Cells continually experience stress and damage from exogenous and endogenous sources, and their responses range from complete recovery to cell death. Proliferating cells can initiate an additional response by adopting a state of permanent cell-cycle arrest that is termed cellular senescence. Understanding the causes and consequences of cellular senescence has provided novel insights into how cells react to stress, especially genotoxic stress, and how this cellular response can affect complex organismal processes such as the development of cancer and ageing.

Cellular senescence: when bad things happen to good cells

Added by telomerase, arrays of TTAGGG repeats specify the ends of human chromosomes. A complex formed by six telomere-specific proteins associates with this sequence and protects chromosome ends. By analogy to other chromosomal protein complexes such as condensin and cohesin, I will refer to this complex as shelterin. Three shelterin subunits, TRF1, TRF2, and POT1 directly recognize TTAGGG repeats. They are interconnected by three additional shelterin proteins, TIN2, TPP1, and Rap1, forming a complex that allows cells to distinguish telomeres from sites of DNA damage. Without the protective activity of shelterin, telomeres are no longer hidden from the DNA damage surveillance and chromosome ends are inappropriately processed by DNA repair pathways. How does shelterin avert these events? The current data argue that shelterin is not a static structural component of the telomere. Instead, shelterin is emerging as a protein complex with DNA remodeling activity that acts together with several associated DNA repair factors to change the structure of the telomeric DNA, thereby protecting chromosome ends. Six shelterin subunits: TRF1, TRF2, TIN2, Rap1, TPP1, and POT1.

/pdf/shelterin-the-protein-complex-that-shapes-and-safeguards-4nn8ijxqxb.pdf

Shelterin: the protein complex that shapes and safeguards human telomeres

https://delangelab.rockefeller.edu/pubs/50_Griffith_Cell_99.pdf

Mammalian Telomeres End in a Large Duplex Loop

Switching and Signaling at the Telomere

The genomes of prokaryotes and eukaryotic organelles are usually circular as are most plasmids and viral genomes. In contrast, the nuclear genomes of eukaryotes are organized on linear chromosomes, which require mechanisms to protect and replicate DNA ends. Eukaryotes navigate these problems with the advent of telomeres, protective nucleoprotein complexes at the ends of linear chromosomes, and telomerase, the enzyme that maintains the DNA in these structures. Mammalian telomeres contain a specific protein complex, shelterin, that functions to protect chromosome ends from all aspects of the DNA damage response and regulates telomere maintenance by telomerase. Recent experiments, discussed here, have revealed how shelterin represses the ATM and ATR kinase signaling pathways and hides chromosome ends from nonhomologous end joining and homology-directed repair.

http://delangelab.rockefeller.edu/pubs/108_Palm_AnnRevGen2008.pdf

How Shelterin Protects Mammalian Telomeres

Telomere length in human cells is controlled by a homeostasis mechanism that involves telomerase and the negative regulator of telomere length, TRF1 (TTAGGG repeat binding factor 1). Here we report that TRF2, a TRF1-related protein previously implicated in protection of chromosome ends, is a second negative regulator of telomere length. Overexpression of TRF2 results in the progressive shortening of telomere length, similar to the phenotype observed with TRF1. However, while induction of TRF1 could be maintained over more than 300 population doublings and resulted in stable, short telomeres, the expression of exogenous TRF2 was extinguished and the telomeres eventually regained their original length. Consistent with their role in measuring telomere length, indirect immunofluorescence indicated that both TRF1 and TRF2 bind to duplex telomeric DNA in vivo and are more abundant on telomeres with long TTAGGG repeat tracts. Neither TRF1 nor TRF2 affected the expression level of telomerase. Furthermore, the presence of TRF1 or TRF2 on a short linear telomerase substrate did not inhibit the enzymatic activity of telomerase in vitro. These findings are consistent with the recently proposed t loop model of telomere length homeostasis in which telomerase-dependent telomere elongation is blocked by sequestration of the 3' telomere terminus in TRF1- and TRF2-induced telomeric loops.

Control of human telomere length by TRF1 and TRF2.

