collimator for cancer treatment machine

TL;DR: The controlling of beam shaping device namely secondary collimator, which creates varying field intensity while the radiation beam is on, is discussed, which leads toward the conformal treatment and there by sparing good tissue, this increases quality of treatment.
Related Papers (5)