scispace - formally typeset
H

Helen Christensen

Researcher at University of New South Wales

Publications -  629
Citations -  58443

Helen Christensen is an academic researcher from University of New South Wales. The author has contributed to research in topics: Mental health & Psychological intervention. The author has an hindex of 116, co-authored 596 publications receiving 48002 citations. Previous affiliations of Helen Christensen include Centre for Mental Health & Arcadia University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The impact of employee level and work stress on mental health and GP service use: an analysis of a sample of Australian government employees

TL;DR: Measures of work stress and not employee level affect the mental health and well-being of government employees, and men at more junior levels reported better mental health, more positive affect and used fewer GP services than their more senior counterparts.
Journal ArticleDOI

The effect of education on the onset and rate of terminal decline.

TL;DR: The rate and onset of terminal decline varied somewhat across cognitive domains, but this modification was not consistent with the predictions of cognitive reserve theory.
Posted ContentDOI

Acute mental health responses during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia

TL;DR: Results highlight the serious acute impact of COVID-19 on the mental health of respondents, and the need for proactive, accessible digital mental health services to address these mental health needs, particularly for those most vulnerable, including people with prior history of mental health problems.
Journal ArticleDOI

Cluster randomised controlled trial of the e-couch Anxiety and Worry program in schools

TL;DR: The e-couch Anxiety and Worry program did not have a significant positive effect on participant mental health or wellbeing and the addition of a mental health education officer to support classroom teachers in the delivery of the program had no effect on intervention outcomes.
Journal ArticleDOI

Sampling bias in an internet treatment trial for depression.

TL;DR: It is demonstrated that, among eligible trial participants, few factors were associated with the consent to participate and there was no indication that such self-selection biased the trial results or would limit the generalizability and translation into a public or clinical setting.