E
Edward J. Imwinkelried
Researcher at University of California, Davis
Publications - 97
Citations - 551
Edward J. Imwinkelried is an academic researcher from University of California, Davis. The author has contributed to research in topics: Scientific evidence & Supreme court. The author has an hindex of 11, co-authored 97 publications receiving 522 citations. Previous affiliations of Edward J. Imwinkelried include Washington and Lee University & Brooklyn Law School.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Jurors' perceptions of hearsay in child sexual abuse cases.
Latent Print Examination and Human Factors: Improving the Practice through a Systems Approach
Melissa K. Taylor,David H. Kaye,Thomas A. Busey,Melissa R. Gische,Gerry LaPorte,Colin Aitken,Susan M. Ballou,Leonard Butt,Christophe Champod,David Charlton,Itiel E. Dror,Jules Epstein,Robert J. Garrett,Max M. Houck,Edward J. Imwinkelried,Ralph Keaton,Glenn Langenburg,Deborah A. Leben,Alice Maceo,Kenneth F. Martin,Jennifer L. Mnookin,Cedric Neumann,Joe Polski,Maria Antonia Roberts,Scott A. Shappell,Lyle Shaver,Sargur N. Srihari,Hal S. Stern,David A. Stoney,Anjali Swienton,Mary F. Theofanos,Robert M. Thompson,John Vanderkolk,Maria Weir,Kasey Wertheim +34 more
Journal ArticleDOI
Forensic bitemark identification: weak foundations, exaggerated claims.
Michael J. Saks,Thomas D. Albright,Thomas L. Bohan,Barbara E. Bierer,C. Michael Bowers,Mary A. Bush,Peter J. Bush,Arturo Casadevall,Simon A. Cole,M. Bonner Denton,Shari Seidman Diamond,Rachel Dioso-Villa,Jules Epstein,David L. Faigman,Lisa Faigman,Stephen E. Fienberg,Brandon L. Garrett,Paul C. Giannelli,Henry T. Greely,Edward J. Imwinkelried,Allan Jamieson,Karen Kafadar,Jerome P. Kassirer,Jonathan J. Koehler,David Korn,Jennifer L. Mnookin,Alan B. Morrison,Erin Murphy,Nizam Peerwani,Joseph L. Peterson,D. Michael Risinger,George Sensabaugh,Clifford H. Spiegelman,Hal S. Stern,William C. Thompson,James L. Wayman,Sandy L. Zabell,Ross E. Zumwalt +37 more
TL;DR: The rise and possible fall of bitemark identification evidence has broader implications—highlighting the weak scientific culture of forensic science and the law's difficulty in evaluating and responding to unreliable and unscientific evidence.