Showing papers on "Osseointegration published in 1999"

Characteristics of bone ingrowth and interface mechanics of a new porous tantalum biomaterial

Abstract: We have studied the characteristics of bone ingrowth of a new porous tantalum biomaterial in a simple transcortical canine model using cylindrical implants 5 x 10 mm in size. The material was 75% to 80% porous by volume and had a repeating arrangement of slender interconnecting struts which formed a regular array of dodecahedron-shaped pores. We performed histological studies on two types of material, one with a smaller pore size averaging 430 microm at 4, 16 and 52 weeks and the other with a larger pore size averaging 650 microm at 2, 3, 4, 16 and 52 weeks. Mechanical push-out tests at 4 and 16 weeks were used to assess the shear strength of the bone-implant interface on implants of the smaller pore size. The extent of filling of the pores of the tantalum material with new bone increased from 13% at two weeks to between 42% and 53% at four weeks. By 16 and 52 weeks the average extent of bone ingrowth ranged from 63% to 80%. The tissue response to the small and large pore sizes was similar, with regions of contact between bone and implant increasing with time and with evidence of Haversian remodelling within the pores at later periods. Mechanical tests at four weeks indicated a minimum shear fixation strength of 18.5 MPa, substantially higher than has been obtained with other porous materials with less volumetric porosity. This porous tantalum biomaterial has desirable characteristics for bone ingrowth; further studies are warranted to ascertain its potential for clinical reconstructive orthopaedics.

Clinical complications of osseointegrated implants

Abstract: Statement of problem. There is no comprehensive review of the literature that identifies the complications reported in clinical dental implant studies. Purpose. This article attempted to determine the types of complications that have been reported and to provide data regarding their frequency. Methods. All available clinical studies from 1981 to 1997, published in English or with English abstract, that presented success/failure data regarding implant treatment were evaluated to determine the types of reported complications and to quantify implant loss as it relates to type of prosthesis, arch, time, implant length, and bone quality. Results. Greater implant loss occurred with overdentures than with other types of prostheses. There was greater loss in the maxilla than mandible with fixed complete dentures and overdentures, whereas little arch difference was noted with fixed partial dentures. Implant loss increased with short implants and poor bone quality. The time of implant loss (preprosthetic vs postprosthetic) varied with type of prosthesis. Surgical complications included neurosensory disturbance, hematoma, mandibular fracture, hemorrhage, and tooth devitalization. Initial and long-term marginal bone changes were identified. Peri-implant soft tissue complications included dehiscence, fistulas, and gingival inflammation/proliferation. Mechanical complications were screw loosening/fracture, implant fractures, framework, resin base and veneering material fractures, opposing prosthesis fractures, and overdenture mechanical retention problems. Some studies also presented phonetic and esthetic complications. Conclusions. Although the literature presents considerable information on implant complications, variations in study design and reporting procedures limited the available data and therefore precluded proper analysis of certain complications. (J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:537-52.)

Survival of the Brånemark implant in partially edentulous jaws: a 10-year prospective multicenter study.

Abstract: A total of 127 partially edentulous patients, treated according to the Branemark protocol, was followed for 10 years after completion of prosthetic treatment. The patients ranged in age from 18 to 70 years, and 57% were female. Four hundred sixty-one implants were placed in 56 maxillae and 71 mandibles. In 125 patients, 163 fixed partial prostheses were attached to the implants; a majority of the prostheses (83%) were located in posterior regions. At the end of the 10-year period, 73% of the implants could be traced either as failed or in function, providing cumulative implant survival rates of 90.2% and 93.7% for the maxilla and mandible, respectively. Of the original fixed prostheses, 63% (cumulatively 86.5%) were still in use, whereas the level of continuous cumulative prosthesis function, including primary and remade restorations, was 94.3% at the end of the evaluation period. Marginal bone resorption at the implants was low (mean = 0.7 mm), and mucosal health was good. No severe complications apart from the above-mentioned implant and prosthetic failures were reported. The Branemark Implant System is a safe and predictable method for restoring partially edentulous patients, as demonstrated by this 10-year follow-up investigation.

