A
Aldert Vrij
Researcher at University of Portsmouth
Publications - 401
Citations - 17189
Aldert Vrij is an academic researcher from University of Portsmouth. The author has contributed to research in topics: Deception & Lie detection. The author has an hindex of 63, co-authored 384 publications receiving 15810 citations. Previous affiliations of Aldert Vrij include University of Amsterdam.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
The time of the crime : Cognitively induced tonic arousal suppression when lying in a free recall context
TL;DR: It is demonstrated for the first time that when lying results in heightened levels of cognitive load, signs of nervousness are decreased.
Journal ArticleDOI
Tracking hand and finger movements for behaviour analysis
TL;DR: This work describes ongoing work into methods for the automated tracking of hand and finger movements in interview situations, and discusses the hand tracking algorithm based on blob feature extraction and the results obtained in a ''high-stakes experiment'', designed around a real-life situation.
Book ChapterDOI
The Verifiability Approach
Aldert Vrij,Galit Nahari +1 more
TL;DR: The Verifiability Approach as mentioned in this paper is based on the assumption that truth tellers will report more details that an investigator can check than liars, and it has been used to detect truth teller and liars with about 70% accuracy.
Journal ArticleDOI
Perceived advantages and disadvantages of secrets disclosure
TL;DR: In this article, 106 college students filled out a questionnaire investigating personality (preferred attachment style), being secretive and perceived advantages and disadvantages of secrets disclosure and found that being secretive was positively correlated with avoidant and anxious-ambivalent attachment styles.
Journal ArticleDOI
Lying Eyes: Why Liars Seek Deliberate Eye Contact
TL;DR: Mann et al. as discussed by the authors found that liars seek more eye contact because they want to convince the interviewer that they are telling the truth and want to check whether the interviewer appears to believe them.