scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers on "Institutional research published in 1974"



Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a presentation given by the authors to the Society for Long Range Planning and reprinted from the NRDC Bulletin is described, which illustrates the philosophy and approach adopted in planning for innovation in an organization whose work is of a longerterm nature than most companies.

99 citations











01 Jan 1974
TL;DR: In this paper, a model of institutional development is presented and applied to the case studies of Title /XI institutions, followed by a summary for each of the three grant categories, after which some concluding comments are made.
Abstract: This document summarizes programs provided in the Developing Institutions Program (Title III of the 1965 Higher Education Act.) The data sources were a questionnaire yielding Title III program data and institutional characteristics from 1965-66 to 1970-71 for 325 institutions receiving Title III funds, as well as cane studies for 41 institutions and four agencies detailing their use of Title III funds conducted during 1972. In this review a model of institutional development is presented and applied to the case studies of Title /XI institutions. Then a general summary of Title III programs from questionnaire data is given followed by a summary for each of the three grant categories, after which some concluding comments are made. (Author)


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examine five emerging directions in higher education, how they relate to enrollment, and their implications for institutional research, and examine one set of responses, that of institutional research.
Abstract: This article focuses on some potential future trends in postsecondary education and their implications for institutional planners and researchers. The four projections are: increased enrollment of the nontraditional student, rise of alternative educational institutions, decreased undergraduate vocational preparation and certification accompanied by increased short-term preparation in skills, and diminution of compulsory education. It is becoming increasingly clear that the survival of large portions of higher education is dependent upon our ability to anticipate and deal with the future. Recently, much has been written about collegiate enrollment and its inevitable decline in the 1980s. This paper will examine five emerging directions in higher education, how they relate to enrollment, and their implications for institutional research. Our understanding of enrollment must be a dynamic process; it must take into account potential futures and suggest institutional responses to them. This paper attempts to examine one set of responses, that of institutional research.






01 Jan 1974
TL;DR: Bodgkinson and Schenkel as discussed by the authors presented a study of Title III of the Nigher Education Act: The Developing Institutions Program: The Final Deportation.
Abstract: AOTNOR Bodgkinson, Harold L.; Schenkel, 'alter TITLE A Study of Title III of the Nigher Education Act: The Developing Institutions Program. Final Deport. INSTITOTION California Univ., Berkeley. Center for Research and Development in Higher Education. MIPS AGENCY Office of Education (DIM, Washington, D.C. Office of Planning, Budgeting, and Evaluation. POE DATE Jan 74 CONTRACT OEC-0-70-4927 NOTE 582p.

Journal Article
TL;DR: In an attempt to determine the relative importance of institutional vs. situational perspectives in influencing faculty perceptions of the academic environment, Institutional Functioning Inventory responses were obtained from representative samples of faculty, students and administrators at a diverse cross-section of American colleges.
Abstract: In an attempt to determine the relative importance of institutional vs. situational perspectives in influencing faculty perceptions of the academic environment, Institutional Functioning Inventory responses were obtained from representative samples of faculty, students and administrators at a diverse cross-section of American colleges. Though administrators tended to have more favorable views than those of the students or faculty members, the evidence strongly suggests the presence of one generally-perceived environment, rather than a series of sub-environments dependent upon group membership. Furthermore, faculty views seemed to be relatively independent of various faculty situational variables, such as academic rank, teaching load, and academic field.