In vivo bone response to biomechanical loading at the bone/dental-implant interface.

Abstract: Since dental implants must withstand relatively large forces and moments in function, a better understanding of in vivo bone response to loading would aid implant design. The following topics are essential in this problem. (1) Theoretical models and experimental data are available for understanding implant loading as an aid to case planning. (2) At least for several months after surgery, bone healing in gaps between implant and bone as well as in pre-existing damaged bone will determine interface structure and properties. The ongoing healing creates a complicated environment. (3) Recent studies reveal that an interfacial cement line exists between the implant surface and bone for titanium and hydroxyapatite (HA). Since cement lines in normal bone have been identified as weak interfaces, a cement line at a bone-biomaterial interface may also be a weak point. Indeed, data on interfacial shear and tensile "bond" strengths are consistent with this idea. (4) Excessive interfacial micromotion early after implantation interferes with local bone healing and predisposes to a fibrous tissue interface instead of osseointegration. (5) Large strains can damage bone. For implants that have healed in situ for several months before being loaded, data support the hypothesis that interfacial overload occurs if the strains are excessive in interfacial bone. While bone "adaptation" to loading is a long-standing concept in bone physiology, researchers may sometimes be too willing to accept this paradigm as an exclusive explanation of in vivo tissue responses during experiments, while overlooking confounding variables, alternative (non-mechanical) explanations, and the possibility that different types of bone (e.g., woven bone, Haversian bone, plexiform bone) may have different sensitivities to loading under healing vs. quiescent conditions.

Implant fixation by bone ingrowth

Abstract: The term osseointegration referred originally to an intimate contact of bone tissue with the surface of a titanium implant; the term bone ingrowth refers to bone formation within an irregular (beads, wire mesh, casting voids, cut grooves) surface of an implant. The section dealing with the historical background describes the development of macroporous, microporous, and textured surfaces with an emphasis on the evolution of porous and textured metal surfaces. The principal requirements for osseointegration and bone ingrowth are systematically reviewed as follows: i) the physiology of osseointegration and bone ingrowth, including biomaterial biocompatibility with respect to cellular and matrix response at the interface; ii) the implant surface geometry characteristics; iii) implant micromotion and fixation modes; and iv) the implant-bone interface distances. Based on current methods of bone ingrowth assessment, this article comparatively reviews and discusses the results of experimental studies with the objective of determining local and systemic factors that enhance bone ingrowth fixation.

The pathology of total joint arthroplasty.II. Mechanisms of implant failure.

Abstract: Although the clinical results of total joint arthroplasty are usually excellent, some implants develop loosening and require revision. Implants usually fail by a combination of mechanisms, but different basic designs tend to show different dominant mechanisms of failure. Infection causes failure of about 1–5% of cases of primary arthroplasty. Clues to the presence of infection include clinical signs, a periosteal reaction, a positive culture of aspirated joint fluid, and acute inflammation identified in tissue around the implant. There are several different mechanisms and modes of implant wear, and perhaps the most important cause of aseptic loosening is an inflammatory reaction to particles of wear debris. Abrasive, adhesive, and fatigue wear of polyethylene, metal and bone cement produces debris particles that induce bone resorption and implant loosening. Particles can cause linear, geographic, or erosive patterns of bone resorption (osteolysis), the distributions of which are influenced by the implant design. Micromotion of implants that did not achieve adequate initial fixation is another important mechanism of loosening. Fatigue failure at the bone/cement and bone/implant interface may cause aseptic loosening, and may be especially important for implants with relatively smooth surfaces. Stress shielding can influence local bone density, but is rarely an isolated cause of implant loosening. Elevated hydrodynamic pressure has been associated with bone resorption in the absence of implants, and may also play a role in implant loosening.

