Evading persistent drug resistance in cancer and bacteria is quintessential to restore health in humans, and impels intervention strategies. A distinct property of the cancer phenotype is enhanced glucose metabolism and oxidative stress. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are metabolic byproducts of aerobic respiration and are responsible for maintaining redox homeostasis in cells. Redox balance and oxidative stress are orchestrated by antioxidant enzymes, reduced thiols and NADP(H) cofactors, which is critical for cancer cells survival and progression. Similarly, Escherichia coli (E. coli) and life-threatening infectious pathogens such as Staphylococcus aureus (SA) and Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) are appreciably sensitive to changes in the intracellular oxidative environment. Thus, small molecules that modulate antioxidant levels and/or enhance intracellular ROS could disturb the cellular oxidative environment and induce cell death, and hence could serve as novel therapeutics. Presented here are a collec...

Role of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) in Therapeutics and Drug Resistance in Cancer and Bacteria

Over the past 60 years, chemotherapeutic agents that target thymidylate biosynthesis and the enzyme thymidylate synthase (TS) have remained among the most-successful drugs used in the treatment of cancer. Fluoropyrimidines, such as 5-fluorouracil and capecitabine, and antifolates, such as methotrexate and pemetrexed, induce a state of thymidylate deficiency and imbalances in the nucleotide pool that impair DNA replication and repair. TS-targeted agents are used to treat numerous solid and haematological malignancies, either alone or as foundational therapeutics in combination treatment regimens. We overview the pivotal discoveries that led to the rational development of thymidylate biosynthesis as a chemotherapeutic target, and highlight the crucial contribution of these advances to driving and accelerating drug development in the earliest era of cancer chemotherapy. The function of TS as well as the mechanisms and consequences of inhibition of this enzyme by structurally diverse classes of drugs with distinct mechanisms of action are also discussed. In addition, breakthroughs relating to TS-targeted therapies that transformed the clinical landscape in some of the most-difficult-to-treat cancers, such as pancreatic, colorectal and non-small-cell lung cancer, are highlighted. Finally, new therapeutic agents and novel mechanism-based strategies that promise to further exploit the vulnerabilities and target resistance mechanisms within the thymidylate biosynthesis pathway are reviewed.

Standing the test of time: targeting thymidylate biosynthesis in cancer therapy

The purpose of this study was to identify predictive factors for severe toxicity caused by antifolate-chemotherapy using pemetrexed (ALIMTA, LY231514), as a model. Data on potential predictive factors for severe toxicity from pemetrexed were collected from 246 patients treated between 1995 and 1999. Multivariate stepwise regression methods were used to identify markers predictive of severe toxicity. Using a multiple logistic regression model allowed us to quantify the relative risk of developing toxicities and to generate a validated clinical hypothesis on ways to improve the safety profile of pemetrexed. Pretreatment total plasma homocysteine (tHcy) levels significantly predict severe thrombocytopenia and neutropenia with or without associated grade 3/4 diarrhea, mucositis, or infection. Pretreatment methylmalonic acid (MMA) levels significantly and independently predict grade 3/4 diarrhea and mucositis; however, these toxicities are still predicted by tHcy alone. Patients with elevated baseline levels of tHcy alone, or of both tHcy and MMA, were found to have a high risk of severe toxicity that led us to postulate that reducing tHcy would result in a reduction of severe toxicity with no harm to efficacy. This study points out for the first time the importance of pretreatment tHcy levels in predicting severe toxicity associated with an antifolate and sets the stage for a prospective clinical intervention to protect patients from pemetrexed-induced severe toxicity and possibly improve the drug's efficacy. Antifolates as a class have been associated with sporadic severe myelosuppression with gastrointestinal toxicity. Although infrequent, a combination of such toxicities can carry a high risk of mortality. This phenomenon had been unpredictable until now. Our work shows that by measuring tHcy, one can identify patients that are at risk of toxicity before treatment. Most importantly, decreasing homocysteine levels via vitamin supplementation leads to a better safety profile of pemetrexed and possibly to an improved efficacy.

https://mct.aacrjournals.org/content/molcanther/1/7/545.full.pdf

Homocysteine and methylmalonic acid: markers to predict and avoid toxicity from pemetrexed therapy.

The use of nanomedicine for cancer treatment takes advantage of its preferential accumulation in tumors owing to the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect. The development of cancer nanomedicine has promised highly effective treatment options unprecedented by standard therapeutics. However, the therapeutic efficacy of passively targeted nanomedicine is not always satisfactory because it is largely influenced by the heterogeneity of the intensity of the EPR effect exhibited within a tumor, at different stages of a tumor, and among individual tumors. In addition, limited data on EPR effectiveness in human hinders further clinical translation of nanomedicine. This unsatisfactory therapeutic outcome in mice and humans necessitates novel approaches to improve the EPR effect. This review focuses on current attempts at overcoming the limitations of traditional EPR-dependent nanomedicine by incorporating supplementary strategies, such as additional molecular targeting, physical alteration, or physiological remodeling of the tumor microenvironment. This review will provide valuable insight to researchers who seek to overcome the limitations of relying on the EPR effect alone in cancer nanomedicine and go "beyond the EPR effect".

Alliance with EPR Effect: Combined Strategies to Improve the EPR Effect in the Tumor Microenvironment.

