scispace - formally typeset
A

Aldert Vrij

Researcher at University of Portsmouth

Publications -  401
Citations -  17189

Aldert Vrij is an academic researcher from University of Portsmouth. The author has contributed to research in topics: Deception & Lie detection. The author has an hindex of 63, co-authored 384 publications receiving 15810 citations. Previous affiliations of Aldert Vrij include University of Amsterdam.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The impact of individual differences on perceptions of lying in everyday life and in a high stake situation

TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigated the relationship of individual differences, perceptions of lying in everyday life and perceptions of deception in a high-stakes scenario (plagiarism at university).
Journal ArticleDOI

Using the model statement to elicit information and cues to deceit in interpreter-based interviews

TL;DR: How the presence of an interpreter during an interview affects eliciting information and cues to deceit, while using a method that encourages interviewees to provide more detail is examined, using a model statement, MS.
Journal ArticleDOI

Police Interrogation from a Social Psychology Perspective

TL;DR: In this article, the authors provide an overview of such studies of interrogation, and sheds light on two different interrogation techniques informed by a social psychological perspective, namely, the effects of interrogation techniques that aim at obtaining confessions and techniques that emphasize the importance of obtaining the truth.
Journal ArticleDOI

Baselining as a lie detection method

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors highlight some problems with the existing and popular nonverbal baseline lie detection method and with the use of the Validity Checklist in SVA and suggest how verbal within-subjects lie detection methods can be introduced in interview settings by implementing verbal lie detection interview protocols designed in recent years.
Journal ArticleDOI

The effect of question expectedness and experience on lying about intentions

TL;DR: The hypothesis that liars compared to truth tellers would give fewer details to unexpected questions about planning, transportation and the core event, but an equal amount or more detail to expected questions about the purpose of the trip is tested.