Vascularized bone flaps versus nonvascularized bone grafts for mandibular reconstruction: An outcome analysis of primary bony union and endosseous implant success

Abstract: Background Functional restoration following resection or traumatic injury to the mandible depends on the reliability of the bony reconstruction to heal primarily and support endosseous implants. Although vascularized bone flaps (VBF) and nonvascularized bone grafts (NVBG) are both widely used to reconstruct the mandible, indications for each remain ill-defined. The purpose of this study was to compare bone graft/flap healing and success of implant placement in patients reconstructed with VBF versus NVBG. Methods Over the past 10 years, 75 consecutive mandibular reconstructions were performed (26 free bone grafts, 49 vascularized bone flaps). Etiology of the defect, history of irradiation, bone defect size, number of operations, graft/flap success, and dental implant success rates were determined and compared. Bone graft/flap success was defined as complete bony union. Implant success was defined as complete osseointegration. Mean follow-up was 3 years. Results Free flaps were used primarily for malignant disease (78%, 38/49). Bone grafts were used primarily for benign disease (88%, 23/26). History of prior irradiation: 11% (3/26) NVBG versus 45% (22/49) VBF. Length of bony defect (mean): 8.1 cm NVBG versus 9.4 cm VBF. Successful bony union, any size defect: 69% (18/26) NVBG versus 96% (47/49) VBF (p Conclusions Despite the fact that patients reconstructed with VBFs were older, had larger defects, and were treated primarily for malignant disease and therefore had a higher incidence of irradiation to the affected mandible than in patients treated with NVBGs, the incidence of bony union was higher, requiring fewer operations to achieve union, and the implant success rate was significantly greater than for NVBG patients. Results were similar when considering lateral defects only. Based on these results, VBFs are indicated in most cases of mandibular reconstruction; NVBGs are effective for short bone defects (

A comparison of endosseous dental implant surfaces.

Abstract: Endosseous dental implants are available with various surface characteristics ranging from relatively smooth machined surfaces to more roughened surfaces created by coatings, blasting by various substances, by acid treatments, or by combinations of the treatments. Studies characterizing these implants and surfaces include in vitro experimentation, animal studies, and human clinical trials. Both descriptive and functional testing of the bone-implant interface includes histomorphometrics and biomechanical testing such as torque removal values and push out/pull out strength. Using these assays to evaluate and compare different surfaces, the data demonstrate that rough implant surfaces have increased bone-to-implant contact and require greater forces to break the bone-implant interface compared to more smooth surfaces. The objective of this report was to evaluate publications of human clinical experiences evaluating implant use in patients and to determine if differences existed in success rates of implants with relatively smooth surfaces compared to implants having roughened implant surfaces. Human trials were reviewed to determine the clinical efficacy of implants under various clinical indications. Synopsis tables were constructed and the experiences segregated by implant surface characteristics. Meta-analyses were performed on all implants in all locations, on implants placed only in the maxilla or the mandible, and, finally, on implants placed in the maxilla compared to implants placed in the mandible. Evaluation of the data revealed that predictably high success rates can be achieved for implants with both rough and smooth titanium surfaces and for hydroxyapatite-coated implants. When studies were clustered by specific indications or patient populations, rough surfaced implants had significantly higher success rates compared to implants with more smooth surfaces except in the case of single tooth replacements where the success rates were comparable. In general, implants placed in the mandible had significantly higher success rates than implants placed in the maxilla. However, in the partially edentulous patient group, titanium implants with a rough surface had significantly higher success rates in the maxilla compared to the mandible and, in cases of single tooth replacement, success rates were similar in the maxilla and in the mandible as was the case for hydroxyapatite-coated implants. The documented advantage of implants with a roughened surface in animal and in vitro experiments has been demonstrated in clinical cases when studies were compared in which specific indications or patients were treated. Additionally, implants placed in the mandible have, in general, higher success rates than implants placed in the maxilla, with only a few exceptions noted. These data from human clinical experiences support the documented advantage of implants with a roughened surface in animal and in vitro experimentation and indicate that the magnitude of the advantage is significant for patient care.

Tissue response to porous tantalum acetabular cups: a canine model.

