scispace - formally typeset
D

Daniel J. Caldwell

Researcher at Johnson & Johnson

Publications -  13
Citations -  2197

Daniel J. Caldwell is an academic researcher from Johnson & Johnson. The author has contributed to research in topics: Predicted no-effect concentration & Environmental exposure. The author has an hindex of 12, co-authored 13 publications receiving 1842 citations. Previous affiliations of Daniel J. Caldwell include Temple University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Predicted-no-effect concentrations for the steroid estrogens estrone, 17β-estradiol, estriol, and 17α-ethinylestradiol

TL;DR: In vivo vitellogenin (VTG) induction studies are used to determine the relative potency of the steroid estrogens to induce VTG and, based on the relative differences between in vivo VTG induction, they derive PNECs of 6 and 60 ng/L for E1 and E3, respectively.
Journal ArticleDOI

Derivation of an Aquatic Predicted No-Effect Concentration for the Synthetic Hormone, 17α-Ethinyl Estradiol

TL;DR: A species sensitivity distribution was constructed using no observed effect concentrations (NOECs) for reproductive effects from 39 papers in 26 species, resulting in a median hazardous concentration at which 5% of the species tested are affected (HC5,50) of 0.35 ng/L, which is recommended as the PNEC for EE2 in surface water.
Journal ArticleDOI

Exposure assessment of 17α-ethinylestradiol in surface waters of the United States and Europe

TL;DR: A review of analytical methods suggests that tandem or high-resolution mass spectrometry methods with extract cleanup result in lower detection limits and lower reported concentrations consistent with model predictions and bounding estimates, which represent conservative estimates of long-term exposure that can be used for risk assessment purposes.
Journal ArticleDOI

An Assessment of Potential Exposure and Risk from Estrogens in Drinking Water

TL;DR: The consistently large MOEs and MOSs strongly suggest that prescribed and total estrogens that may potentially be present in drinking water in the United States are not causing adverse effects in U.S. residents, including sensitive subpopulations.