scispace - formally typeset
J

Jack L. Lancaster

Researcher at University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio

Publications -  224
Citations -  29985

Jack L. Lancaster is an academic researcher from University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio. The author has contributed to research in topics: Spatial normalization & Transcranial magnetic stimulation. The author has an hindex of 79, co-authored 222 publications receiving 27794 citations. Previous affiliations of Jack L. Lancaster include University of Texas at San Antonio & University of Utah.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Automated Talairach Atlas labels for functional brain mapping

TL;DR: When used in concert with authors' deeper knowledge of an experiment, the TD system provides consistent and comprehensive labels for brain activation foci, which is better than that of the expert group.
Journal ArticleDOI

Reciprocal limbic-cortical function and negative mood: converging PET findings in depression and normal sadness

TL;DR: Reciprocal changes involving subgenual cingulate and right prefrontal cortex occur with both transient and chronic changes in negative mood, suggesting that these regional interactions are obligatory and probably mediate the well-recognized relationships between mood and attention seen in both normal and pathological conditions.
Journal ArticleDOI

A probabilistic atlas and reference system for the human brain: International Consortium for Brain Mapping (ICBM)

TL;DR: The ability to quantify the variance of the human brain as a function of age in a large population of subjects for whom data is also available about their genetic composition and behaviour will allow for the first assessment of cerebral genotype-phenotype-behavioural correlations in humans to take place in a population this large.
Journal ArticleDOI

Bias between MNI and Talairach coordinates analyzed using the ICBM-152 brain template

TL;DR: An MNI‐to‐Talairach (MTT) transform to correct for bias between MNI and Talairach coordinates was formulated using a best‐fit analysis in one hundred high‐resolution 3‐D MR brain images.