Abstract: This study evaluated the osseous tissue response to a noncemented metal-backed acetabular component made of a new porous tantalum biomaterial. Eleven dogs with bilateral total hip arthroplasties (22 acetabular implants) were studied for a period of 6 months. Thin section histology, high-resolution radiography, and backscattered scanning electron microscopy revealed that all 22 implants had stable bone-implant interfaces. Regions of bone ingrowth were present in all histologic sections. The depth of bone ingrowth varied from 0.2 mm to the maximal limit of 2 mm. Analyzing contiguous regions of interest across the full bone-implant interface, the mean bone ingrowth for all sections was 16.8% +/- 5.7%. In the peripheral regions of the cup where bone-implant contact was most consistent, bone ingrowth averaged 25.1% +/- 10.1%. The data indicate that the porous tantalum material is effective for biologic fixation in the dog and may provide a suitable alternative to other porous materials used in acetabular cup design.

Clinical experience with one-stage, non-submerged dental implants.

Abstract: This review article describes the scientific documentation of one-stage, non-submerged dental implants. In the past 25 years, numerous in vivo studies have demonstrated that non-submerged titanium implants achieve osseointegration as predictable as that of submerged titanium implants. This observation was confirmed in prospective clinical studies, mostly done with the ITI Dental Implant System. ITI implants have been widely documented for up to 10 years of prospective follow-up at various centers. All studies showed success rates well above 90%. In summary, the non-submerged approach is a true alternative to the original healing modality with submerged titanium implants. The non-submerged approach offers several clinical advantages: (i) the avoidance of a second surgical procedure and less chair time per patient, resulting in overall reduced treatment cost; (ii) the lack of microgap at the bone crest level, leading to less crestal bone during healing and resulting in a more favorable crown-to-implant length ratio; and (iii) a simplified prosthetic procedure, presenting an ideal basis for cemented implant restorations. Due to these significant clinical advantages, the non-submerged approach will become more important in implant dentistry in the near future, particularly in implant sites without esthetic priority.

Augmentation of the sinus floor with mandibular bone block and simultaneous implantation: a 6-year clinical investigation.

Abstract: Between 1991 and 1995, 216 sinus-lift procedures were accomplished as part of a clinical study. The study involved placing 467 implants in the atrophic posterior maxillae of 142 female and 74 male patients. The initial bone height at the implant site was between 1 and 5 mm. The implants were supported subantrally with bone block grafts harvested from the retromolar or symphysis areas of the mandible. Perforations of the maxillary sinus membrane were observed in 51 patients; these were repaired with fibrin adhesive. The spaces remaining above the bone graft were filled with various materials. A total of 28 implants failed. All the remaining implants were deemed successfully osseointegrated, based on radiographic and clinical (including periodontal health) criteria. No patients experienced maxillary sinus complications. Clinically and radiographically, the best bone regeneration was observed in those patients in whom the surgically created space was completely grafted with autogenous bone that included a high percentage of resorption-resistant cortical bone. In those patients having bone grafts harvested from the mandibular symphysis, none of their facial profiles were adversely affected; however, some patients experienced neurosensory deficits involving the mandibular anterior incisors and adjacent alveolar mucosa. Occasionally, these symptoms persisted for up to 1 year following the procedure.

Lack of integration of smooth titanium surfaces: a working hypothesis based on strains generated in the surrounding bone.

