Helen Pallett

TL;DR: In this paper, a conceptual framework for understanding ecologies of participation in socio-technical and democratic systems, grounded in relational co-productionist theory in science and technology studies, is developed.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examine organisationally situated processes of learning related to public participation in science and environmental governance, and explore frames of participation, publics, and the issue of climate change, both transforming and stable.

TL;DR: The process outlined below underlines the value of interdisciplinary exchange for improving communication across different research cultures and identifies ways of enhancing the effectiveness of future research at the interface between the humanities, social sciences, science and science policy.

TL;DR: The authors argue that organizations do not exist and evolve in isolation, but are co-produced through networked connections to other spaces, bodies and practices, and furthermore, organizations should not be studied as stable entities but are constantly in the making, which has implications for how geographers theorize, study and intervene in organizations at the science-policy interface with respect to encouraging learning and change and in the roles we adopt within and around such organizations.

TL;DR: Chilvers et al. as mentioned in this paper present a systemic approach to participation that combines mapping diverse public engagements across a national energy system with a distributed deliberative mapping process involving citizens and specialists, which shows support for more distributed and inclusive energy system futures.