It has been suggested that chemotherapy and radiotherapy could favorably be combined with antiangiogenesis in dual anticancer strategy combinations. Here we investigate the effects of a trimodal strategy consisting of all three therapy approaches administered concurrently. We found that in vitro and in vivo, the antiendothelial and antitumor effects of the triple therapy combination consisting of SU11657 (a multitargeted small molecule inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor and platelet-derived growth factor receptor tyrosine kinases), Pemetrexed (a multitargeted folate antimetabolite), and ionizing radiation were superior to all single and dual combinations. The superior effects in human umbilical vein endothelial cells and tumor cells (A431) were evident in cell proliferation, migration, tube formation, clonogenic survival, and apoptosis assays (sub-G1 and caspase-3 assessment). Exploring potential effects on cell survival signaling, we found that radiation and chemotherapy induced endothelial cell Akt phosphorylation, but SU11657 could attenuate this process in vitro and in vivo in A431 human tumor xenografts growing s.c. on BALB/c nu/nu mice. Triple therapy further decreased tumor cell proliferation (Ki-67 index) and vessel count (CD31 staining), and induced greater tumor growth delay versus all other therapy regimens without increasing apparent toxicity. When testing different treatment schedules for the A431 tumor, we found that the regimen with radiotherapy (7.5 Gy single dose), given after the institution of SU11657 treatment, was more effective than radiotherapy preceding SU11657 treatment. Accordingly, we found that SU11657 markedly reduced intratumoral interstitial fluid pressure from 8.8 +/- 2.6 to 4.2 +/- 1.5 mm Hg after 1 day. Likewise, quantitative T2-weighed magnetic resonance imaging measurements showed that SU11657-treated mice had reduced intratumoral edema. Our data indicates that inhibition of Akt signaling by antiangiogenic treatment with SU11657 may result in: (a) normalization of tumor blood vessels that cause prerequisite physiologic conditions for subsequent radio/chemotherapy, and (b) direct resensitization of endothelial cells to radio/chemotherapy. We conclude that trimodal cancer therapy combining antiangiogenesis, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy has beneficial molecular and physiologic effects to emerge as a clinically relevant antitumor strategy.

https://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/canres/65/9/3643.full.pdf

Trimodal Cancer Treatment: Beneficial Effects of Combined Antiangiogenesis, Radiation, and Chemotherapy

In countries with the best cancer outcomes, approximately 60% of patients receive radiotherapy as part of their treatment, which is one of the most cost-effective cancer treatments. Notably, around 40% of cancer cures include the use of radiotherapy, either as a single modality or combined with other treatments. Radiotherapy can provide enormous benefit to patients with cancer. In the past decade, significant technical advances, such as image-guided radiotherapy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy, stereotactic radiotherapy, and proton therapy enable higher doses of radiotherapy to be delivered to the tumour with significantly lower doses to normal surrounding tissues. However, apart from the combination of traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy with radiotherapy, little progress has been made in identifying and defining optimal targeted therapy and radiotherapy combinations to improve the efficacy of cancer treatment. The National Cancer Research Institute Clinical and Translational Radiotherapy Research Working Group (CTRad) formed a Joint Working Group with representatives from academia, industry, patient groups and regulatory bodies to address this lack of progress and to publish recommendations for future clinical research. Herein, we highlight the Working Group's consensus recommendations to increase the number of novel drugs being successfully registered in combination with radiotherapy to improve clinical outcomes for patients with cancer.

/pdf/clinical-development-of-new-drug-radiotherapy-combinations-1fdzmntigi.pdf

Clinical development of new drug-radiotherapy combinations

Pemetrexed disodium (ALIMTA), "pemetrexed") is a novel, multi-targeted antifolate that has demonstrated promising clinical activity in a wide variety of solid tumors, including non-small cell lung, breast, mesothelioma, colorectal, pancreatic, gastric, bladder, cervix, and head and neck. Pemetrexed inhibits multiple folate-dependent enzymes involved in both purine and pyrimidine synthesis including thymidylate synthase, dihydrofolate reductase, glycinamide ribonucleotide formyltransferase, and aminoimidazole carboxamide ribonucleotide formyltransferase. As a single agent, pemetrexed exhibits a moderate toxicity profile at a dose of 500 mg/m(2) by 10-minute infusion once every 21 days with myelosuppression being the dose-limiting toxicity. Folic acid added to the diet in preclinical studies reduced toxicities while maintaining antitumor activity. Based on this observation and clinical toxicities, folic acid and vitamin B(12) dietary supplementation has been recently introduced into all ongoing trials. Studies combining pemetrexed with other active chemotherapeutic agents demonstrate that these combination therapies may become important treatment regimens in a variety of cancer types. Currently, pemetrexed phase III trials are ongoing in mesothelioma and non-small cell lung cancer with future trials planned to explore this unique multitargeted antifolate.

Pemetrexed Disodium: A Novel Antifolate Clinically Active Against Multiple Solid Tumors

Pemetrexed safety and dosing strategy.

Overview

Over the past 10 years, the approach to drug development has changed considerably. Owing to the enormous increase in insights into the molecular biology of cancer cells, a largely empirical approach has been mostly abandoned and replaced with a biology-driven, hypothesis-based, and translational approach. Notwithstanding this dramatic development, the hierarchical sequence of clinical drug-development trials basically remained unchanged and is divided into three phases. This chapter provides an overview of the various steps of early clinical development with milestones of the drug-development process, the role of the National Cancer Institute, and the switch to mechanism-based drug development. It outlines challenges in the clinical development of these new agents and provides a fundamental understanding of the complexity involved in early clinical drug development.


Keywords:

drug discovery;
National Cancer Institute;
mechanistically based drug development;
Phase I;
Phase II;
protein-engineered compounds;
pharmacokinetics;
pharmacodynamics;
dose escalation;
dose-limiting toxicities;
maximum tolerated dose;
combination trials

Axel-R Hanauske

Papers

Clinical development of new drug-radiotherapy combinations

Pemetrexed Disodium: A Novel Antifolate Clinically Active Against Multiple Solid Tumors

Pemetrexed safety and dosing strategy.

Preclinical and Early Clinical Development of Chemotherapeutic Drugs, Mechanism‐Based Agents and Biologics