Abstract: It has been observed that the polished neck of dental implants does not osseointegrate as do textured surfaces. Similar findings were reported in the orthopedic literature on artificial hip endoprostheses. In Dentistry, lack of osseointegration was attributed to increased pressure on the osseous bed during implant placement, establishment of a physiological "biologic width", stress shielding and lack of adequate biomechanical coupling between the load-bearing implant surface and the surrounding bone. Among the many variables that may affect osseointegration, this analysis proposes to include stress transfer as a significant one. Therefore the present report discusses the relationship between the stresses applied and bone homeostasis. Any viable osseous structure (including the tissue that surrounds the polished implant neck) is subjected to periodic phases of resorption and formation. Clinical and experimental data have shown the detrimental effects of lack of function in that bone mass decreases with time. Due to inadequate mechanical stimuli, bone that is resorbed during normal turnover is redeposited in lesser amounts than previously, a process observed clinically as resorption. The stress ranges which cause bone to resorb, maintain or increase its mass and the level that eventually causes bone to fracture have been delimited in the literature. Applying these values to the situation to dental implants, it follows that if it is to be stable, crestal bone must be subjected to suitable levels of mechanical stimulation. We suggest that smooth surfaces will not provide adequate biomechanical coupling with the bone surrounding the implant neck in that the stress range induced by a polished surface is limited. We propose that the surface texture of threaded, plasma-coated or sandblasted implants generates a heterogeneous stress field around an implant in function. By design, such a stress field includes force levels which are conducive to bone formation. Hence, during the formation phase of bone turnover, osteoblast lineages are much more likely to be stimulated by biomechanical signals of appropriate magnitude.

Complications associated with excess cement around crowns on osseointegrated implants: a clinical report.

Abstract: The potential advantages and disadvantages of cement-retained implant crowns are reviewed, with a focus on complications related to residual excess cement. A series of 4 case reports illustrates the symptoms and treatment modalities associated with excess cement around implant crowns, and suggestions are offered for the prevention of such problems. (INT J ORAL MAXILLOFAC IMPLANTS 1999;14:865‐868)

The pathology of total joint arthroplasty. I. Mechanisms of implant fixation.

Abstract: The clinical results of total joint arthroplasty are usually excellent, but surgeons, radiologists, and pathologists are often called upon to evaluate, in one way or another, the stability of the implants. These evaluations are aided by an understanding of the basic pathophysiology of total joint arthroplasty. The first part of this two-part review, will summarize the mechanisms whereby total joint implants achieve fixation. The second part will describe and illustrate the most important mechanisms of implant loosening. The "gold standard" for hip and knee arthroplasty is to use polymethylmethacrylate bone cement to anchor the implant to bone, but the optimal surface texture of cemented implants is controversial. Some surgeons advocate a rough implant texture to facilitate bonding between implant and cement; other surgeons prefer a smooth, polished implant to minimize abrasion of cement. Implant loosening can be initiated by particles of cement generated at either the implant/cement, or cement/bone interface. Uncemented implants with porous metal surfaces achieve a variable amount of bone ingrowth, but some designs have excellent clinical results. Maximal bone ingrowth usually occurs along surfaces that are relatively close to cortical bone. Implants with bioactive coatings, such as hydroxyapatite achieve rapid bone apposition. The amount of bone that persists on uncemented implants long-term is determined by many variables, inlcuding the quality of the coating, the overall implant design, and factors that influence local bone remodeling.

Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 stimulation of bone formation around endosseous dental implants

Abstract: Background: Successful endosseous implant placement requires that the implant be stable in alveolar bone. In certain cases, the implant can be stabilized in native bone but some part of the implant is not covered by bone tissue. This often occurs during placement of implants into extraction sites or in areas where bone resorption has occurred and the ridge width is not sufficient to completely surround the implant. In those cases, the clinician usually employs a procedure to encourage bone formation. These procedures typically include a bone graft and/or membrane therapy. Recent advances have led to the isolation, cloning, and production of recombinant human proteins that stimulate bone formation. One of these bone morphogenetic proteins (rhBMP-2) has been extensively studied in animal models and is currently being tested in human clinical trials. Methods: In this study, rhBMP-2 was tested using a collagen sponge carrier to stimulate bone formation in defects in the canine mandible around endosseous denta...

