Showing papers on "Conditioning published in 2003"
TL;DR: The findings suggest that the larger the cognitive demands on the system, the less likely conditioning occurs and differential delay conditioning proved to be more resilient than differential trace conditioning but does show a reduction due to task interference similar to that found in trace conditioning.
Abstract: Previous studies of associative learning implicate higher-level cognitive processes in some forms of classical conditioning. An ongoing debate is concerned with the extent to which attention and awareness are necessary for trace but not delay eye-blink conditioning [Clark, R. E. & Squire, L. R. (1998) Science 280, 77-81; Lovibond, P. F. & Shanks, D. (2002) J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Processes 28, 38-42]. In trace conditioning, a short interval is interposed between the termination of the conditioned stimulus (CS) and the onset of the unconditioned stimulus (US). In delay conditioning, the CS and US overlap. We here investigate the extent to which human classical fear conditioning depends on working memory. Subjects had to carry out an n-back task, requiring tracking an item 1 or 2 back in a sequentially presented list of numbers, while simultaneously being tested for their ability to associate auditory cues with shocks under a variety of conditions (single-cue versus differential; delay versus trace; no task versus 0-, 1-, and 2-back). Differential delay conditioning proved to be more resilient than differential trace conditioning but does show a reduction due to task interference similar in slope to that found in trace conditioning. Explicit knowledge of the stimulus contingency facilitates but does not guarantee trace conditioning. Only the single-cue delay protocol shows conditioning during the more difficult working memory task. Our findings suggest that the larger the cognitive demands on the system, the less likely conditioning occurs. A postexperimental questionnaire showed a positive correlation between conditioning and awareness for differential trace conditioning extinction.
128 citations
TL;DR: The impairment by alcohol of learning to a tone CS when it is hippocampus‐dependent, but not when it are hippocampus‐independent provides further support for the hypothesis that alcohol exerts a selective effect on hippocampus‐ dependent learning.
Abstract: It has been hypothesized that the amnesic effects of alcohol are through selective disruption of hippocampal function. Delay and trace fear conditioning are useful paradigms to investigate hippocampal-dependent and independent forms of memory. With delay fear conditioning, learning of explicit cues does not depend on normal hippocampal function, whereas learning explicit cues in trace fear conditioning does. In both delay and trace fear conditioning, the hippocampus is involved in learning to contextual cues, but it may not be entirely necessary. The present study investigates the effects of alcohol on the acquisition of delay and trace fear conditioning in mice, using freezing as a measure of learning. Male C57BL/6J mice were injected with 0.8 or 1.6 g/kg of 20% v/v alcohol and were immediately exposed to eight tone-footshock pairings in which the conditional stimulus (CS) either coterminated with a footshock unconditional stimulus (US) (delay conditioning) or was separated from the footshock by a 30-s trace interval (trace conditioning). During trace, but not delay fear conditioning, 0.8 g/kg alcohol impaired learning to a tone CS. This dose also impaired context-dependent learning in both procedures (although only slightly for trace fear conditioning). The 1.6 g/kg alcohol exerted a nonselective impairment on learning. The impairment by alcohol of learning to a tone CS when it is hippocampus-dependent, but not when it is hippocampus-independent provides further support for the hypothesis that alcohol exerts a selective effect on hippocampus-dependent learning.
72 citations
TL;DR: The female mosquitoes reared in repellent‐treated water were conditioned against oviposition site deterrence, as shown when choice tests were conducted 6 days post‐emergence from the treated water, demonstrating learning and memory in the mosquito Ae.
Abstract: Oviposition site choice by female mosquitoes, Aedes aegypti (L) (Diptera: Culicidae), was affected by rearing them in water treated with 0.016% of the repellent Mozaway trade mark containing citronella and neem. Given a choice between a bowl of repellent-treated and a bowl of untreated water, Ae. aegypti reared in untreated water strongly preferred to oviposit on the clean water (93-98%) instead of repellent-treated water. This demonstrates effective deterrence of oviposition by dilute Mozaway trade mark. Those reared in repellent-treated water were less deterred: 38-46% of their eggs were laid on the repellent-treated water and 54-62% on the clean water. Evidently the female mosquitoes reared in repellent-treated water were conditioned against oviposition site deterrence, as shown when choice tests were conducted 6 days post-emergence from the treated water. This demonstrates learning and memory in the mosquito Ae. aegypti, with implications for dengue vector surveillance and control.
66 citations
TL;DR: Four experiments with rats examined partial reinforcement in appetitive conditioning and the results underscore the importance of temporal variables in conditioning but are more consistent with trial-based accounts than time-accumulation accounts of conditioning.
Abstract: Four experiments with rats examined partial reinforcement in appetitive conditioning. In Experiment 1, adding nonreinforced trials to a continuous reinforcement schedule slowed acquisition, whereas deleting reinforcers did not. Trial massing suppressed performance and learning. In Experiment 2, conditioning with a short conditioned stimulus (CS) was rapid, and partial reinforcement with a short CS was as effective as continuous reinforcement with equal accumulated time in the CS. In Experiment 3, conditioning was nevertheless influenced by the probability of reinforcement. In Experiments 3 and 4, conditioning was especially disrupted when nonreinforced trials preceded reinforced trials closely in time. The results underscore the importance of temporal variables in conditioning but are more consistent with trial-based accounts than time-accumulation accounts of conditioning.
56 citations
TL;DR: The results did not simply arise because amphetamine increased conditioning under any condition in which conditioning without amphetamine was poor, and the effect on conditioning to trace conditioned stimuli depended on the level of reinforcer but increased conditioning to background did not.
Abstract: Amphetamine can increase conditioning to poor predictors of reinforcement in selective learning tasks (e.g. latent inhibition, LI). In the present study, a noise stimulus was contiguous with footshock or presented at a trace interval. A flashing light background stimulus was used to measure contextual conditioning. Experiment 1 used 1.5 mg/kg and 6 mg/kg dl-amphetamine. Experiments 2 and 3 used 0.5 mg/kg and 1.5 mg/kg d-amphetamine. Unconditioned stimuli parameters (intensity, number, duration) were also manipulated from one experiment to the next. Amphetamine consistently increased conditioning to the background stimulus, and increased conditioning to the trace stimulus at higher footshock intensity (Experiment 3). Thus, amphetamine increased conditioning only to relatively uninformative predictors. The effect on conditioning to trace conditioned stimuli depended on the level of reinforcer but increased conditioning to background did not. Throughout, there was no effect of amphetamine on conditioning of the contiguous stimulus. Thus, the results did not simply arise because amphetamine increased conditioning under any condition in which conditioning without amphetamine was poor. The results are discussed in terms of amphetamine effects on breadth of attention and LI to context.
35 citations
20 citations
12 Jun 2003
TL;DR: In this article, the authors defined conditional states as convex combination of special states and defined conditional probability as the sum of the conditional probability and the probability of a special state. But they did not deal with the problem of conditioning for such random events, which are not simultaneously measurable.
Abstract: The definition of the conditional probability is very important in the theory of the probability This definition is based on the fact, that random events can be simultaneously measurable This paper deal with the problem of conditioning for such random events, which are not simultaneously measurable This paper defines conditional states as convex combination of special states
18 citations