J
Jane P. Staveley
Researcher at Exponent
Publications - 21
Citations - 1482
Jane P. Staveley is an academic researcher from Exponent. The author has contributed to research in topics: Risk assessment & Trenbolone. The author has an hindex of 10, co-authored 20 publications receiving 1244 citations.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Pharmaceuticals and personal care products in the environment: what are the big questions?
Alistair B.A. Boxall,Murray A. Rudd,Bryan W. Brooks,Daniel J. Caldwell,Kyungho Choi,Silke Hickmann,Elizabeth Innes,Kim Ostapyk,Jane P. Staveley,Tim Verslycke,Gerald T. Ankley,Karen F. Beazley,Scott E. Belanger,Jason P. Berninger,Pedro Carriquiriborde,Anja Coors,Paul C. DeLeo,Scott D. Dyer,Jon F. Ericson,François Gagné,John P. Giesy,Todd Gouin,Lars K Hallstrom,Maja V. Karlsson,D. G. Joakim Larsson,James M. Lazorchak,Frank Mastrocco,Alison McLaughlin,Mark E. McMaster,Roger D. Meyerhoff,Roberta Moore,Joanne L. Parrott,Jason Snape,Richard Murray-Smith,Mark R. Servos,Paul K. Sibley,Juerg Oliver Straub,Nora D. Szabo,Edward Topp,Gerald R. Tetreault,Vance L. Trudeau,Glen Van Der Kraak +41 more
TL;DR: This exercise prioritized the most critical questions regarding the effects of PPCPs on human and ecological health in order to ensure that future resources will be focused on the most important areas.
Journal ArticleDOI
A Causal Analysis of Observed Declines in Managed Honey Bees (Apis mellifera).
TL;DR: A workshop was convened during which bee experts were introduced to a formal causal analysis approach to compare 39 candidate causes against specified criteria to evaluate their relationship to the reduced overwinter survivability observed since 2006 of commercial bees used in the California almond industry.
Journal ArticleDOI
Critical comments on the WHO-UNEP State of the Science of Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals - 2012.
James C. Lamb,Paolo Boffetta,Warren G. Foster,Julie E. Goodman,Karyn L. Hentz,Lorenz R. Rhomberg,Jane P. Staveley,Gerard Swaen,Glen Van Der Kraak,Amy Lavin Williams +9 more
TL;DR: Overall, the 2012 update to the 2002 State of the Science of Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals does not provide a balanced perspective, nor does it accurately reflect the state of the science on endocrine disruption.
Journal ArticleDOI
Relevance weighting of tier 1 endocrine screening endpoints by rank order.
Christopher J. Borgert,Leah D. Stuchal,Ellen Mihaich,Richard A. Becker,Karin S. Bentley,John M. Brausch,Katie Coady,David R. Geter,Elliot B. Gordon,Patrick D. Guiney,Frederick G. Hess,Catherine M. Holmes,Matthew J. LeBaron,Steve L. Levine,Sue Marty,Sandeep Mukhi,Barbara H. Neal,Lisa S. Ortego,David Saltmiras,Suzanne I. Snajdr,Jane P. Staveley,Abraham Tobia +21 more
TL;DR: Detailed rationale for weighting the ESB endpoints according to three rank ordered categories and an interpretive process for using the rankings to reach WoE determinations are presented.
Journal ArticleDOI
The drive to ban the NOEC/LOEC in favor of ECx is misguided and misinformed
TL;DR: This article presents an opposing view, providing reasons for the continued use of the NOEC, and for hypothesis testing in general, and examples are presented with recommended data analysis techniques, illustrating the variety of statistical approaches that are meaningful in analyzing ecotoxicity data.