Method and apparatus for augmentating osteointegration of prosthetic implant devices

Abstract: Bone augmentation in a mammalian body to enhance the mechanical strength of a prosthesis is provided by reinforcement of bone in the region surrounding the implant device. A number of fibrillar wires are formed on the prosthetic implant device. Formation of the fibrillar wires comprises gauging the implant device so that the fibrillar wires are formed by peeling them from the implant device. Alternatively, formation of the fibrillar wires may comprise forming a mesh of fibrillar wires having a woolly structure, forming the mesh around the prosthetic implant device, and attaching a number of the fibrillar wires to the prosthetic implant device. A coating is formed on the fibrillar wires and an associated prosthetic implant device. The coating comprises bone morphogenetic proteins along with osteoinductive factors and osteoconductive factors that function as nutrients, anti-microbial and anti-inflammatory agents, and blood-clotting factors. The polymer is a polymer matrix component comprising lactic acid, glycolic acid, and copolymers of lactic acid and glycolic acid. The osteoinductive coating combined with the fibrillar wool or prongs should allow for optimal osteointegration and physiologic load distribution of a implant device resulting in prosthetic success when placed in the human body.

Peri‐implant tissues at submerged and non‐submerged titanium implants

Abstract: The present experiment was performed to study the peri-implant tissue response to non-submerged (1-stage) and initially submerged (2-stage) implant installation procedures. 6 beagle dogs were used. All mandibular premolars and the 1st, 2nd and 3rd maxillary premolars were extracted. After 3 months of healing, 3 fixtures of the Astra Tech System were installed and submerged in the right (or the left) edentulous, premolar region in each of the 6 dogs. Radiographs were obtained immediately after fixture installation. In the radiographs, the distance between the abutment-fixture junction and the most "coronal" bone in contact with the implant surface was determined. 3 months later, abutments were connected to the initially submerged fixtures and another 3 fixtures of the same system were installed in the contralateral, edentulous premolar region. Abutments were, however, immediately connected to the newly-installed fixtures (non-submerged side; test side). The mucosal flaps were replaced, adjusted and sutured in such a way that the coronal portion of the abutments remained exposed in the oral cavity. A new set of radiographs were obtained from all 6 implant sites in each animal. A period of plaque control was initiated. Clinical examinations were performed and radiographs obtained from all implant sites after another 3 months and at the termination of the experiment. 9 months after the 1st fixture installation procedure, the animals were sacrificed, the mandibles were removed, and each implant region dissected. The most mesially-located implant sites were processed for ground sectioning. The remaining biopsies were processed and embedded in EPON. The histometric analysis included assessment of the vertical dimension of the marginal soft and mineralized peri-implant tissues. The ground sections were used for measurements describing (i) "bone to implant contact" and (ii) "bone density". It was observed that the mucosa and bone tissue that formed at implants placed in a non-submerged or a submerged procedure had many features in common. Thus, figures describing (i) the height of the mucosa, (ii) the length of the junctional epithelium and the height and quality of the zone of "connective tissue integration", (iii) the % of bone to implant contact as well as (iv) the density of the peri-implant bone, were similar in the submerged and the non-submerged groups. It is therefore suggested that a non-submerged (1-stage) installation technique may provide conditions for tissue integration that are similar to those obtained using a submerged (2-stage) approach.

Hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stems: HISTOLOGY AND HISTOMORPHOMETRY AROUND FIVE COMPONENTS RETRIEVED AT POST MORTEM

Abstract: We performed a histological and histomorphometric examination in five cadaver specimens of the femoral and acetabular components and the associated tissue which had been recovered between 3.3 and 6.2 years after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) using a proximal hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated titanium alloy implant. All had functioned well during the patients' life. All the stems were fixed in the femur and showed osseointegration of both the proximal and distal parts. The amount of residual HA was greatest in the distal metaphyseal sections, indicating that the rate of bone remodelling may be the main factor causing loss of HA. The level of activity of the patient was the only clinical factor which correlated with loss of coating. The percentage of bone-implant osseointegration was almost constant, regardless of the amount of HA residue, periprosthetic bone density or the time of implantation. HA debris was seldom observed and if present did not cause any adverse or inflammatory reaction. Partial debonding did occur in one case as a result of a polyethylene-induced inflammatory reaction.

