D
David Spiegel
Researcher at Stanford University
Publications - 838
Citations - 50967
David Spiegel is an academic researcher from Stanford University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Cancer & Medicine. The author has an hindex of 106, co-authored 733 publications receiving 46276 citations. Previous affiliations of David Spiegel include Tel Aviv University & University of Adelaide.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Do psychosocial factors influence the course of breast cancer? A review of recent literature, methodological problems and future directions
TL;DR: In this article, a review of psycho-oncology research studies with breast cancer patients including those employing cross-sectional, longitudinal and experimental designs is presented, and methodological problems and future directions for this line of research are discussed.
Journal ArticleDOI
International Prevalence and Correlates of Psychological Stress during the Global COVID-19 Pandemic.
Maheen M. Adamson,Angela Phillips,Angela Phillips,Srija Seenivasan,Julian Martinez,Harlene Grewal,Xiaojian Kang,John P. Coetzee,John P. Coetzee,Ines Luttenbacher,Ashley Jester,Odette A. Harris,David Spiegel +12 more
TL;DR: This study reports perceived stress and associated sociodemographic factors from an international sample of adults, during the COVID-19 pandemic, providing insight into potential mental health risks and protective factors during crises.
Journal ArticleDOI
Negative and Positive Visual Hypnotic Hallucinations: Attending Inside and Out
TL;DR: Positive obstructive hallucinations seem to allow for a hypnotic focus inward, activating the functioning of attentional neural systems and reducing perceptual ones.
Journal ArticleDOI
Ten-Year Experience with Sevelamer and Calcium Salts as Phosphate Binders
TL;DR: There are at least indications that sevelamer may improve vascular and bone health and, perhaps, mortality in hemodialysis patients, whereas data on calcium-based binders are lacking.
Journal ArticleDOI
Do oblique views add value in the diagnosis of spondylolysis in adolescents
Nicholas A. Beck,Robert Miller,Keith D. Baldwin,Xiaowei Zhu,David Spiegel,Denis S. Drummond,Wudbhav N. Sankar,John M. Flynn +7 more
TL;DR: The data could not identify a diagnostic benefit that might outweigh the additional cost and radiation exposure of oblique views in the diagnosis of spondylolysis and there was no significant difference in sensitivity and specificity between four-view and two-view radiographs.