scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

What is the optimal chair stand test protocol for older adults? A systematic review.

TLDR
A feasible and safe protocol for the chair stand test is proposed for assessment of older adults and may provide a measure to identify frail individuals and to determine their level of frailty.
Abstract
Purpose: To determine the chair stand test protocol that is most suitable for older adults in clinical settings by reviewing the currently available methods.Methods: Five electronic English databases were searched and details of methods used on individuals aged ≥65 years in the included studies were compared, including the instrument used to record time, units of measurement, chair characteristics (seat height, armrests), footwear, permission to use upper extremities and walking aids, pace of performance, total number of chair stands, timing points, total number of recorded and practice tests.Results: A total of 23 eligible studies were identified. The type of instrument to record performance time, characteristics of the chair and footwear were not frequently mentioned. A majority of studies did not permit the use of the upper extremities or walking aids during assessment. The performance of five chair stands at a fast pace recorded in seconds was most common, with the majority of studies recording the initial and end time point in a seated position. The total number of performed tests and practice tests was not specified in a majority of studies.Conclusion: A feasible and safe protocol for the chair stand test is proposed for assessment of older adults.Implications for RehabilitationThe chair stand test may provide valuable information on declines in mobility in older adults.The use of the chair stand test within clinical settings of older adults may provide a measure to identify frail individuals and to determine their level of frailty.Using the proposed protocol for the chair stand test may allow for the comparability of results.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Reliability, measurement error and minimum detectable change in mobility measures: a cohort study of community-dwelling adults aged 50 years and over in Ireland.

TL;DR: Average performance did not vary between baseline and repeat assessments in any test, except RCS, and the rater significantly affected performance on all tests except one, but time of day did not.
Journal ArticleDOI

Measures of Physical Performance.

TL;DR: This review covers clinical physical performance measures that relate to adults with rheumatic conditions, specifically lower extremity osteoarthritis (OA), and removes several measures that were included in the 2011 review because there were no new studies evaluating these tests since the last review in 2011.
Journal ArticleDOI

Association between fall history and performance-based physical function and postural sway in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

TL;DR: Numerical evaluation of the chair stand test and postural sway in the semitandem position seems more appropriate than SPPB for assessing the fall risk of patients with RA.
Journal ArticleDOI

Behavior of the muscle quality index and isometric strength in elderly women.

TL;DR: The muscle quality index (MQI) is a clinical and practical tool to assess the muscular power of the lower extremities and the relationship of the MQI with the sit-to-stand test (STS) and isometric hip strength in younger and older women was determined.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement

TL;DR: A reporting guideline is described, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses for Protocols 2015 (PRISMA-P 2015), which consists of a 17-item checklist intended to facilitate the preparation and reporting of a robust protocol for the systematic review.
Journal ArticleDOI

A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission.

TL;DR: Evidence is presented that performance measures can validly characterize older persons across a broad spectrum of lower extremity function and that performance and self-report measures may complement each other in providing useful information about functional status.
Journal ArticleDOI

Lower-Extremity Function in Persons over the Age of 70 Years as a Predictor of Subsequent Disability

TL;DR: Among nondisabled older persons living in the community, objective measures of lower-extremity function were highly predictive of subsequent disability.
Journal ArticleDOI

A 30-s chair-stand test as a measure of lower body strength in community-residing older adults

TL;DR: It was concluded that the 30-s chair stand provides a reasonably reliable and valid indicator of lower body strength in generally active, community-dwelling older adults.
Related Papers (5)
Trending Questions (2)
Is the 5 repetition chair rise test associated with self-reported fatigue in older adults?

The association between the 5 repetition chair rise test and self-reported fatigue in older adults is not mentioned in the provided information.

Why chair stand tests relevant to walking and stair climbing?

The chair stand test is relevant to walking and stair climbing as it provides valuable information on declines in mobility in older adults.