scispace - formally typeset
B

Barnabas Szaszi

Researcher at Eötvös Loránd University

Publications -  36
Citations -  987

Barnabas Szaszi is an academic researcher from Eötvös Loránd University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Medicine & Psychological intervention. The author has an hindex of 11, co-authored 28 publications receiving 508 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

A Systematic Scoping Review of the Choice Architecture Movement: Toward Understanding When and Why Nudges Work

TL;DR: This paper provided a domain-general scoping review of the nudge movement by reviewing 422 choice architecture interventions in 156 empirical studies and found that 74% of these studies were mainly motivated to assess the effectiveness of the interventions in one specific setting, while only 24% of the studies focused on the exploration of moderators or underlying processes.
Journal ArticleDOI

Registered Replication Report : Rand, Greene, and Nowak (2012)

TL;DR: The size and variability of the effect of time pressure on cooperative decisions are assessed by combining 21 separate, preregistered replications of the critical conditions from Study 7 of the original article and the results are consistent with the presence of selection biases and the absence of a causal effect ofTime pressure on cooperation.
Journal ArticleDOI

A consensus-based transparency checklist

Balazs Aczel, +67 more
TL;DR: A consensus-based checklist to improve and document the transparency of research reports in social and behavioural research and to submit with their manuscript or post to a public repository is presented.
Journal ArticleDOI

Quantifying Support for the Null Hypothesis in Psychology: An Empirical Investigation:

TL;DR: This article examined empirically the treatment and evidential impact of nonsignificant results in the traditional statistical framework, leaving researchers in a state of suspended disbelief and concluded that nonsignificantly significant results leave researchers in suspended disbelief.

A billion-dollar donation: estimating the cost of researchers' time spent on peer review.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors provided an estimate of researchers' time and the salary-based contribution to the journal peer review system and found that the total time reviewers globally worked on peer reviews was over 100 million hours in 2020, equivalent to over 15 thousand years.