Accurate measurement of blood pressure is essential to classify individuals, to ascertain blood pressure-related risk, and to guide management. The auscultatory technique with a trained observer and mercury sphygmomanometer continues to be the method of choice for measurement in the office, using the first and fifth phases of the Korotkoff sounds, including in pregnant women. The use of mercury is declining, and alternatives are needed. Aneroid devices are suitable, but they require frequent calibration. Hybrid devices that use electronic transducers instead of mercury have promise. The oscillometric method can be used for office measurement, but only devices independently validated according to standard protocols should be used, and individual calibration is recommended. They have the advantage of being able to take multiple measurements. Proper training of observers, positioning of the patient, and selection of cuff size are all essential. It is increasingly recognized that office measurements correlate poorly with blood pressure measured in other settings, and that they can be supplemented by self-measured readings taken with validated devices at home. There is increasing evidence that home readings predict cardiovascular events and are particularly useful for monitoring the effects of treatment. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory monitoring gives a better prediction of risk than office measurements and is useful for diagnosing white-coat hypertension. There is increasing evidence that a failure of blood pressure to fall during the night may be associated with increased risk. In obese patients and children, the use of an appropriate cuff size is of paramount importance.

/pdf/recommendations-for-blood-pressure-measurement-in-humans-and-19z5w6eq69.pdf

Recommendations for Blood Pressure Measurement in Humans and Experimental Animals Part 1: Blood Pressure Measurement in Humans: A Statement for Professionals From the Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research

https://cyberleninka.org/article/n/148766.pdf

Cytochrome P450 enzymes in drug metabolism: Regulation of gene expression, enzyme activities, and impact of genetic variation

http://academic.oup.com/milmed/article-pdf/146/7/506/24126715/milmed-146-7-506.pdf

Goodman and Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics

The self-medication hypothesis of addictive disorders derives primarily from clinical observations of patients with substance use disorders. Individuals discover that the specific actions or effects of each class of drugs relieve or change a range of painful affect states. Self-medication factors occur in a context of self-regulation vulnerabilities--primarily difficulties in regulating affects, self-esteem, relationships, and self-care. Persons with substance use disorders suffer in the extreme with their feelings, either being overwhelmed with painful affects or seeming not to feel their emotions at all. Substances of abuse help such individuals to relieve painful affects or to experience or control emotions when they are absent or confusing. Diagnostic studies provide evidence that variously supports and fails to support a self-medication hypothesis of addictive disorders. The cause-consequence controversy involving psychopathology and substance use/abuse is reviewed and critiqued. In contrast, clinical observations and empirical studies that focus on painful affects and subjective states of distress more consistently suggest that such states of suffering are important psychological determinants in using, becoming dependent upon, and relapsing to addictive substances. Subjective states of distress and suffering involved in motives to self-medicate with substances of abuse are considered with respect to nicotine dependence and to schizophrenia and posttraumatic stress disorder comorbid with a substance use disorder.

The Self-medication Hypothesis of Substance Use Disorders: A Reconsideration and Recent Applications

