A
Aldert Vrij
Researcher at University of Portsmouth
Publications - 401
Citations - 17189
Aldert Vrij is an academic researcher from University of Portsmouth. The author has contributed to research in topics: Deception & Lie detection. The author has an hindex of 63, co-authored 384 publications receiving 15810 citations. Previous affiliations of Aldert Vrij include University of Amsterdam.
Papers
More filters
Book ChapterDOI
Does Testimonial Inconsistency Indicate Memory Inaccuracy and Deception? Beliefs, Empirical Research, and Theory
TL;DR: Granhag et al. as discussed by the authors pointed out that good liars often simply repeat whatever they said earlier and, so, they may be more, not less, consistent than truth-tellers.
Journal ArticleDOI
Applying the Verifiability Approach to insurance claims settings: Exploring the effect of the information protocol
TL;DR: The Verifiability Approach, including the information protocol, can be used in insurance settings and encouraged truth tellers to provide more verifiable details than liars, and increased accuracy rates from around chance level to around 80%.
Journal ArticleDOI
Skulking Around the Dinosaur: Eliciting Cues to Children's Deception Via Strategic Disclosure of Evidence
Franziska Clemens,Pär Anders Granhag,Leif A. Strömwall,Aldert Vrij,Sara Landström,Emma Roos Af Hjelmsäter,Maria Hartwig +6 more
TL;DR: This paper found that deceptive statements were significantly more inconsistent with the evidence than truthful statements, and this was more pronounced as a function of late compared to early disclosure of evidence, and observed that deception elicited higher accuracy than chance (63.1%), whereas accuracy rates in the early disclosure condition were at chance level.
Journal ArticleDOI
‘Mapping’ deception in adolescents: Eliciting cues to deceit through an unanticipated spatial drawing task
TL;DR: This article examined whether an unanticipated spatial task could increase the differences between lying and truth-telling groups of adolescents, and explored whether there are some elements of such a spatial task that elicit more diagnostic cues to deception than others.
Journal ArticleDOI
Differences in suggestibility between 5–6 and 10–11 year olds: The relationship with self confidence
Aldert Vrij,Nicola Bush +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors investigated differences in suggestibility and recall between 5-6 and 10-11-year-olds and found that younger children were more suggestible than older children and that differences in self confidence between older and younger children would influence these differences.