Anthony M. Evans

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors report two studies, the first showing the psychometric properties of a new trust inventory (the Propensity to Trust Survey or PTS), the second study validating this inventory using the standard economic task, the investment game.

TL;DR: The size and variability of the effect of time pressure on cooperative decisions are assessed by combining 21 separate, preregistered replications of the critical conditions from Study 7 of the original article and the results are consistent with the presence of selection biases and the absence of a causal effect ofTime pressure on cooperation.

TL;DR: Evidence is provided that RTs should not be interpreted as a direct proxy for the use of intuitive or reflective processes, and the effects of conflict and reflection in social decision making are dissociate.

TL;DR: The authors argue that decision conflict (rather than the use of intuition vs reflection) drives response times, leading to an inverted-U shaped relationship between reaction times and cooperation, and they provide evidence that reaction times should not be interpreted as a direct proxy for intuition or reflection, and dissociate the effects of conflict and reflection in social decision making.

TL;DR: A review of contemporary theories of trust from behavioral economics and social psychology can be found in this article, where the authors investigate trust behavior in terms of an underlying disposition, intergroup processes, and cognitive expectations.