Aldert Vrij

TL;DR: This article investigated how much spatial and temporal detail is given by people who are discussing a true or false intention in a 26-question interview and whether the amount of temporal detail given can be manipulated by the phrasing of the question.

TL;DR: The impact of interview styles on lie detection was examined in this article, where truth tellers and liars were interviewed in three different ways: the interview started with an information-gathering interview style (phase 1), which then developed into an interrogation (phase 2), and finally transformed back into an information gathering interview style(phase 3).

TL;DR: This paper examined children's and undergraduates' verbal and nonverbal deceptive behavior, and the extent to which their truths and lies could be correctly classified by paying attention to these responses, and found that actual cues to deceit were remarkably similar across different age groups (for example, both 5-6-year-olds and undergraduate students obtained lower CBCA scores and made fewer movements while lying).

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors investigated the use of sequential lineup presentation and stringent decision criteria to aid the performance of older witnesses on lineups and found that sequential presentation was beneficial to both younger and older adults when the lineup was target absent (TA) but was detrimental when the lineups was target present (TP).

TL;DR: In this paper, the impact of nonverbal communication on impression formation is examined, including body language, such as movements people make, smiling, gaze behavior, etc., as well as vocal characteristics such as speech rate, speech pauses, uhms and ers, pitch of voice, etc.