Medications which bind to opioid receptors are increasingly being prescribed for the treatment of multiple and diverse chronic painful conditions. Their use for acute pain or terminal pain is well accepted. Their role in the long-term treatment of chronic noncancer pain is, however, controversial for many reasons. One of the primary reasons is the well-known phenomenon of psychological addiction that can occur with the use of these medications. Abuse and diversion of these medications is a growing problem as the availability of these medications increases and this public health issue confounds their clinical utility. Also, the extent of their efficacy in the treatment of pain when utilized on a chronic basis has not been definitively proven. Lastly, the role of opioids in the treatment of chronic pain is also influenced by the fact that these potent analgesics are associated with a significant number of side effects and complications. It is these phenomena that are the focus of this review. Common side effects of opioid administration include sedation, dizziness, nausea, vomiting, constipation, physical dependence, tolerance, and respiratory depression. Physical dependence and addiction are clinical concerns that may prevent proper prescribing and in turn inadequate pain management. Less common side effects may include delayed gastric emptying, hyperalgesia, immunologic and hormonal dysfunction, muscle rigidity, and myoclonus. The most common side effects of opioid usage are constipation (which has a very high incidence) and nausea. These 2 side effects can be difficult to manage and frequently tolerance to them does not develop; this is especially true for constipation. They may be severe enough to require opioid discontinuation, and contribute to under-dosing and inadequate analgesia. Several clinical trials are underway to identify adjunct therapies that may mitigate these side effects. Switching opioids and/or routes of administration may also provide benefits for patients. Proper patient screening, education, and preemptive treatment of potential side effects may aid in maximizing effectiveness while reducing the severity of side effects and adverse events. Opioids can be considered broad spectrum analgesic agents, affecting a wide number of organ systems and influencing a large number of body functions.

/pdf/opioid-complications-and-side-effects-29996mciak.pdf

Opioid complications and side effects.

The SAGE Handbook of Drug & Alcohol Studies

Potentiation of buprenorphine antinociception with ultra‐low dose naltrexone in healthy subjects

Nifedipine (10.0 mg/kg) was administered to mice together with graded doses of ethanol (0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 and 4.5 g/kg), and activity measured over a 2-hr period following administration. Low ethanol doses increased activity, whereas the highest dose decreased it. By itself, nifedipine had no effect on activity, but when combined with ethanol it produced a consistent decrease in comparison with ethanol alone. This occurred irrespective of whether the ethanol dose alone increased or decreased activity. These results demonstrate a clear interaction between nifedipine and ethanol which cannot be characterized as simple potentiation or antagonism. Time-course data showed that the effects of nifedipine were apparent within 10-20 min of drug administration, but, in the case of the highest ethanol dose, increased toward the end of the 2-hr period. Retardation of the development of acute tolerance may contribute to the interaction between ethanol and nifedipine.

Modification of the behavioural effects of ethanol by nifedipine.

Antidepressant-like effects of ecstasy in subjects with a predisposition to depression.

Upper limb function was investigated in children with ADHD using objective methods. We hypothesised that children with ADHD exhibit abnormal dexterity, force application during manipulation of a novel object, and movement rhythmicity. Two groups of age- and gender-matched children were investigated: 35 typically developing children (controls, 10.5 ± 0.4 years, 32M-3F) and 29 children (11.5 ± 0.5 years, 27M-2F) with formally diagnosed ADHD according to DSM-IV-TR criteria. Participants underwent a series of screening tests and tests of upper limb function while "off" medication. Objective quantification of upper limb function involved measurement of force during a grip and lift task, maximal finger tapping task, and maximal pinch grip. Acceleration at the index finger was also measured during rest, flexion and extension, and a postural task to quantify tremor. The Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2 (MABC-2) was also administered. Significant between-group differences were observed in movement rhythmicity, manipulation of a novel object, and performance of the MABC-2 dexterity and aiming and catching components. Children with ADHD lifted a novel object using a lower grip force (P = 0.036), and held the object with a more variable grip force (P = 0.003), than controls. Rhythmicity of finger tapping (P = 0.008) and performance on the dexterity (P = 0.007) and aiming and catching (P = 0.042) components of the MABC-2 were also significantly poorer in the ADHD group than controls. Movement speed, maximum pinch grip strength, and tremor were unaffected. The results of the study show for the first time that ADHD is associated with deficits in multiple, but not all domains of upper limb function.

Jason M. White

Papers

The SAGE Handbook of Drug & Alcohol Studies

Potentiation of buprenorphine antinociception with ultra‐low dose naltrexone in healthy subjects

Modification of the behavioural effects of ethanol by nifedipine.

Antidepressant-like effects of ecstasy in subjects with a predisposition to depression.

Upper limb function in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).