TRF1 is a mammalian telomeric protein that binds to the duplex array of TTAGGG repeats at chromosome ends. TRF1 has homology to the DNA-binding domain of the Myb family of transcription factors but, unlike most Myb-related proteins, TRF1 carries one rather than multiple Myb-type DNA-binding motifs. Here we show that TRF1 binds DNA as a dimer using a large conserved domain near the N-terminus of the protein for TRF1-TRF1 interactions. Dimerization was observed both in a complex with DNA and in the yeast two-hybrid assay. TRF1 dimers were found to require both Myb repeats for the formation of a stable complex with DNA, indicating a parallel between the DNA-binding mode of TRF1 and other Myb-related proteins. TRF1 was found to have a number of biochemical similarities to Rap1p, a distantly related DNA-binding protein that functions at telomeres in yeast. Rap1p and TRF1 both require two Myb motifs for DNA binding and both factors bind along their cognate telomeric sequences without showing strong cooperative interactions between adjacent proteins. Furthermore, TRF1 was found to bend its telomeric site to an angle of -120 degrees. Since Rap1p similarly distorts telomeric DNA, we propose that DNA bending is important for the function of telomeres in yeast and mammals.

/pdf/trf1-is-a-dimer-and-bends-telomeric-dna-15m7ijrdbi.pdf

TRF1 is a dimer and bends telomeric DNA

In DNA repair, the resection of double-strand breaks dictates the choice between homology-directed repair—which requires a 3′ overhang—and classical non-homologous end joining, which can join unresected ends1,2. BRCA1-mutant cancers show minimal resection of double-strand breaks, which renders them deficient in homology-directed repair and sensitive to inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1)3–8. When BRCA1 is absent, the resection of double-strand breaks is thought to be prevented by 53BP1, RIF1 and the REV7–SHLD1–SHLD2–SHLD3 (shieldin) complex, and loss of these factors diminishes sensitivity to PARP1 inhibitors4,6–9. Here we address the mechanism by which 53BP1–RIF1–shieldin regulates the generation of recombinogenic 3′ overhangs. We report that CTC1–STN1–TEN1 (CST)10, a complex similar to replication protein A that functions as an accessory factor of polymerase-α (Polα)–primase11, is a downstream effector in the 53BP1 pathway. CST interacts with shieldin and localizes with Polα to sites of DNA damage in a 53BP1- and shieldin-dependent manner. As with loss of 53BP1, RIF1 or shieldin, the depletion of CST leads to increased resection. In BRCA1-deficient cells, CST blocks RAD51 loading and promotes the efficacy of PARP1 inhibitors. In addition, Polα inhibition diminishes the effect of PARP1 inhibitors. These data suggest that CST–Polα-mediated fill-in helps to control the repair of double-strand breaks by 53BP1, RIF1 and shieldin.

53BP1-RIF1-shieldin counteracts DSB resection through CST- and Polα-dependent fill-in.

TRF1 is a key player in telomere length regulation. Because length control was proposed to depend on the architecture of telomeres, we studied how TRF1 binds telomeric TTAGGG repeat DNA and alters its conformation. Although the single Myb‐type helix–turn–helix motif of a TRF1 monomer can interact with telomeric DNA, TRF1 predominantly binds as a homodimer. Systematic Evolution of Ligands by Exponential enrichment (SELEX) with dimeric TRF1 revealed a bipartite telomeric recognition site with extreme spatial variability. Optimal sites have two copies of a 5′–YTAGGGTTR–3′ half‐site positioned without constraint on distance or orientation. Analysis of binding affinities and DNase I footprinting showed that both half‐sites are simultaneously contacted by the TRF1 dimer, and electron microscopy revealed looping of the intervening DNA. We propose that a flexible segment in TRF1 allows the two Myb domains of the homodimer to interact independently with variably positioned half‐sites. This unusual DNA binding mode is directly relevant to the proposed architectural role of TRF1.

/pdf/trf1-binds-a-bipartite-telomeric-site-with-extreme-spatial-vf0tzx1k4s.pdf

Alessandro Bianchi

Papers

Mammalian Telomeres End in a Large Duplex Loop

Control of human telomere length by TRF1 and TRF2.

TRF1 is a dimer and bends telomeric DNA

53BP1-RIF1-shieldin counteracts DSB resection through CST- and Polα-dependent fill-in.

TRF1 binds a bipartite telomeric site with extreme spatial flexibility