Q2. How much would be needed to compensate for increasing the level of noise nuisance?
As an average value, about €400 per year - depending on distance to airport, noise nuisance level, family income, and dwelling insulation - would be needed to compensate individuals for increasing the level of noise nuisance.
Q3. How does he calculate the total willingness to pay?
He applies the life satisfaction approach supplemented by hedonic house- price regression techniques to calculate total willingness-to-pay.
Q4. How do the authors deal with the problem of unobserved individual heterogeneity?
Since their data are repeated cross-sections, the authors cannot control for unobserved individual heterogeneity through panel data estimation.
Q5. What is the main contribution of this paper?
The major contribution of their paper is that the authors combine two strands of research: theone that considers the association between environmental quality, climate, and SWBmeasures, and the literature relating employee perceptions of the work environment to well-being and life satisfaction.
Q6. How do they conclude that indoor environmental conditions can be controlled by employees?
In their survey of buildings and the environment, Frontczak and Wargocki (2011) conclude that, when indoor environmental conditions can be controlled by employees, satisfaction improves.
Q7. What is the relationship between employee perceptions of environmental conditions and job performance?
Regarding indoor environmental conditions, McCaughey et al. (2014) find that employee perceptions of workplace environmental conditions are related to individuallevel outcomes, such as well-being and job performance.