B
Barnabas Szaszi
Researcher at Eötvös Loránd University
Publications - 36
Citations - 987
Barnabas Szaszi is an academic researcher from Eötvös Loránd University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Medicine & Psychological intervention. The author has an hindex of 11, co-authored 28 publications receiving 508 citations.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
A Systematic Scoping Review of the Choice Architecture Movement: Toward Understanding When and Why Nudges Work
TL;DR: This paper provided a domain-general scoping review of the nudge movement by reviewing 422 choice architecture interventions in 156 empirical studies and found that 74% of these studies were mainly motivated to assess the effectiveness of the interventions in one specific setting, while only 24% of the studies focused on the exploration of moderators or underlying processes.
Journal ArticleDOI
Registered Replication Report : Rand, Greene, and Nowak (2012)
Samantha Bouwmeester,Peter P. J. L. Verkoeijen,Peter P. J. L. Verkoeijen,Balazs Aczel,Fernando Barbosa,Laurent Bègue,Pablo Brañas-Garza,T. G. H. Chmura,Gert Cornelissen,Felix Sebastian Døssing,Antonio M. Espín,Anthony M. Evans,Fernando Ferreira-Santos,Susann Fiedler,Jaroslav Flegr,Minou Ghaffari,Andreas Glöckner,Timo Goeschl,L. Guo,Oliver P. Hauser,Roberto Hernán-González,A. Herrero,Zachary Horne,Petr Houdek,Magnus Johannesson,Lina Koppel,Praveen Kujal,Tei Laine,Johannes Lohse,Eva Costa Martins,C. Mauro,Dorothee Mischkowski,Sumitava Mukherjee,Kristian Ove R. Myrseth,Daniel Navarro-Martinez,Tess M. S. Neal,Julie Novakova,R. Pagà,Tiago O. Paiva,Bence Palfi,Marco Piovesan,Rima-Maria Rahal,Erika Salomon,Narayanan Srinivasan,A. Srivastava,Barnabas Szaszi,Aba Szollosi,K. Ø. Thor,Gustav Tinghög,Jennifer S. Trueblood,J. J. Van Bavel,A. E. van t Veer,Daniel Västfjäll,M. Warner,Erik Wengström,Julian Wills,Conny Wollbrant +56 more
TL;DR: The size and variability of the effect of time pressure on cooperative decisions are assessed by combining 21 separate, preregistered replications of the critical conditions from Study 7 of the original article and the results are consistent with the presence of selection biases and the absence of a causal effect ofTime pressure on cooperation.
Journal ArticleDOI
A consensus-based transparency checklist
Balazs Aczel,Barnabas Szaszi,Alexandra Sarafoglou,Zoltan Kekecs,Šimon Kucharský,Daniel J. Benjamin,Christopher D. Chambers,Agneta Fisher,Andrew Gelman,Morton Ann Gernsbacher,John P. A. Ioannidis,Eric Johnson,Kai J. Jonas,Stavroula Kousta,Scott O. Lilienfeld,Scott O. Lilienfeld,D. Stephen Lindsay,Candice C. Morey,Marcus R. Munafò,Benjamin R. Newell,Harold Pashler,David R. Shanks,Daniel J. Simons,Jelte M. Wicherts,Dolores Albarracín,Nicole D. Anderson,John Antonakis,Hal R. Arkes,Mitja D. Back,George C. Banks,Christopher G. Beevers,Andrew A. Bennett,Wiebke Bleidorn,Ty W. Boyer,Cristina Cacciari,Alice S. Carter,Joseph Cesario,Charles Clifton,Ronan M. Conroy,Mike Cortese,Fiammetta Cosci,Nelson Cowan,Jarret T. Crawford,Eveline A. Crone,John J. Curtin,Randall W. Engle,Simon Farrell,Pasco Fearon,Mark Fichman,Willem E. Frankenhuis,Alexandra M. Freund,M. Gareth Gaskell,Roger Giner-Sorolla,Donald P. Green,Robert L. Greene,Lisa L. Harlow,Fernando Hoces de la Guardia,Derek M. Isaacowitz,Janet Kolodner,Debra Lieberman,Gordon D. Logan,Wendy Berry Mendes,Lea Moersdorf,Brendan Nyhan,Jeffrey M. Pollack,Christopher J. Sullivan,Simine Vazire,Eric-Jan Wagenmakers +67 more
TL;DR: A consensus-based checklist to improve and document the transparency of research reports in social and behavioural research and to submit with their manuscript or post to a public repository is presented.
Journal ArticleDOI
Quantifying Support for the Null Hypothesis in Psychology: An Empirical Investigation:
Balazs Aczel,Bence Palfi,Aba Szollosi,Marton Kovacs,Barnabas Szaszi,Peter Szecsi,Mark Zrubka,Quentin Frederik Gronau,Don van den Bergh,Eric-Jan Wagenmakers +9 more
TL;DR: This article examined empirically the treatment and evidential impact of nonsignificant results in the traditional statistical framework, leaving researchers in a state of suspended disbelief and concluded that nonsignificantly significant results leave researchers in suspended disbelief.
A billion-dollar donation: estimating the cost of researchers' time spent on peer review.
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors provided an estimate of researchers' time and the salary-based contribution to the journal peer review system and found that the total time reviewers globally worked on peer reviews was over 100 million hours in 2020, equivalent to over 15 thousand years.