G
Gregory E. Kersten
Researcher at Concordia University
Publications - 173
Citations - 4128
Gregory E. Kersten is an academic researcher from Concordia University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Negotiation & Decision support system. The author has an hindex of 35, co-authored 173 publications receiving 3977 citations. Previous affiliations of Gregory E. Kersten include Université du Québec & University of Ottawa.
Papers
More filters
Proceedings ArticleDOI
Multi-attribute Procurement Auctions and Negotiations: An Experimental Comparison
Shikui Wu,Gregory E. Kersten +1 more
TL;DR: Comparisons of multi-attribute auctions and multi-bilateral negotiations in e-procurement show that auctions are more efficient than negotiations in terms of the process, while the two mechanisms outperform each other on the outcomes.
Book ChapterDOI
The Role of Sentiment and Cultural Differences in the Communication Process of e-Negotiations
TL;DR: Examination of interactions between communication processes, language, and cultural differences in dyadic e-negotiations finds evidence that the more positive a message’s sentiment, the morepositive the sentiment of the next message.
Journal ArticleDOI
Beyond Dynamic Pricing: Dynamic Product Configuration with Auction/Negotiation Mechanisms
TL;DR: In this article, the relationship between the price and other attributes is illustrated with a simple exchange in which the buyer's utility is linear and the sellers' utilities are Cobb-Douglass production functions with increasing returns to scale.
Journal ArticleDOI
Business Negotiations on Web: Experiences at IIMB
TL;DR: Negotiation and bargaining are one of the most common forms of making decisions and resolving conflicts at every organizational level, between countries and small and large organizations and between individuals in every culture as mentioned in this paper.
Proceedings ArticleDOI
User Assessment of E-negotiation Systems
TL;DR: A follow up study that uses structured equation modeling to verify AMIS and its empirical results is presented, focusing on the examination of the users' assessment of the system and their intention to use it, while taking into consideration its key features.