Surgical-prosthodontic reconstruction of advanced maxillary bone compromise with autogenous onlay block bone grafts and osseointegrated endosseous implants: a 12-year study of 32 consecutive patients.

Abstract: During a 12-year period (1984 to 1997), 32 consecutive patients with advanced maxillary bone compromise received surgical-prosthodontic rehabilitation. The most frequent procedure used was maxillary augmentation with a free nonvascularized autogenous onlay block bone graft, and the average time of prosthesis function was 67 months. Twenty-eight patients underwent a 1-stage procedure, in which endosseous implants were placed simultaneously for internal rigid skeletal fixation of the onlay bone graft, and 4 patients underwent a 2-stage procedure, in which endosseous implants were placed secondarily 6 months after complete healing of the previously placed onlay bone graft, which initially was stabilized by titanium miniplates and lag screws. Treatment success was evaluated separately for the first 7 consecutively treated patients (developmental group) and for the next 25 consecutive patients (routine group). Assessment was made of implant survival relative to etiology of bone loss, implant type and length, type of prosthesis, type of opposing occlusion, type of surgical procedure, and presence of discontinuity. The implant survival rate was 91% in the 25 routine patients and 65% in the 7 developmental patients. Implant type and length, prosthesis type, opposing occlusion, and the presence or absence of discontinuity significantly impacted treatment outcome. Onlay block bone graft success (96%) in all 32 treated patients and prosthetic success (96%) in the last 25 patients was recorded. (INT J ORAL MAXILLOFAC IMPLANTS 1999;14:197‐209)

Osseointegration of sintered porous-surfaced and plasma spray-coated implants: An animal model study of early postimplantation healing response and mechanical stability.

Abstract: The osseointegration and long-term success of bone-interfacing implants are dependent on mechanical stability of the implant relative to host bone during the early healing period. The geometric design of an implant surface may play an important role in affecting early implant stabilization, possibly by influencing tissue healing dynamics. In this study, we compared the early tissue healing response and resulting implant stability for two surface designs by characterizing the histological and mechanical properties of the healing tissue around Ti6Al4V sintered porous-surfaced and Ti plasma-sprayed implants. The implants were inserted transversely in rabbit femoral condyles and evaluated at 0, 4, 8, and 16 days postimplantation. At 4 and 8 days after implantation, the early healing tissue (fibrin and collagenous matrix) was more extensively integrated with the three-dimensional interconnected structure of the sintered porous surface than with the irregular geometry of the plasma-sprayed coating. In addition, histological examination indicated that initial matrix mineralization leading to osseointegration occurred more rapidly with the porous-surfaced implants. The more extensive tissue integration and more rapid matrix mineralization with the porous-surfaced implants were reflected in the mechanical test data, which demonstrated greater attachment strength and interfacial stiffness for the porous-surfaced implants 4 and 8 days postimplantation (p <.05). Sixteen days after implantation, both implant designs were osseointegrated and had comparable attachment characteristics. These data demonstrate that appropriate surface design selection can improve early implant stability and induce an accelerated healing response, thereby improving the potential for implant osseointegration.

Toward an understanding of implant occlusion and strain adaptive bone modeling and remodeling

Abstract: Statement of problem. Dental implant failure rates for osseointegration are greater in the highly atro-phic maxilla. Presuming higher failure rates relate to strain-driven adaptation, an enhanced understanding of formative bone response to loading (modeling) and maintenance of an integrated state (remodeling) should improve treatment. Purpose. To understand the role of occlusal loading on long-term osseointegration in areas of compromised cancellous bone, a review of the salient features of adaptive bone modeling and remodeling is presented with an emphasis on cancellous bone responses. Conclusions. The ability for dental implants to maintain a long-term stable interface in the maxilla lies in the ability of trabecular bone to maintain adequate local material (strength) and architectural (connectivity) properties. In this discussion, an emphasis has been placed on understanding how trabecular bone can respond to the mastication-induced loading environment on an implant. (J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:553-61.)