Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
Efforts to increase women’s participation in computer science, engineering, and physics may benefit from changing masculine cultures and providing students with early experiences that signal equally to both girls and boys that they belong and can succeed in these fields.Abstract:
Women obtain more than half of U.S. undergraduate degrees in biology, chemistry, and mathematics, yet they earn less than 20% of computer science, engineering, and physics undergraduate degrees (National Science Foundation, 2014a). Gender differences in interest in computer science, engineering, and physics appear even before college. Why are women represented in some science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields more than others? We conduct a critical review of the most commonly cited factors explaining gender disparities in STEM participation and investigate whether these factors explain differential gender participation across STEM fields. Math performance and discrimination influence who enters STEM, but there is little evidence to date that these factors explain why women's underrepresentation is relatively worse in some STEM fields. We introduce a model with three overarching factors to explain the larger gender gaps in participation in computer science, engineering, and physics than in biology, chemistry, and mathematics: (a) masculine cultures that signal a lower sense of belonging to women than men, (b) a lack of sufficient early experience with computer science, engineering, and physics, and (c) gender gaps in self-efficacy. Efforts to increase women's participation in computer science, engineering, and physics may benefit from changing masculine cultures and providing students with early experiences that signal equally to both girls and boys that they belong and can succeed in these fields. (PsycINFO Database Recordread more
Citations
More filters
Posted Content
Prologue to The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies
TL;DR: The Difference as discussed by the authors is a landmark book about how we think in groups and how our collective wisdom exceeds the sum of its parts, and how groups that display a range of perspectives outperform groups of like-minded experts.
Journal ArticleDOI
The Gender-Equality Paradox in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education.
Gijsbert Stoet,David C. Geary +1 more
TL;DR: It was shown that girls performed similarly to or better than boys in science in two of every three countries, and in nearly all countries, more girls appeared capable of college-level STEM study than had enrolled and these sex differences in academic strengths and attitudes toward science correlated with the STEM graduation gap.
Journal Article
Women and men.
TL;DR: The data shows clearly the need for EEO initiatives for women within the health service and identifies the areas of greatest concern.
Why So Slow The Advancement Of Women
TL;DR: The why so slow the advancement of women is universally compatible with any devices to read and is available in the book collection an online access to it is set as public so you can get it instantly.
Journal ArticleDOI
Programming experience promotes higher STEM motivation among first-grade girls.
TL;DR: 6-year-old children's views mirror current American cultural messages about who excels at computer science and engineering and show the benefit of providing young girls with chances to experience technological activities.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.
TL;DR: In this paper, it was shown that people are sometimes unaware of the existence of a stimulus that influenced a response, unaware of its existence, and unaware that the stimulus has affected the response.
Journal ArticleDOI
Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans
Claude M. Steele,Joshua Aronson +1 more
TL;DR: The role of stereotype vulnerability in the standardized test performance of ability-stigmatized groups is discussed and mere salience of the stereotype could impair Blacks' performance even when the test was not ability diagnostic.
Journal ArticleDOI
Toward a Unifying Social Cognitive Theory of Career and Academic Interest, Choice, and Performance
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a social cognitive framework for understanding three intricately linked aspects of career development: (a) the formation and elaboration of career-relevant interests, (b) selection of academic and career choice options, and (c) performance and persistence in educational and occupational pursuits.
Journal ArticleDOI
Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders.
Alice H. Eagly,Steven J. Karau +1 more
TL;DR: Evidence from varied research paradigms substantiates that consequences of perceived incongruity between the female gender role and leadership roles are more difficult for women to become leaders and to achieve success in leadership roles.
Journal ArticleDOI
False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant
TL;DR: It is shown that despite empirical psychologists’ nominal endorsement of a low rate of false-positive findings, flexibility in data collection, analysis, and reporting dramatically increases actual false- positive rates, and a simple, low-cost, and straightforwardly effective disclosure-based solution is suggested.