A
Aldert Vrij
Researcher at University of Portsmouth
Publications - 401
Citations - 17189
Aldert Vrij is an academic researcher from University of Portsmouth. The author has contributed to research in topics: Deception & Lie detection. The author has an hindex of 63, co-authored 384 publications receiving 15810 citations. Previous affiliations of Aldert Vrij include University of Amsterdam.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
The impact of deception and suspicion on different hand movements
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examined the relationship between different types of discourse linked hand movements and deception and found that lying was associated with a decrease in deictic gestures, and an increase in metaphoric gestures (main effect of veracity).
Journal ArticleDOI
People's insight into their own behaviour and speech content while lying.
TL;DR: The present experiment examined participants' insight into their own behaviour and speech content while lying to support both hypotheses and implications of these outcomes for the detection of deception.
Journal ArticleDOI
Sorting the liars from the truth tellers: the benefits of asking unanticipated questions on lie detection
TL;DR: The authors examined the effect of asking unanticipated interview questions on lie detection and found that the first question of each pairing was easy for interviewees to anticipate, as it reflected how events are typically recalled, but the second included a perspective shift (temporal or spatial), which made the question harder to anticipate.
Journal ArticleDOI
Information-gathering vs accusatory interview style: individual differences in respondents’ experiences
TL;DR: The authors compared information gathering and accusatory interview styles in terms of respondents' perceptions of discomfort and cognitive demand, and the extent to which they felt they had been listened to, and found that respondents felt that they were listened to more in information gathering interviews than in accusatory interviews.
Journal ArticleDOI
A comparison between lying about intentions and past activities: verbal cues and detection accuracy
TL;DR: The authors compared lying about intentions and past activities and found that truthful intentions were more plausible and detailed than descriptions of deceptive intentions, while deception revealed more cues to deceit in the past activities interviews than in the intentions interviews.